Opinion
Agony Of Bank Customers
In an attempt to establish quality service delivery in Nigerian banks, a former Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Professor Charles Chukwuma Soludo, launched a most far-reaching and comprehensive recapitalisation and consolidation of the banking sector.
Twenty-five banks emerged after the consolidation. Two positive effects of the restructuring are the banking industry enjoyed a lot more confidence from both the local and international communities and it experienced exponential growth in Africa.
Prior to the recapitalisation in 2005, Nigeria had 89 banks which when aggregated were no match for a bank in South Africa. But after the transformation, some of the banks became stronger and were found among the top 100 in Africa and the top 1000 globally.
The successful change in the banking sector more than cheered up Nigerians; it was succulent to their ears. Unfortunately, the reformers exonerated quite a number of non-performing aspects of the banks. This has made business transactions with banks a nightmare scenario.
Banking halls are increasingly congested, a development that often relinquishes customers to besotted looks, while long queues exist every single day. As a result, the bank arenas are stuffy, untidy, and choky as the air conditioners are generally ineffective.
Queues are exceedingly lengthy in a manner that incapacitates queue markers in the halls. Contour-like lines extending beyond the banking halls to the outside are observable, thus creating unprecedented frustration for customers and exposing them to risk.
Indeed, time-wasting in our banks has assumed a professed and accepted norm such that many persons lose their jobs or come close to that as such employees are mostly accused by their employers of using the long wait in line as a pretext to engage in their private concerns.
Transfers are as slow as a stopping train; customers still encounter serious complications with system time-out, and withdrawals (either through ATMs or across the counter) are a phantasm. Undue delays associated with credit processing and account opening cause hapless customers to be up in arms over the ugly situation.
A simple cash deposit takes more than an age to transact. As if that is not harrowing enough, some of them exhibit the unprofessional conduct of cutting short their banking hours usually on the last day of the month to run end-of-month processing.
Then most banks are understaffed. Consequently, the few workers on hand get saddled with jobs meant for persons almost thrice their number. This is remarkably obvious when staff are suddenly redeployed to duty lines other than their regular services to the clientele.
Service delivery at Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) is yet another horrible ordeal which can only be compared with the unsalutary experience of one who lies under the weight of an incubus. There are strings of queues making it hard for withdrawals to be effected. While some ATMs display an out-of-service message on their monitors, others are unable to dispense cash because of poor network services.
Surprisingly, in the midst of the gross inefficiency, banks keep declaring mind-boggling figures as profits and deposits at the expense of their customers. One expects that beyond the pronouncements of prodigious and attractive figures, what the banks should have as a competitive edge over their competitors to guarantee market dominance is how efficient their service delivery is and how customer-friendly they are.
As it is, the misdemeanour of bank workers strikes hapless customers as unbecoming and unlovable. It is an attempt to discredit the familiar aphorism that “the customer is king”. It seems, in this case, that the customers are irrelevant while the bank officials act like kings. Then the gains derivable from the laudable reformation and consolidation of the sector have been rubbished.
Given all the constraints, can it be said that Nigerian banks have sustained the goals of Soludo’s reform initiative? Can it be said that the capacity of banks in the country to develop the economy has been enlarged? Has the distress syndrome been eliminated or reduced?
Although the banks may have achieved a good few of the objectives of the reforms as they possibly can, effective service delivery and good customer relations which should be the nitty-gritty of any transformation in that sector have remained unattained. It is an indication that Nigerian banks, despite their deceitful advertisements and perception management, only pay lip service to “best practices” in 21st-Century banking.
By: Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
