Politics
Aregbesola, Omisore Know Fate, Today …As Tribunal Gives Verdict
The Election Petitions Tri
bunal hearing matters relating to the August 9, 2014 governorship election in Osun State will deliver its final verdict on the election today.
The governorship candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Senator Iyinola Omisore had dragged Governor Raufu Aregbesola of the All Progressives Congress (APC) to the tribunal.
It will be recalled that Aregbesola polled 394,684 votes in the poll to beat his main challenger, Omisore who scored 292,747 votes.
Omisore prayed the tribunal to sack Governor Aregbesola and declare him (Omisore) winner of the poll.
Omisore’s counsel, Dr. Alex Izinyon (SAN) had told the tribunal during the address stage that Aregbesola admitted that he scored 234,971 votes, and not 394,684 credited to him by the Independent National Electoral commission (INEC).
But Aregbesola’s counsel, Chief Akin Olujinmi explained that the governor did not admit scoring less than the number of votes credited to him by INEC.
He stated that what the table meant was that “assuming with our conceding that the tribunal cancel the result in the disputed units, the first respondent (Aregbesola) would still have won with the new figure.”
Arguing that the petitioner failed to prove his petition, the counsel referred to the objection of the first respondent to the petition at the hearing stage, saying he adopted the two applications filed to challenge the competence of the petition.
Olujinmi argued further that the petitioner dumped the ballot papers used for the election and other electoral materials at the tribunal without proving to the panel how they relate to the case, and therefore urged the tribunal to dismiss the case.
Aregbesola’s counsel also stated that the duplicate copies of Form EC8A tendered by the petitioner were inadmissible, and that those who tendered them were not the makers of the documents.
In his own submission, counsel to the APC, Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu (SAN) also urged the tribunal to strike out the petition by Omisore.
Akeredolu adopted APC’s written address and the arguments of the first respondent in the case.
According to him, he was not opposed to the objectives raised by the first and third respondents (Omisore and INEC, respectively) in their written addresses, adding that the suggestion of the petitioner that the APC did not have locus in the case was strange.
Akeredolu argued that the purported certified true copies of documents tendered did not conform to the provisions of the law.
According to him, the documents were not listed nor pleaded and those who tendered them were not the makers.
Counsel to the INEC, Mr. Ayotunde Ogunleye had adopted the same argument by Omisore and APC, arguing that nobody came before the panel to give evidence that they were disenfranchised during the poll.
He said that the petitioner had failed to prove the burden of proof shifted to him and that his petition should be dismissed.
Politics
2027: Bayelsa APC Adopts Tinubu As Sole Candidate … As Lokpobiri, Lyon Shun Meeting
Politics
Alleged Smear Campaign Against Yakubu, CSOs Demand Apology From Uzodimma

During a press conference held in Owerri, the coalition called the campaign a “dangerous and shameful display” designed to distract the public from the governor’s performance in office.
The CSOs directly linked the Greater Imo Initiative (GII) —the group that made the allegations on September 4, 2025—to Governor Uzodimma, describing the group as his “mouthpiece and attack dog.”
“Every word spoken against INEC was spoken on his behalf.
“By falsely alleging that Professor Yakubu has an alliance with Dr. Amadi to compromise the 2027 elections, Uzodimma has not only maligned a man of proven integrity but also assaulted the very foundation of our democracy”, said Dr Agbo Frederick, speaking for the coalition.
The coalition described Professor Yakubu as a “beacon of electoral professionalism” and called the attempt to soil his reputation “defamatory and a national security risk.”
They also defended Dr. Amadi, a “respected development scholar,” stating that the governor’s accusations were “laughable, desperate, and dangerous.”
The CSOs see the motive behind the campaign as an attempt to “silence the dissent, intimidate the opposition, and divert attention from the governor’s abysmal record in office.”
The coalition issued four key demands to Governor Uzodimma: An immediate retraction of the false and defamatory allegations against Professor Mahmood Yakubu and Dr. Chima Amadi.
- A public apology to both men within seven days, to be published in at least three national newspapers and broadcast on major television networks.
- An end to diversionary tactics and proxy propaganda.
- A renewed focus on governance, including addressing insecurity, unemployment, and poverty in Imo State.
The CSOs warned that failure to comply would force them to “review our position with a view to seeking legal redress from Governor Uzodimma for defamation, false accusation, and reckless endangerment of lives.”
“Governor Uzodimma must be reminded that he did not find himself in the seat of power to chase shadows.
“We call on all Nigerians to reject Uzodimma’s diversionary antics as they are nothing short of desperate plots by a government terrified of accountability”, the statement concluded.
Politics
Stopping Natasha’s Resumption Threatens Nigeria’s Democracy – ADC
In a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC expressed concern that preventing the senator from resuming her legislative duties violates democratic principles and disenfranchises her constituents.
“The suspension, having been imposed by the Senate and not a court of law, has lapsed. Any further attempt to prevent her from resuming is therefore both illegal and morally indefensible,” Mallam Abdullahi said.
The party noted that denying Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan access to the chamber silences the voice of the people who elected her, adding that the withdrawal of her salary, aides, and office access during the suspension amounted to excessive punishment.
The ADC also criticised the Clerk of the National Assembly for declining to process her resumption on grounds that the matter was before the courts, arguing that the Clerk’s role was administrative, not judicial.
“Administrative caution must not translate into complicity. When the administrative machinery becomes hostage to political interests, the institution itself is diminished,” the party stated.
Highlighting that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan is one of only four women in the 109-member Senate, the ADC warned that the handling of the case sends a discouraging signal about gender inclusion in Nigerian politics.
“Any action that resembles gender intimidation of the few women in the Senate would only discourage women’s participation. Nigeria cannot claim to be a democracy while excluding half of its population from key decision-making spaces,” Mallam Abdullahi added.
The ADC insisted that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan be allowed to resume her seat immediately, stressing that the matter was about more than one individual.
“What is at stake here is not just one Senate seat, but the integrity of our democracy itself,” the party said.
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Bayelsa APC Adopts Tinubu As Sole Candidate … As Lokpobiri, Lyon Shun Meeting
-
Sports3 days ago
GOtv Boxing Night 34 holds Dec. in Lagos
-
Sports3 days ago
WCQ: NFF Denies Post Match Statement
-
Politics3 days ago
Alleged Smear Campaign Against Yakubu, CSOs Demand Apology From Uzodimma
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Jega Condemns Premature Campaigns, Blames Elected Officials
-
Politics3 days ago
Why INEC Can’t Punish Politicians For Early Campaigns – Yakubu
-
Politics3 days ago
Stopping Natasha’s Resumption Threatens Nigeria’s Democracy – ADC
-
Sports3 days ago
Gov. Decries Delta’s Poor Performance At 2025 NYG