Opinion
Fast-Tracking The Niger Delta Master Plan
When Europe was virtually on its knees at the end of the Second World War, it took the intervention of the United States of America, armed with a Marshall Plan, to revive the devastated economy of the continent. The positive rings of that initiative have continued to reverberate across the globe over the years. In Nigeria, the Federal Government took a cue and included the drawing up of a Master Plan in the Act setting up the Niger Delta Development Commission [NDDC]. It was meant to produce a comprehensive compass that would guide the orderly and rapid development of the region.
To actualise this mandate, the commission promptly engaged international experts to produce the highly acclaimed Niger Delta Regional Development Master Plan (NDRMP). The document, which took several years and huge resources to develop, has been globally applauded as one of the greatest achievements of the NDDC which facilitated the project. The overall objective is to fast-track the development of the region that produces over 90 per cent of the country’s oil wealth.
The importance of this regional plan, aptly described as a roadmap to development, is better appreciated against the background of the abysmal performances of previous interventionists’ agencies from the Niger Delta Development Board [NDDB] set up in 1961 to the Oil Minerals Producing Areas Development Commission [OMPADEC] inaugurated in 1992. It is no secret that one of the reasons those agencies failed to tackle the developmental challenges of the region was because of the absence of a comprehensive master plan.
The choice of GTZ International of Germany and Wilbahi Engineering Consortium of Nigeria as lead consultants that produced a world-class master plan was deliberate, as they have cognate pedigree. In addition, 30 sector consultants and various resource consultants were assembled to work on different aspects of the plan to further enhance its global competitiveness. The process was systematic and laborious as several workshops and seminars were organised with oil-bearing communities, local, state and federal governments, international donor agencies, oil companies, among others.
The Master Plan is structured in 3-5-year phases, namely: the foundation phase (2006-20 I 0); the expansion phase (20112015); and the consolidation phase (2016-2020). It can be said to be the first integrated development plan driven by stakeholders’ participation in Nigeria because it covers different sectors including health, education, transportation and agriculture, while its objectives embrace economic growth and infrastructural development.
The comprehensive work was approved and adopted by the Federal Government as a document that holds the key to c he rapid development of the Niger Delta. The governors and other political leaders of the region were satisfied as they were Ii part of the processes that produced the plan from the scratch. The then President Olusegun Obasanjo was excited and de- f lighted on March 27, 2007, when it was officially launched. He ~ said: “It is my abiding belief that we are launching the commencement of a voyage of hope that will sail the Niger Delta past a legacy of turbulence, neglect and poverty into an assured future as our nation’s most peaceful, most prosperous and most ecologically regenerative region by 2020″.
The administration of late President Umaru Musa Yar’ Adua, which succeeded Obasanjo, also agreed that the plan has the capacity of adequately addressing the development challenges of the Niger Delta. The commission has through its Partners for Sustainable Development [PSD] Forum brought all the stakeholders under one umbrella to aid the process of harmonising projects in the region as enunciated in the plan.
Incidentally, the first official assignment of the present NDDC Managing Director, Mr. Chibuzor Ugwuoha was the attendance of a workshop by the PSD Forum in Port Harcourt. His remarks at that occasion underscored the importance he attached to partnership. He said: “We know that the task of developing the Niger Delta is enormous. We cannot do it individually but together we can do it.” Ugwoha’s emphasis
on the PSD Forum as a platform for collaboration is in line with his desire to engender further buy-in and commitment of all stakeholders to the Master Plan. He said that since the Master Plan constitutes the template for tackling the developmental challenges of the Niger Delta, the commission needs to constantly engage-stakeholders in implementing it.
Currently, the NDDC boss has been visiting the state governors in the region and using every opportunity to reiterate the importance of the partnership arrangements already worked out with them. The visits have become necessary at this time
– to rekindle the interest of some state governments and other key stakeholders to the Niger Delta project that seems to have dwindled over time. A lot of people are worried that the key stakeholders appear to have abandoned the implementation vehicle for only the NDDC to drive. This is unfortunate because the Master Plan is a property of all Niger Delta people.
Perhaps, the setting up of the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs contributed to the loss of focus. At the onset, the mandate of the ministry was not very clear, and its interface with the NDDC was at best hazy. Even in terms of allocating funds for the critical needs of the Niger Delta, both the executive d the legislature appeared to treat the ministry and the commission as if they were eating from the same pot. In 2008, the National Assembly approved a budget of N79 billion for the NDDC. In 2009, however, its budget was drastically reduced to N27 billion, while N50 billion was budgeted for the new ministry. Thus, both of them got the same amount only the NDDC got a year earlier.
It, therefore, came as a big relief when President Goodluck Jonathan issued Niger Deltans recently that the lofty plans captured in the master Plan would be pursued with renewed vigor. He said: “Let me assure you that I am irrevocably committed to the development of the Niger-Delta. We must develop the region to restore condence and hope among our people and children. To this end, let me assure you that the Niger-Delta Master Plan for development is on course and we will assist the NDDC and all the state governments to faithfully implement it.”
The Federal Government should match its words with action by going a step further to mobilise all the stakeholders to put their hands on the plough to get the plan moving at optimum speed. In 2008, there was an understanding that all the nine states budgets could be prepared to fit into the Master Plan, to ensure that they actually keyed into its implementation. It would, therefore, be good to ensure that the central government, states, local governments, oil companies and other stakeholders work in harmony to realise the lofty dreams inherent in the Master Plan. Every one of them should be allocated specific roles on which they can be held accountable. It is encouraging that the state governors in the region are beginning to take keen interest in the affairs of the commission which drives the master plan process. Recently, the hitherto dormant Advisory Committee of the NDDC, which comprises the governors and the principal officers of the commission, sprang into life after many years of inaction. The advisory committee intervened in the internal challenges that have confronted the interventionist agency of late. The long expected meeting of that moderating body also deliberated on how to aggressively implement the master Plan. With the governors now putting heads together with the NDDC management, there is hope that the Master Plan will now experience new lease of life. The Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs should be mandated to play a key role in coordinating the activities of the various stakeholders. If the ministry does that, it will help to facilitate the smooth implementation of the Master Plan and consequently the development of the region. There should be some sense of urgency in its implementation knowing full well that the first five years of the 15-year plan, termed the foundation phase, is ending his year.
Agbu wrote from Port Harcourt.
Ifeatu Agbu
Opinion
The Rantings Of Rivers ALGON
For the first time in the last eight years , one can observe a moribund and toothless, Association of Local Government of Nigeria, Rivers State Chapter trying to lull the people of Rivers State in believing that it exists, that it is versed and abreast with the provisions of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), knowledgeable about subsisting judicial pronouncements on the Local government administration matters by courts of competent jurisdiction, and it has workers and. the people’s welfare at heart.
These wrong impressions can be deduced from the text of the Press Conference delivered by the Association last week.
Despite the window dressing and cosmetic posture that the Association of Local Government of Nigeria, Rivers Sttate chapter wants to impress on the people and residents of Rivers State, it is crystal clear that workers at the Third Tier of Government have not fared well in the last eight years of the repressive and workers unfriendly immediate past administration in the State.
While workers at the State were fortunate to have a controversial minimum wage paid to them, local Government workers did not benefit from the N30,000 Minimum Wage which became a legal instrument about six years until March 2024, following a directive by the Executive Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, to Local Government chairmen in the State to immediately implement the minimum wage, wage award and promote workers.
Where was.the Legal Adviser of the Association of Local Government of Nigeria, whose statutory responsibility it was to advise the former Rivers State. Governor that it is an affront on the sensibilities of workers and fragrant.breach of extant law to not pay minimum wage to workers at.the 23 Local Government councils.
Civil servants at the State and Local Government councils were not promoted and did not benefit from the annual incremental credit for about ten years. The incremental credit is a paltry and very insignificant amount compared to the inputs of workers to drive implementation of government policies and programmes and what elective office holders take home within the comparable period.
I had expected a “concerned and workers-friendly ‘ Association of Local Government in the State to midwife the promotion of workers, implementation of Minimum wage and fulfill their statutory obligations to the workers and the people at the local government areas whose resources they hold in trust and on whose behest they are in power.
It therefore beats my imagination that Local Government Chairmen of ALGON, who are products of the ballot and not appointees of the former governor lost their “Executive” status and played the second fiddle role. Even when there was unconfirmed tampering of local government funds, they could not protest or raise an eye brow.
How the people who were cowardly and timid before the former administration in the State suddenly cultivated and imbibed the effrontry and temerity to hold a Press Conference attempting to disparage the performing and conscientious Sir Siminalayi Fubara-led administration leaves much to be desired and a bad taste in the mouth of all patriotic and truthful Rivers people.
I expected the self serving chairmen under the aegis of the Association of Local Government of Nigeria to brace up to the challenges of seeming derecognition and denial of their right of expression as elected chairmen by the former administration in the State.
While the ALGON has the legitimacy to contest violation of, or infringement on their interests, such protest should not be seen as selective. Between 1999 and 2003, the Association of Local Government of.Nigeria in Rivers State was vociferous and so alive to its onus that they rejected allocations that did not reflect the true figures of what the local government councils deserved from the Joint Account Allocation Committee (JAAC). That was when ALGON was keen and committed to the essence of its formation. That was a real workers-friendly ALGON.
However, with the advent of crude and uncivilised godfatherism that circumvented real democratic processes for manipulative and coercive selection that ultimately produced unpopular candidates of the godfather, chairmen were reduced to puppets, playing subservient roles for their benefactors instead of protecting the interest and welfare of workers and the people of their local government areas, who they ought to represent.
Having therefore failed to speak up for workers and defend the welfare of the people of their local government areas, at a time they were oppressed, the association in my candid opinion does not have the moral justification to cry fowl against the present administration in Rivers State whose policies and programmes so far, reveal that the governor understands that the legitimacy of his administration is derived from the people, so he is accountable to them by putting in place infrastructure that will give fresh breath to a people who are recuperating from the suffocation of repressive and coercive governance.
Sir Siminalayi Fubara is today a messiah to workers in Rivers State. Local government. workers are .being paid minimum wage, promoted and duly placed at their appropriate levels after 10 years of no promotion.
Civil servants in the State are sure of receiving their pensions immediately after retirement from service which was a marked. departure from previous administration.
Rather than vilifying or demonising the present administration in the State, the Association of Local Government of.Nigeria, Rivers State should thank the Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, for doing in less than one year what their grand master could not do for them and workers in eight years.
Remember, everyone will stand in the court of history and posterity to account for their actions and inactions in office.
Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Kidnapping: Need For Govt To Address The Monster
Kidnapping, a heinous crime, cannot be condoned in any circumstances. The situation in Nigeria, characterised by various security challenges, including the presence of militant groups and criminal organisations, requires a multifaceted approach to address its root causes.
A report by the Beacon Security and Intelligence Limited, a security risk management and intelligence company based in Abuja, stated that at least 2,583 people were killed and 2,164 kidnapped in the first quarter of this year.
The record carries the number of killings and abductions across the country from January to March, indicating that 80 percent of the killings and 94 percent of the abductions occurred in the Northern part of Nigeria.
This report, however, varied with the position by the National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu, who said that the casualty figures were going down, the consulting firm’s report showed that an average of 28 persons were killed and 24 kidnapped.
The Nigerian government, through the Minister of Defence, Muhammad Badaru Abubakar, during the maiden edition of the annual lecture series organised by the Nigerian Army Resource Centre in Abuja, said the security situation was under control.
The casualty figures in zones, according to the data from the Beacon Security and Intelligence Limited, revealed that out of the people killed during the period, 793 were from the North-West, 681 from the North-East and 596 from the North-Central. The casualties were recorded from bandits’ attacks, farmers/herders’ conflicts and communal clashes.
The South-West recorded 194 killings, the South-South, 161 people; and South-East, 158. The five states with the highest number of killings were Borno, 517; Benue, 313; Katsina, 252; Zamfara, 212 and Kaduna, 206. The data showed that out of the 2,164 persons abducted within the period, 1,297 were kidnapped in the North-West, 421 in the North-East, 330 in the North-Central, 30 in the South-West, 66 in the South-South and 20 in the South-East.
Kaduna State recorded the highest number of abductees with 546; Zamfara, 447; Borno, 340; Katsina, 252 and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), 102. Experts hope that the present government under President Bola Tinubu will do the needful.
Firstly, addressing the socioeconomic factors that contribute to kidnapping is crucial. High unemployment rates, poverty, and lack of economic opportunities push individuals towards criminal activities. Investing in education, job creation programmes, and infrastructure development can help alleviate these issues and provide alternatives to crime.
Secondly, strengthening law enforcement and judicial systems is essential. Improving police training, equipping them with necessary resources, and enhancing collaboration between security agencies can help in apprehending criminals and ensuring justice for victims. Additionally, enhancing the efficiency of the judicial process and holding perpetrators accountable through swift and fair trials can deter future criminal activities.
Furthermore, enhancing intelligence gathering and surveillance capabilities can help in preempting kidnapping attempts and dismantling criminal networks. Cooperation between government agencies, intelligence services, and international partners can facilitate information sharing and coordination in combating organised crime.
Moreover, addressing corruption within the government and security forces is imperative. Corruption undermines efforts to combat crime by facilitating criminal activities and eroding public trust in institutions. Implementing anti-corruption measures, promoting transparency, and holding corrupt officials accountable can help in restoring trust and integrity within the system.
Community engagement and empowerment play a vital role in preventing kidnapping and other crimes. Building strong community relationships, fostering trust between residents and law enforcement agencies, and promoting community-based initiatives can help in identifying and addressing security threats at the grassroots level.
Finally, kidnapping in Nigeria is a complex issue that requires a comprehensive and coordinated approach. Addressing socioeconomic factors, strengthening law enforcement and judicial systems, enhancing intelligence capabilities, combating corruption, engaging communities, and promoting international cooperation are all crucial components in combating kidnapping and improving security in the country. However, it is important to remember that any strategy must prioritise human rights, the rule of law, and the protection of innocent lives.
Badamasi Junaidu
Junaidu writes from Abubakar Tatari Ali Polytechnic, Bauchi.
Opinion
Local Government As Agent Of Nation Building
Development is regarded as sequential changes or growths that occur in a society or country over time. It remains a product of good governance, which mostly lies in the hands of those at the helm of affairs at a particular time and process that led to the emergence of such leaders.
The local government is universally found in contemporary societies, both in the developed and developing countries. It is a vital political institution, such that modern politics and administration revolves around it. Today, most countries across the globe have adopted democratic system of government, being the government of the people, by the people and for the people. In these countries, governance is centered on three tiers with constitutional backing to aid rapid development. A country like Nigeria has three tiers of government, Federal, State and Local Governments. Each tier has constitutional roles, aimed at complementing each other. The mother of them, that is, the Federal Government, plays significant roles in nation building, and this is one of the reasons why citizens always look unto the presidency and participate actively during presidential elections conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
It is an established fact that citizens also perform their civic responsibilities as expected during the governorship elections, while there is a lot of apathy during the chairmanship and councillorship elections, forgetting that without a solid foundation, the longevity of structure or building is in doubt.
Citizens’ nonchalant attitude to the process that produces public administrators at the grassroots is quite alarming, and this usually results into having the wrong peg in the right hole.
Findings revealed that voter apathy associated with local government council elections was due to non-performance of some previous elected administrators, lack of security of lives or property and lack of trust in States Independent Electoral Commission (SIECs). Others include introduction of caretaker committees to man the affairs of the councils, do-or-die approach of political soldiers to the council’s polls, interest of the incumbent governors, choice of political godfathers, influence of respected monarchs and many more. The local government is a tier of government that provides essential services to the public, such as health and safety, transportation, sanitation, environmental, and utilities.
Also, it is the tier of government that ensures grading of rural roads, management of basic schools, local markets, among others. Public administrators play a crucial role in the delivery of these services and the management of local government organisations. Some time ago, the governor of Akwa Ibom State, Pastor Umo Eno, at the swearing-in ceremony of chairmen and vice chairmen of Nsit Ibom and Urue–Offong / Oruka Local Governments, compelled chairmen of the local government councils in the state to reside within their areas of jurisdiction for effective delivery on their mandate and development of rural areas.
Also, the ongoing campaign or demand for financial autonomy for local government by relevant stakeholders in the country further attests to how important this tier of government is in building a prosperous and self-sustained nation.
This development led to the conduct of local government council election in the 33 local government council areas of the state in 2021 by the current leadership of the Oyo State Independent Electoral Commission (OYSIEC), headed by a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Aare Isiaka Abiola Olagunju. About 30 percent of registered voters took part in the election, a result that further attest to the long-time nonchalant attitude of citizens and residents to local government council elections. According to records, the feat attained by the commission in terms of voter turnout was the highest in recent times.
No doubt, democracy provides opportunity for people to choose their leaders and enables citizens to make their opinions known to those in power, enjoy good governance and interface with the authorities, especially those at the grassroots.
Adegoke writes in from Ibadan, Oyo State.
By: Adedamola Adegoke
-
Oil & Energy2 days ago
Oil Producing Communities Suffer Environmental Degradation – Reps
-
Health4 hours ago
How Dates Boost Fertility
-
Sports2 hours ago
How African Players Performed In Europe Last Week
-
News2 days ago
Assembly Crisis: Fubara Is In Charge Of Govt Property -Inko-Tariah
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
CP Advises Hoteliers On Security
-
Editorial4 hours ago
Diesel Price Cut, Building On Dangote’s Example
-
News2 days ago
FG To Receive $2.25bn World Bank Loan, June 13
-
Niger Delta4 hours ago
PDP Belongs To All Of Us, Oborevwori Assures Protesters