Politics
2023: NEDG To Select Four Presidential Candidates For Debate

The Nigeria Election Debate Group (NEDG), has hinted plans to streamline its presidential debates, saying only four presidential candidates would be considered for the 2023 presidential debate.
Consequently, the group said the four candidates will be decided through opinion polls, which according to the group is already ongoing.
The Nigeria Election Debate Group (NEDG), Nigeria Economic Summit Group (NESG) and Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD), and other partners from civil society organisations are putting the 2023 debate together.
Briefing the media ahead of the planned 2023 presidential debate, the executive secretary, NEDG, Mr. Eddie Emessiri, said the debate would only accommodate four political parties that are deemed to be serious by all parameters.
He also said that the debate would have four sessions and also four thematic areas. Of the four sessions, three would be for the presidential candidates and one will be for the Vice Presidential candidates.
According to him, the first session that will be held in Abuja on 15 November will be an Economic debate.
“The focus would be on the economy.
“The second leg of the debate slated for 15 December, will hold in Port Harcourt and will be for the vice presidential candidates.
“The third leg will hold in Lagos on 19 January 2023 and the focus would be on foreign policy, education and security.”
The fourth leg, Emessiri said will hold in Kano in February 2023.
Explaining the reason for streamlining the number of presidential candidates, Emessiri said it is impossible to get the best from the debate with 18 presidential candidates.
He said, “So NEDG has selection criteria and a framework that we use to shortlist some candidates that will be invited.
“Following the selection criteria that we’re employing, we’re also carrying out a poll with the general public in order to validate the selection criteria and the names of the people who will be appearing in the debates because it needs to be by two largely popular consent.
“The results of that will be out shortly and once they are, we’ll be releasing them to the general public.”
He stressed that because of the large number of presidential candidates, the group had to settle for criteria and methodology for the selection process.
He said, “You know, when you repeat, if you want to do a broadcast for the whole debate, bring in 18 people, you will, people will get fed up and they won’t want to listen. So what we intend to do is to select the best of the candidates from the polls.”
Politics
2027: Bayelsa APC Adopts Tinubu As Sole Candidate … As Lokpobiri, Lyon Shun Meeting
Politics
Alleged Smear Campaign Against Yakubu, CSOs Demand Apology From Uzodimma

During a press conference held in Owerri, the coalition called the campaign a “dangerous and shameful display” designed to distract the public from the governor’s performance in office.
The CSOs directly linked the Greater Imo Initiative (GII) —the group that made the allegations on September 4, 2025—to Governor Uzodimma, describing the group as his “mouthpiece and attack dog.”
“Every word spoken against INEC was spoken on his behalf.
“By falsely alleging that Professor Yakubu has an alliance with Dr. Amadi to compromise the 2027 elections, Uzodimma has not only maligned a man of proven integrity but also assaulted the very foundation of our democracy”, said Dr Agbo Frederick, speaking for the coalition.
The coalition described Professor Yakubu as a “beacon of electoral professionalism” and called the attempt to soil his reputation “defamatory and a national security risk.”
They also defended Dr. Amadi, a “respected development scholar,” stating that the governor’s accusations were “laughable, desperate, and dangerous.”
The CSOs see the motive behind the campaign as an attempt to “silence the dissent, intimidate the opposition, and divert attention from the governor’s abysmal record in office.”
The coalition issued four key demands to Governor Uzodimma: An immediate retraction of the false and defamatory allegations against Professor Mahmood Yakubu and Dr. Chima Amadi.
- A public apology to both men within seven days, to be published in at least three national newspapers and broadcast on major television networks.
- An end to diversionary tactics and proxy propaganda.
- A renewed focus on governance, including addressing insecurity, unemployment, and poverty in Imo State.
The CSOs warned that failure to comply would force them to “review our position with a view to seeking legal redress from Governor Uzodimma for defamation, false accusation, and reckless endangerment of lives.”
“Governor Uzodimma must be reminded that he did not find himself in the seat of power to chase shadows.
“We call on all Nigerians to reject Uzodimma’s diversionary antics as they are nothing short of desperate plots by a government terrified of accountability”, the statement concluded.
Politics
Stopping Natasha’s Resumption Threatens Nigeria’s Democracy – ADC
In a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC expressed concern that preventing the senator from resuming her legislative duties violates democratic principles and disenfranchises her constituents.
“The suspension, having been imposed by the Senate and not a court of law, has lapsed. Any further attempt to prevent her from resuming is therefore both illegal and morally indefensible,” Mallam Abdullahi said.
The party noted that denying Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan access to the chamber silences the voice of the people who elected her, adding that the withdrawal of her salary, aides, and office access during the suspension amounted to excessive punishment.
The ADC also criticised the Clerk of the National Assembly for declining to process her resumption on grounds that the matter was before the courts, arguing that the Clerk’s role was administrative, not judicial.
“Administrative caution must not translate into complicity. When the administrative machinery becomes hostage to political interests, the institution itself is diminished,” the party stated.
Highlighting that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan is one of only four women in the 109-member Senate, the ADC warned that the handling of the case sends a discouraging signal about gender inclusion in Nigerian politics.
“Any action that resembles gender intimidation of the few women in the Senate would only discourage women’s participation. Nigeria cannot claim to be a democracy while excluding half of its population from key decision-making spaces,” Mallam Abdullahi added.
The ADC insisted that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan be allowed to resume her seat immediately, stressing that the matter was about more than one individual.
“What is at stake here is not just one Senate seat, but the integrity of our democracy itself,” the party said.
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Bayelsa APC Adopts Tinubu As Sole Candidate … As Lokpobiri, Lyon Shun Meeting
-
Sports3 days ago
GOtv Boxing Night 34 holds Dec. in Lagos
-
Sports3 days ago
WCQ: NFF Denies Post Match Statement
-
Politics3 days ago
Alleged Smear Campaign Against Yakubu, CSOs Demand Apology From Uzodimma
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Jega Condemns Premature Campaigns, Blames Elected Officials
-
Politics3 days ago
Why INEC Can’t Punish Politicians For Early Campaigns – Yakubu
-
Politics3 days ago
Stopping Natasha’s Resumption Threatens Nigeria’s Democracy – ADC
-
Sports3 days ago
Gov. Decries Delta’s Poor Performance At 2025 NYG