Connect with us

Politics

Between Democracy And Politics In Nigeria

Published

on

“The values of freedom, respect for human rights and the principle of holding periodic and genuine elections by universal suffrage are essential elements of democracy.  In turn, democracy provides the natural environment for the protection and effective realization of human rights. These values are embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” –UN.
Nigeria does not have a
democracy. There is politics in Nigeria, in fact too much of it, but no democracy. Having civilian rulers does not make a democracy. And unlike the USA, where as Hilary Clinton said-in-Nigeria, “our democracy is yet evolving,” Nigeria does not yet have a democracy, so nothing is evolving.
Democracy is about the provision of, and protection of Human Rights. It is not simply a process of putting papers in ballot boxes. The conditions to test; questions to ask ourselves are: Are we lead or ruled? Are any of those who rule us the people we would really choose with our eyes open? Do those who rule us represent us and provide us our basic rights? Do they lead us to where we need be, or do they only rule over us for their gains? Are we able to remove them when they fail? And then, can we honestly say that the 80 million rural dwellers are represented, know candidates and vote for candidates to lead them in our current system, or these villagers do not count in the selection but suffer the most from its consequences; these rural dwellers who account for 80 per cent of our 100 million destitute population. These questions are essential conditions democracy fulfils; do we have them?
Choosing leadership is not the single reason why democracy is advocated and why nations adopt it. Getting rid of leaderships is the difference, beauty, essence and unique advantage of democracy. That is the point of democracy. If a so-called  ‘juvenile’ democracy does not yet have the ‘eviction’ capacity, it is not a democracy. Democracy is a very expensive system. The idea of applying this method is not because you for one second think the candidate you are choosing is a great person. Does this mean we hate our sons and daughters who sign-up with the military? Or we think these disciplined family members are less of people and do not have what it takes to lead a nation? The ability to terminate the leadership is as important as the provision of selection. And we must actively have both; having only the one is as good as having none.
In biology of the cell, when a cell fails to pass a ‘check-point,’ the cell automatically tries to repair the problem, and when it is unable, the cell kills itself in a process called Apoptosis. This protects cells from becoming cancerous. In our traditional systems, we used to apply such systems as giving the king the empty calabash or gift of parrot’s eggs, which tells him he has been disapproved of and must take his own life.
Good enough people are plentiful and we actually usually end up with the worst of us with democratic choice. The politician candidates we choose, even if ‘good’ now, we do know they can change to bad people too, and may already be bad people in sheep’s clothing. But we go through that arduous, money wasting, ethnic-fracturing, nation-wrecking, lengthy process of campaigns, political jamborees, pauses in governance, political mismanagement and all other pains of democratic processes, simply because democracy should provide us certain conditions. These conditions are the primary reasons and requisites of democracy.
The first is the perceived ability abinitio to have a choice of candidates that all have a real chance of actually coming into power. Democracy is all about choice. One and even two party systems limit and cancel any reality of choice. A malicious cabal chooses in primaries and the nation is forced to accept and vote-in that one choice or tops, two choices in two party systems. Abolishing parties and at least, prohibiting or capping party expenses which could be by government equal funding of all campaigns, with no private financing allowed, can resolve these, embezzlement and many other campaign financing related issues.
The second condition for a true democracy is the ability to vote out candidates at their term, without conversation of extension of term or threat of terror if they lose the next round. We do not have this.
The third is the ability and likelihood of impeachment of candidates who fail to execute their obligations, within terms. After all, nature usually has its way of ridding us of military dictatorships, and they are usually replaced in our particular experience in about 8 years, making them not much different in terms of lengthy terms, than civilian regimes. Our rules should be firm and protected.
When people are unable to select their candidates but are only imposed candidates, and when only certain party-elite blocks’ imposed candidates have the ability to win, and when candidates cannot be voted out until two terms are completed and/or terms are extended, and then finally when impeachment for failure within term are unavailable, then we have a disguised dictatorship.
On Tuesday the 3rd of December, 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary met to discuss the impeachment of President Barack Obama. The hearing was titled “The President’s Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws.” {Washington Post}
Republican senators felt Obama had not faithfully executed the laws of the land and so they considered impeachment. Ex-US President Bill Clinton was impeached for “laughable” reasons.
The risk and reality of impeachment is as vital to democracy as is the voting process. Leaders merit democracy’s bounty when they are voted in power, and the masses reap its fruit when the leaders know they can and will be impeached when they lie, steal, or in any way fail in their duty to execute the law.
The Nigerian system does not have this key aspect of democracy and as such it is not a democracy. The entire legislature is bribed to abandon their obligation to protect the right of the masses for a check on government.
But to make our non-democracy even more apparent, consider the recurrent dimension of our system with the proposal of term elongations when candidates either realize their term is set to expire or they realize they cannot win again.
The CNPP party said those who suggested a term elongation deserved investigation and repudiation. They were spot-on. Nigerians elected leaders based on four-year term expiration. That was the deal, the package. To waste time, money and muddy the national intelligence by proposing term elongations is frankly criminal.
Will there be a referendum? Are there term truncations? How about the more suggestion to consider a term reduction to three-years to more favorably resolve the quagmire that this political block has put the nation into?
As it stands, the Nigeria is begging for a democracy. One had to just take a look at the recent Anambra elections to know it was and will continue to waste its time as the leadership continues to take advantage of and promote our dictatorial system.
The pictures of those women throwing themselves on and rolling on the ground were pathetic but clearly pretentious. Overall they demonstrated the fact that the system in place did not serve the people and abused the people.
Secondly, in the Anambra election, there were over a million invalid votes, the second largest vote counted. Ballot sheets where voters filled out nonsense. With the general interested populace not being able to vote, this democracy is no democracy as far as people’s choice goes.
There was open and widespread distribution of bribes to buy voters. Indomie noodles boxes (not scholarships) were one such cheap buyoff.
And the candidate party disputes, the widely reported fraud, these things will never go away and as long as they exist, we end up with imposed rulers and not leaders we sort of chose.
In satisfaction of my ideals for my human rights, that I may deem I have a democracy, the minimum I would require is for the administration to establish an enlightened committee to sit down and trash our leadership selection process from scratch. So long as we continue with this useless selection programme and are denied expulsions for failure, my rights are not protected and I am not under a democracy.
Our return to a less tribal and ethnic provocative and less societal rendering parliamentary system of leadership selection is a proposed tactic many have presented that needs to be tabled. When 40 million people go to ballots all around the nation to vote for candidates they know next to nothing of, except a few posters here and there and as we know, having received some peanuts in enticement during campaigns, what results is wars, and the election of the most unworthy. With a parliamentary system, people are restricted to choosing only their local representatives who they have a better chance of actually knowing and holding to account, and it is these reps that select from among them the President. This reduces cost and eliminates volatile complaint and social-media curses being thrown at the top.
We should consider reducing usage of ballots which simply do not work for us. Let us redesign from our objective—representation. The idea is to get representatives and in this, this system fails us. Our market places have representative leaders we are comfortable with. Our Universities have representative leaders we trust, our mechanic unions have leaders we are comfortable with. Our religious organizations select leaders based on skill, rather easily. And all these are chosen inexpensively without bloodshed or precipitating hatred. These same social group leaders can be our representatives? This can be considered to stave off this billion dollar wasteful system that yields nothing.
It is time we have a democracy in Nigeria.
Brimah is a commentator on public affairs

 

Peregrino Brimah

L-R: Deputy Speaker, House of Representatives, and Chairman, ad-hoc Committee on Review of the 1999 Constitution, Rep. Emeka Ihedioha, Chairman, House Committee on Rules and Business, Rep. Albert Tsokwa and House leader, Rep. Mulikat Akande-Adeola, during the committee's public hearing in Abuja, recently. Photo: NAN

L-R: Deputy Speaker, House of Representatives, and Chairman, ad-hoc Committee on Review of the 1999 Constitution, Rep. Emeka Ihedioha, Chairman, House Committee on Rules and Business, Rep. Albert Tsokwa and House leader, Rep. Mulikat Akande-Adeola, during the committee’s public hearing in Abuja, recently.
Photo: NAN

Continue Reading

Politics

INEC Sets Rivers South-East Senatorial By-Election For June 20

Published

on

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has scheduled June 20, 2026, for a series of by-elections into vacant National Assembly seats, with particular focus on the Rivers South-East Senatorial District, where the death of Senator Barinada Mpigi has created a significant political vacuum.

The Rivers contest is expected to draw heightened attention in the oil-rich state, as political actors position for influence in a district long regarded as strategic to the balance of power in Rivers State.

INEC disclosed that the by-elections will hold concurrently with the Ekiti State governorship election, underscoring what promises to be a politically charged day across several parts of the country.

Beyond Rivers, the electoral body listed other affected constituencies to include Nasarawa North Senatorial District, Dawakin Kudu/Warawa Federal Constituency in Kano State, Ondo South Senatorial District, and Enugu North Senatorial District.

The vacancies, according to INEC, arose from a combination of deaths, resignation, and other constitutional developments. In Nasarawa, the demise of Senator Godiya Akwashika has left a gap in a district considered a stronghold of the All Progressives Congress (APC). In Enugu, the passing of Senator Okey Ezea has set the stage for a competitive race in the South-East.

Similarly, the Ondo South seat became vacant following the resignation of Senator Jimoh Ibrahim, who now serves as Nigeria’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, while the Dawakin Kudu/Warawa seat in Kano opened up after the death of Hon. Muhammad Danjuma Hassan.

Analysts say the Rivers South-East by-election, in particular, could reshape political alignments in the state, as parties jostle to fill the void left by Sen. Mpigi and consolidate their foothold ahead of future electoral contests.

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Bayelsa Senator Gets Critical Endorsement For Second Term

Published

on

Stakeholder from Bayelsa East Senatorial District, on Monday, endorsed the incumbent Senator representing them to run for a second term.

 

Leading the stakeholders, the former  Commissioner for Culture and Tourism and Special Adviser to Governor Douye Diri on Political Affairs (iii), Dr Iti  Orugbani, said the reason for the endorsement was based on the federal lawmaker’s trajectory of good deeds and massive execution of projects across communities of the Senatorial district.

 

Dr Orugbani highlighted some of the projects to include landing jetties, telecommunication masts and town halls amongst others, noting that Sen. Agadaga’s performance has exceeded those of others who hitherto represented the oil rich area.

 

Bayelsa East Senatorial District comprises Ogbia, Brass and Nembe Local Government Areas of the State.

 

The Governor’s aide who called on the State’s Eastern political enclave to respect the 2022 new zoning agreement, which guaranteed second term for Senators from the District, stressed the need for political tolerance and peace in the forthcoming 2027 polls.

 

“In 2022 the leaders and stakeholders across party lines from Bayelsa East held a meeting and altered the old single term for Senators from the district’s agreement and signed that begining from 2023 any Senator emerging from the district must serve for a minimum of two terms.

 

“In 2023, Senator Biobarakuma Degi-Eremienyo, then an incumbent Senator representing the Senatorial district under the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) was given a second term ticket by the party. Though he lost to the PDP.

 

“Now that the entire state is now APC and the District has an APC Senator in the person of Benson Agadaga from Ogbia LGA, why not also give him a second tenure?

 

“The stakeholders in 2022 changed the old political agreement because they saw that it wasn’t beneficial to the district any longer. And so, because it was Ogbia Local Government Area that started the old zoning arrangement by producing the first Senator in 1999, I want to plead that let Ogbia also begin the new two terms zoning agreement”, he said.

 

Also speaking, the duo of woman leader of a support group, ‘Agadema Women’, Mrs. Owadaba Jokori and the Information Officer of the Ijaw Youths Council (IYC), Central Zone, Comrade Ikio, stated that the incumbent Senator has done well for the district in the past three years that he has been in office.

 

They lauded the federal lawmaker for his infrastructure projects, especially the construction of landing jetties in select communities of the three local government areas of the district, commending stakeholders for supporting the lawmaker in his second term bid.

 

In his remarks, Senator Agadaga thanked the stakeholders for the confidence reposed in him and the endorsements he has received lately from constituents and admirers across political parties.

 

The lawmaker noted that within the past three years that he has been Senator, he has delivered dividends of democracy to his constituents across the Senatorial District, emphasizing that  the call for him to be senator from the Brass Senatorial District came to him as a surprise, noting that he accepted the clarion call when the clamour became so loud.

 

“I was Chief of Staff to the State Governor, Senator Douye Diri, when various groups from the zone came calling on me to contest the 2023 Senatorial polls.

 

“Ever since winning the elections as a senator, I’ve continued to deliver on my mandate in both representation, lawmaking, oversight, project execution and support for constituents when called upon.  And I shall continue to do more if elected for a second term”, the Senator said.

 

By Ariwera Ibibo-Howells, Yenagoa

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Court Sets Deadline For Suit Seeking To Disqualify Jonathan

Published

on

Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja has set May 15 as deadline for definite hearing in a suit filed by a lawyer, Johnmary Jideobi, seeking to stop former President Goodluck Jonathan from contesting the 2027 presidential election.

The judge on Monday shifted the hearing date following the absence of the plaintiff, Mr Jideobi, and his lawyer in court without any information.

Apart from the absence of the plaintiff, who is a legal practitioner, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, who are 2nd and 3rd defendants in the matter, were also not in court.

Following the absence of the plaintiff and the two defendants, Chris Uche, SAN, representing Dr Jonathan, applied to the court to strike out the suit for lack of diligent prosecution.

Having joined issues with each other, Mr Uche said, the suit is liable for dismissal with a N5 million cost to be awarded against the plaintiff and payable to Dr Jonathan.

He argued that from all indications, the plaintiff has abandoned the suit and ran away upon sighting the preliminary objections raised against the suit, adding that the court is a busy place and not for unserious matters.

Justice Lifu, however, noted that there was no evidence of service of hearing notice on INEC and AGF to appear in court for the suit, adding that lack of service of hearing notice is fundamental.

The judge said rather than striking out the suit, he prefers to bend backward to accommodate the plaintiff and the two defendants for the last time.

While adjourning the matter to May 15, Justice Lifu ordered that hearing notice be served on the plaintiff and the 2nd and 3rd defendants who were not in court on Monday.

The plaintiff, Mr Jideobi, had filed the case seeking an order to restrain Dr Jonathan from presenting himself to any political party as an aspirant for the 2027 election.

He is also asking the court to stop INEC from accepting, processing or publishing Dr Jonathan’s name as a presidential candidate.

 

Continue Reading

Trending