Opinion

Should LGAs Be Scrapped?

Published

12 years ago

May 5, 2014

The Committee on Political Restructuring in the
ongoing National Conference, recently recommended the scrapping of the third tier of government.
Expectedly, mixed reactions have trailed the advice. Some Port Harcourt residents spoke with our Chief Correspondent, Calista Ezeaku on the controversial issue. Our photographer, Ibioye Diama captured their images.

Mr Ariobiobara Bestman – Estate Surveyor/ASSBIFI Unit President
Local government is very important because it is the third tier of government, the grassroot government. So I think the idea of scrapping local governments is not a welcome development. If local governments are scrapped, it is going to bring deficiency to grassroot development because local government staff are people within the local government who ordinarily wouldn’t have gotten to the state level employment competitive setting. Local government has helped in reducing rural/urban drift. In the past, a lot of people go to the urban centres for white collar jobs but local governments have made themselves very fundamental in the way and manner that they have brought a reduction in such drift.
Agreed, most of the local government chairmen share their monthly allocations. We have so many local governments that are deficient in development, the pace of development is very slow.
However, scrapping local governments wouldn’t be the solution. When you have a defective setting, scrapping is not a solution. Rearrangement of the administrative pattern is the best solution. When you scrap, you have not really solved the problem. You will have a lot of problems to contend with – employment problems, rural development problems.
So, I’m of the opinion that we should not scrap the local governments, rather there should be checks and balances in the administration of the local governments. For instance, let certain percentage of local government funds be used by the chairmen in setting up rural industries. That will create more employment and boost the local government setting.
If local governments are scrapped, we will miss a lot – the hustling and bustling of local government administration, those that inhabit in the local government areas will desert the local governments and life in the local governments will be worst than what it is today.

Comrade Ibali Ferdinand – NULGE chairman, Ahoada East LGA.
What those people who are agitating for the scrapping of local government failed to understand is that we have three tiers of government in Nigeria, viz; federal, state and local governments. And the local government is the grassroot government. If you have any problem in the community, it is the local government that wades into that matter to settle it. If there is crisis in the community, the state government will find it difficult to come and settle that matter.It is the local government that does that most of the time.
So the agitation for the scrapping of local governments or putting them under the state government is uncalled for. And what will happen to the workers of the local government areas if scrapped? Most of the people in the communities are feeding from these people. For instance, the councillors give helping hand to these people. You cannot even see the state assembly men in the communities. It is the local government chairmen that know the problems of the people in the rural areas. There is an adage that when you see a tree from a distance you will not know that tree, but when you go nearer, you can tell what type of tree it is.
That is exactly what is happening in local governments. And you don’t expect the local government chairmen to be in the offices, every time. And I think it is a bad insinuation that local governments are where monies are shared.
It is not a true fact. When money from the federal comes, they sit in F and GPC, where distribution is made. Salaries, contracts and other allowances, are paid. The chairman does not even have the right to stay in his office and determine the distribution of funds of the local government.
As I earlier said, LGAs are set up to bring about development in the local areas, some LGAs that have money are carrying out some projects like roads, mono pumps, bore-holes and others. Now if you go ahead and scrap LGAs, these things will be stopped, the workers of the LGAs will lose their jobs, their dependants will suffer. Unemployment is a major problem in Nigeria, and the people that have jobs you want to lay them off, what do you think will happen in the country? Scrapping of local governments will even bring more problems to Nigeria. It will not help the country.
Instead of putting the local government under the state government or scrapping it, they should give LGAs autonomy and set up an institution that should monitor them.

Kubi Enyie _ Public Servant.
It will not be in the best interest of the country to scrap the local government. It might lead to increase in crime rate and youth restiveness. You know many youth are close to the local government. Most of them benefit from the local government, from the chairmen, the councillors and the people that work there.
If you scrap LGAs, you will be depriving these people a source of income. So it is not possible.
It is not fair to scrap LGAs. Whoever came up with the idea of scrapping local governments must have an evil mind. There is no local government in the state that does not have ongoing development projects.
The chairmen of all the 23 local government areas in Rivers State are performing very well. If you move round you can see ongoing projects. The local government should be made autonomous.
It shouldn’t be attached to the state government. If it is federal government that is funding the LGAs, then, the federal government should have a body that will regulate the local government activities, not the state. For instance, if I’m the one paying you, and someone else is supervising you, it is not a good understanding. I know how much I gave to you and I’m supposed to be the one to supervise you to know what and what you used the money for.
So what I am saying is that the local government should remain.They should not scrap local government. And the federal government that finances the local government should set up a regulating body to monitor the activities of the LGAs not the state and they should scrap the joint account arrangement. There are some local government areas in this country that only pay workers salary, they don’t even know how much they receive from the federal government in a particular month. The state government only gives them salaries for the workers and other activities in the council alone. There cannot be development of the LGAs under such arrangement. But here in Rivers State, the state government is doing what it is supposed to do. It does not tamper with local government funds.

Egondu Nwoko – Civil Servant.
Local governments cannot be scrapped now. What will happen to the staff of the councils of the local governments if scrapped? Where will they work? Local governments should remain a distinct body as it is now. It should not be merged with the state, put under the control of the state or whatever. It is as important as any other tier of government.

Kingsley Micheal – Student
I don’t really know much about local government system in Nigeria. All I know is that it is the third tier of the government and it caters for grassroot development. But I don’t think they’ve been doing that. I have not seen any road or any tangible project said to be carried out in my own local government area and others.
The workers and even the Chairman hardly go to work. Many of them do not even reside in the local government. As far as I am concerned, the political system we have in Nigeria whereby political godfathers install local government chairmen and expect them to share the monthly allocation with them, makes the local governments irrelevant because after sharing the money, there is nothing left for the development of the area. Putting the local government under the state government will actually reduce cost of governance. But you see, there is corruption everywhere in Nigeria so the alleged corrupt practices, lack of commitment in the local government might not change much under the control of the state government. What we need is a total overhauling of the entire system.

Opinion

Kudos Gov Fubara

Published

19 hours ago

January 2, 2026

The Tide

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area. This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.

The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people. He said, “our isolation is over.” That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.

The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.

Samuel Ebiye

Opinion

… And It Came To Pass

Published

19 hours ago

January 2, 2026

The Tide

Quote:“Leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation.”

Tell it in Rivers State, publish it in the streets of Port Harcourt, so the daughters of the State could rejoice, and the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph and know that Fubara is not vindictive”. And it came to pass that Rivers State emerged from one of the most delicate chapters in its political journey, the period of emergency rule that spanned from March 18 to September 18, 2025. It was a season that tested institutions, strained loyalties, and exposed the fragile balance between power and principle. During that time, the suspended Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara DSSRS, was widely believed to have suffered not only political setbacks but personal betrayal, allegedly from some top civil servants within the state apparatus. These were individuals expected to uphold neutrality and professionalism, yet were accused in public opinion of taking sides against the very government they served.

As the emergency rule ended and Governor Fubara resumed office, expectations were shaped less by policy and more by emotion. Many assumed that revenge would quietly find expression through governance. The loudest suspicion centered on the 2025 Christmas bonus of ?100,000 traditionally paid to each worker. The thinking was simple and cynical: a wounded governor would surely withhold goodwill. Some voices even mocked workers openly hoping that the governor would refuse to pay the bonus. To them, denial of the bonus would serve as proof of political strength and justified retaliation. In reality, such thinking revealed a troubling desire to see governance reduced to personal vendetta. Yet, it came to pass, the governor chose a path that confounded suspicion. Against all expectations, the 2025 Christmas bonus was paid.

That single decision quietly but firmly reframed the narrative. It showed a leader focused on governance rather than grudges, on institutional continuity rather than emotional satisfaction. The payment was not a favor, nor was it a concession; it was a statement that public administration must rise above personal injury. By honoring the bonus, Governor Fubara demonstrated that leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation. He made it clear that workers’ welfare would not become collateral damage in political disagreements. This action also served as a moral rebuke to those who celebrated division and hoped for punishment. Governance is not validated by the suffering of workers, nor is leadership strengthened by withholding entitlements. At the same time, the issue of alleged sycophancy and betrayal within the civil service cannot be brushed aside. If proven, such conduct deserves firm, lawful, and institutional correction. Civil servants are bound by duty to the state, not to political conspiracies or shifting loyalties.

However, justice must never be confused with revenge. The strength of governance lies in correcting wrongs without destroying the system itself. Governor Fubara’s restraint suggested an understanding that the future of Rivers State mattered more than settling scores. For workers, this moment carried an important lesson. Celebration should be rooted in good governance, not in the expectation of another’s downfall. Rejoicing in rumors of denial or punishment undermines the very stability that protects workers’ welfare. Public service thrives where professionalism, mutual respect, and accountability are upheld. Pettiness, gossip, and political scheming only weaken institutions and erode trust. History often remembers leaders not for the crises they inherit, but for the character they display in response. In paying the 2025 Christmas bonus, Governor Fubara chose legacy over impulse, maturity over malice.

And so, it came to pass that focus defeated revenge, governance triumphed over bitterness, and Rivers State was reminded that true leadership is proven when restraint is expected least but delivered most. Beyond the symbolism of the Christmas bonus lies a deeper question about the kind of political culture Rivers State intends to cultivate in the years ahead. Periods of emergency rule, anywhere in the world, often leave behind residues of suspicion, fear, and silent realignments. Institutions do not emerge untouched; individuals recalibrate loyalties, some out of conviction, others out of self-preservation. What distinguishes stable democracies from fragile ones is not the absence of such moments, but the discipline with which leadership manages their aftermath. River.

King Onunwor

Opinion

That Withdrawal of Police Orderlies From VIPs

Published

19 hours ago

January 2, 2026

The Tide

Quote:”Balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk in a country where the majority of citizens are still under-protected.”

The Presidential announcement on the removal of police orderlies from persons in authority and their relations ( Very Important Persons ) last month came as a relief to many Nigerians who felt deprived of one major role of government ; security of lives and property.The higher population of Nigerians missed needed security because the VIPs and the VVIPs kept retinue of Police Officers totalling over 100 ,000 to themselves and their family members as if they are all that matter while some communities under attack of terrorists have no single unit of police station located there in. While many hailed the announcement , some said perhaps the government has just woken up to her major responsibility of securing the lives and property of all citizens while many expressed indifference on the note that it may be one of those pronouncements which come only in words but no action .Many keep their fingers crossed watching how it will play out , how Mr President will go about the implementation of the seemingly dicey policy .

Benjamin Franklin said “well said is better than well done ” It is sufficient today to say that many Nigerians including me are still waiting and watching to see how well and how long this return of the Police service to the ordinary people will go . Wishing hopes will not be crashed , It is note worthy, that the recent complaints by the VIPs of being exposed to attacks may in a way affect the action on implementation. Recently, at Senate plenary , another worrisome angle came up as Senator Abdul Ningi coming through a motion disclosed that he had only one police officer attached to him ( his office ) and that the officer was recalled the week before following Mr President’s directive . Senator Ningi said the withdrawal exposed him to high risks but underscored the angle that while his orderly was recalled , many other politicians , men and women in authority, business concerns foreigners and even children of some VIPs are still enjoying retinue of police protection ( officially attached to them ).

It’s note worthy also that the Deputy Senate President , Distinguished Senator Jibrin Barau, who presided over the session revealed that the leadership of both chambers are already in discussion with President Tinubu on the need to exempt the law makers from the new policy . Senator Ningi may not be wrong . After all he emphasized he is okay provided that the removal of the Police Orderlies be done across board . Senator Barau noted that talks are on over the issue of law makers’ in line with international practice . Further details from the Presidency noted that Presiding officers will retain their police officers , others would have Civil Defense officers ( NSCDC) as orderlies while any other VIP who feels he or she deserves personal police protection should get clearance from his office . In the midst of all issues weighing in on the proper implementation , it becomes necessary to bear in mind that the decision hinges on the realization that Nigeria has peculiar security issues (of kidnappings, banditry, and terrorism.) and that majority of Nigerians are under protected.

More so, that if well implemented, Police officers will focus on core duties; even as 30,000 new police officers are to recruited to enhance security .That implementation must be made in a way that leaves no room.for selective treatment loss of confidence and controversies. Looking at previous attempts of implementation of this policy gives faint hope as several attempts consistently failed . Former IGPs like Tafa Balogun (2003), Ogbonnaya Onovo (2009), and Ibrahim Idris (2018) tried the policy but all failed due to political resistance from various angles. All the failed attempts were tied to lack of political will mostly due to the fact that the directives came from police chiefs, not the president. Selective Enforcement was another killer to the policy as partial implementation met resistance and later reversal . Egbetokun (2023) and Adamu (2020) saw minimal impact.

Further more entrenched corruption in the system saw Politicians and VIPs quietly regain police escorts due to ‘transactional economics”and pressure. Worse still the mindset of the police officers withdrawn didn’t help the policy Underpaid police prioritize VIP duties for extra benefits. Many wish President Tinubu’s move can break this cycle. As at today, he still insists the move is non-negotiable while stressing collaboration with states to upgrade training facilities. As citizens look forward to success of the policy without undue exposure of both sides, balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk. Talk fades ; action echoes. How the Presidency implements this policy. has much to tell on the governments stand on national / community security , choice of priority and the ability to stand uncomprised . The known goal is clear: The outcome is not yet certain. Fingers crossed , we await . Definitely , time will tell.

By: Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi.

s State stood at such a crossroads in September 2025. The temptation to rule with a long memory and a heavy hand was real. Yet, the choice made signaled a preference for healing over hardening. Leadership after crisis demands more than administrative competence; it requires moral clarity.

Governor Fubara’s decision reminded the state that authority is not best exercised through silent punishment or selective generosity. Rather, it is strengthened when rules remain rules, irrespective of personal injury. By keeping faith with workers, the government preserved an essential firewall between politics and public service. That firewall, once breached, turns governance into a battlefield where livelihoods become weapons. Rivers State narrowly avoided that descent. In doing so, it affirmed that institutions must outlive tempers, and governance must not mirror the bitterness of political seasons. This moment also invites sober introspection within the civil service itself. Allegations of partisanship, if left unresolved, corrode professionalism and weaken public confidence. A civil service that drifts into political camps loses its moral authority and operational effectiveness.

Therefore, reform, where necessary, should be guided by due process, transparency, and institutional review—not whispers, witch-hunts, or mob verdicts. Accountability strengthens systems when it is fair; it destroys them when it is arbitrary. The restraint shown by the executive places a corresponding burden on administrative leadership to restore discipline, neutrality, and pride in public service. For the wider political class and the commentariat, the episode serves as a caution against normalizing cruelty as strategy. The eagerness with which some anticipated workers’ suffering revealed a dangerous appetite for scorched-earth politics. When governance becomes a spectator sport where pain is cheered and deprivation is weaponized, society inches toward moral exhaustion. Rivers State has seen enough turbulence to know that stability is not sustained by triumphalism, but by restraint.

The lesson is simple yet profound: power is fleeting, but institutions endure; leaders pass, but precedents remain. In the end, the payment of the 2025 Christmas bonus was more than a fiscal act—it was a civic statement. It told workers they were not expendable. It told political actors that revenge would not be policy. And it told the state that maturity in leadership is not weakness, but strength under control. In a climate where many expected fire, restraint prevailed; where bitterness was predicted, balance emerged. Thus, Rivers State was offered a rare reminder that governance, at its best, is an act of discipline, and leadership, at its highest, is the courage to rise above provocation.