Connect with us

Opinion

Nafdac And Appropriate Legal Framework

Published

12 years ago

on

The imperativeness of an ideally cultivated ,strengthened
and absolutely cherishable legal framework to backup the ongoing strategic and monumental exploits of the nation’s health-boosting and life saving organ- the National Agency for Food, Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) cannot be underplayed. In line with the saying that where there are no laws, there are no sins, it has become imperative for the Nigerian Government through its parliamentary and judicial arm to re-strengthen the legal instrument backing the agency’s enforcement activities.
The considerable age long adage which says “spare  the rod and spoil the child” is emphatic of the need for appropriate, or better put, commensurate disciplinary measures for undisciplined acts. Consequently, a country that lacks strong anti unpatriotic acts laws cannot effectively maximize its Judicial machinery to inculcate patriotism and absolute discipline in its citizenry. Emphatically, drug adulterators or fakers are “murderers” who deserve no less than capital punishment when caught, prosecuted and eventually convicted by the law courts. In other words, this act could be tagged wilfull determination of a group or individuals to commit a grievous act of “genocide” by placing greed and love for money above  consideration for human life.
It has  therefore become  imperative for government to re-strengthen its commitment towards the ongoing NAFDAC engineered war against pharmaceutical products counterfeiters by urgently mandating the Nigerian Parliament to critically overhaul and reform the agency’s enabling laws such that it would allow for very stiff and commensurate penalties to be adopted for persons found guilty of pharmaceutical, as well as NAFDAC regulated products faking.
For clarity of my thought and purpose in this presentation, reference must be made to the practice in countries like India and China where majority of the nations pharmaceutical products are imported. For instance, owing to protest and complaints from the Nigerian government through NAFDAC under the leadership of Dr. Paul B. Orhii, the government of China had to sentence six of their citizens to death for manufacturing and shipping into Nigeria, cloned and counterfeited pharmaceutical products.
It would be recalled that in-view of the passionate status  of the international community towards its commitment to human right issues which recently culminated in their call for the abolition and expunging of the  “death sentence” clause from constitution and laws of countries worldwide, India and China have entrenched a capital punishment of “Life jail” for convicted drug counterfeiters. The onus now rests on Nigeria to outrightly exhibit her resentment for drug fakers in action by entrenching punitive anti-counterfeiting measures in the laws regulating NAFDAC operations. Notably, it would be frustrating for patriotic and committed NAFDAC officials to embark on laborious, energy-sapping and highly demanding enforcement exercises leading to apprehension, prosecuting and conviction of counterfeiters of the agency’s regulated products, particularly drugs, only for such offenders to be treated with kid gloves by the Nation’s law courts through the imposition of laughable sentences and fines.  The bone of contention however is that events seems to have overtaken certain provisions of the agency’s enabling laws particularly those that have to do with the weight and size of punishment to be metted out to persons  found to have acted contrarily or sabotaged the agency’s efforts at entrenching and sustaining a healthy society for all.
All over the world, the wealth of a nation is predominantly determined by the health of the mass of its citizenry. A little wonder that globally, “good health is considered as good wealth”. In Nigeria,  the commitment of the President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan led democratic administration towards guaranteeing, providing and sustaining a healthy Nigerian populace through critical overhaul and repositioning of the nation’s health boosting machineries is arguably not in doubt.
Established and empowered by decree no 15 of 1993 as amended, and now ACT cap NI laws of the federation of Nigeria(LFN ) 2004 and consequently accorded a comprehensive mandate which empowers it to regulate as well as control the manufacture, importation, exportation, distribution, advertisement, sale and use of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, chemicals and packaged water, the agency has remained focused and maximally committed, not limited towards ensuring that the aspirations of its founding fathers are met, but also to re-strategize and reposition it to conveniently confront modern practices and challenges in global healthcare delivery practices.
The “monumental footprints” so far engraved by the agency in the nation’s healthcare delivery sector through dynamic innovations and sophisticated approaches towards confronting and conquering healthcare delivery retarding “cankerworms” are indeed laudable and will continuously remain memorable in the minds of every Nigerian. However, the bases of this presentation which incidentally appears to be the bone of contention is that events in global healthcare services fortification seems to have overtaken the age long legal policies governing NAFDAC operations.
Unquestionably, the amendment seeking aspect of the Agency enabling laws is particularly the clauses which have to do with the weight, size, degree of punishment, penalty stipulated for persons found contravening the agency’s Acts by acting contrarily or sabotaging its efforts towards entrenching and maximally sustaining a healthy society for all.
Come to think of it, having been endowed with a vibrant and ideally focused chief executive whose leadership style encompasses the fostering of an all inclusive healthcare management strategy and thereby successfully striking a chord with the Nigeria populace by guaranteeing a new and modernized hope hinged on deft management of resources, apparently anchored on discipline, accessibility, transparency, there is indeed no doubt that a new vista  has unquestionably been opened in the annals of Nigeria’s healthcare services sanitisation and fortification.
But all those  achievements of NAFDAC will amount to  nothing  if urgent measures are not adopted by the nation’s Judiciary  and the National  Assembly to alter the disgusting and out rightly laughable status- quo which amount to treating capital health offences with levity.
A good example in this regard is the recent assault on officials of NAFDAC who were on inspection of a bakery in Osogbo, Osun State capital during which a baker, Mr. Afolabi Narudeen was found to be using deadly and cancer causing flour enhancer, popularly known as potassium bromate, outlawed by  NAFDAC in accordance with international health practice.
A Federal High Court in Osogbo convicted,  Mr. Afolabi Nurudeen  to one year imprisonment with an option of N4,000 (Four thousand Naira) in lieu.
Although the judgment which eventually resulted in very light sentence is not the fault of the Judge as it was in accordance with the nations legal provisions in that regard, it is a  very ridiculous punishment which lacked the strength and ability to forestall future similar occurrence.
Conclusively, it would not amount to an over statement to posit that the laws establishing the National Agency for Food, Drug Administration and Control – NAFDAC is outdated and obsolete and thus the urgent need for its review to bring it in tune with modern practice in health care delivery globally. The current precarious situation has brought about the need for a concerted effort towards tackling this anti-enforcement catalyst through the provision of a more effective and very pro-active legal policy frame work.
Ikhilae is a Lagos based Public Affairs Analyst .

 

Martins F.O. Ikhilae

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

5 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Opinion

… And It Came To Pass

Published

5 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Quote:“Leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation.”
Tell it  in Rivers State, publish it  in the streets of Port Harcourt, so  the daughters of the State could rejoice, and the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph and know that Fubara is not vindictive”. And it came to pass that Rivers State emerged from one of the most delicate chapters in its political journey, the period of emergency rule that spanned from March 18 to September 18, 2025. It was a season that tested institutions, strained loyalties, and exposed the fragile balance between power and principle. During that time, the suspended Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara DSSRS, was widely believed to have suffered not only political setbacks but personal betrayal, allegedly from some top civil servants within the state apparatus. These were individuals expected to uphold neutrality and professionalism, yet were accused in public opinion of taking sides against the very government they served.
As the emergency rule ended and Governor Fubara resumed office, expectations were shaped less by policy and more by emotion. Many assumed that revenge would quietly find expression through governance. The loudest suspicion centered on the 2025 Christmas bonus of ?100,000 traditionally paid to each worker. The thinking was simple and cynical: a wounded governor would surely withhold goodwill. Some voices even mocked workers  openly hoping that the governor would refuse to pay the bonus. To them, denial of the bonus would serve as proof of political strength and justified retaliation. In reality, such thinking revealed a troubling desire to see governance reduced to personal vendetta. Yet,  it came to pass, the governor chose a path that confounded suspicion. Against all expectations, the 2025 Christmas bonus was paid.
That single decision quietly but firmly reframed the narrative. It showed a leader focused on governance rather than grudges, on institutional continuity rather than emotional satisfaction. The payment was not a favor, nor was it a concession; it was a statement that public administration must rise above personal injury. By honoring the bonus, Governor Fubara demonstrated that leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation. He made it clear that workers’ welfare would not become collateral damage in political disagreements. This action also served as a moral rebuke to those who celebrated division and hoped for punishment. Governance is not validated by the suffering of workers, nor is leadership strengthened by withholding entitlements. At the same time, the issue of alleged sycophancy and betrayal within the civil service cannot be brushed aside. If proven, such conduct deserves firm, lawful, and institutional correction. Civil servants are bound by duty to the state, not to political conspiracies or shifting loyalties.
However, justice must never be confused with revenge. The strength of governance lies in correcting wrongs without destroying the system itself. Governor Fubara’s restraint suggested an understanding that the future of Rivers State mattered more than settling scores. For workers, this moment carried an important lesson. Celebration should be rooted in good governance, not in the expectation of another’s downfall. Rejoicing in rumors of denial or punishment undermines the very stability that protects workers’ welfare. Public service thrives where professionalism, mutual respect, and accountability are upheld. Pettiness, gossip, and political scheming only weaken institutions and erode trust. History often remembers leaders not for the crises they inherit, but for the character they display in response. In paying the 2025 Christmas bonus, Governor Fubara chose legacy over impulse, maturity over malice.
And so, it came to pass that focus defeated revenge, governance triumphed over bitterness, and Rivers State was reminded that true leadership is proven when restraint is expected least but delivered most. Beyond the symbolism of the Christmas bonus lies a deeper question about the kind of political culture Rivers State intends to cultivate in the years ahead. Periods of emergency rule, anywhere in the world, often leave behind residues of suspicion, fear, and silent realignments. Institutions do not emerge untouched; individuals recalibrate loyalties, some out of conviction, others out of self-preservation. What distinguishes stable democracies from fragile ones is not the absence of such moments, but the discipline with which leadership manages their aftermath. River.
King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Opinion

That Withdrawal of Police   Orderlies  From VIPs

Published

5 days ago

on

January 2, 2026

By

Quote:”Balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk in a country where the majority of citizens are still under-protected.”
The Presidential announcement on the removal of police orderlies from persons in authority and their relations  ( Very Important Persons ) last month came as a relief to many Nigerians who felt deprived    of one major  role of government ; security of lives and property.The higher  population of Nigerians  missed needed security because the VIPs and the VVIPs kept  retinue of Police Officers  totalling over 100 ,000 to  themselves and their family members as if they are all that matter  while some  communities under attack of terrorists  have no single unit of  police station located there in. While many hailed the announcement , some said perhaps the government has just woken up to her major responsibility of securing the lives and property of all  citizens while many expressed indifference on the note that it may be one of those pronouncements which come only in words but no action .Many keep their fingers crossed watching how it will play out , how Mr President  will  go about the implementation of the seemingly dicey  policy .
Benjamin Franklin  said “well said is better than well done ”  It is sufficient today to say that many Nigerians including me are still waiting and watching to see  how well  and how long this  return  of the Police service to the ordinary people will go . Wishing hopes will not be crashed ,  It  is note worthy, that  the recent complaints by the VIPs of being exposed to attacks  may in a way affect the action on implementation. Recently, at Senate plenary , another worrisome  angle came up as Senator Abdul Ningi  coming through a motion    disclosed that he had only one police officer attached to him ( his office ) and that  the officer was recalled the week before following  Mr President’s directive  . Senator Ningi said the withdrawal exposed him to high risks but underscored the angle that while his orderly  was recalled , many other politicians , men  and women in authority, business concerns   foreigners  and even children of some  VIPs are still enjoying retinue of police protection ( officially attached to them ).
 It’s note  worthy also that the Deputy Senate President , Distinguished Senator Jibrin Barau,  who presided  over  the session revealed that the  leadership of both chambers are already in discussion with President Tinubu on the need  to exempt  the law makers  from the new policy .  Senator Ningi may not be  wrong . After all he emphasized he is okay  provided that the removal of the Police Orderlies be done across board . Senator Barau noted that talks are on  over the issue of law makers’    in line with international practice . Further details from the Presidency  noted  that   Presiding officers  will retain their  police officers ,  others would have Civil Defense  officers ( NSCDC) as orderlies while  any other VIP who feels he or she deserves personal police protection should get clearance from  his office . In the midst of all  issues weighing in on the proper implementation , it becomes necessary  to bear in mind that  the decision  hinges on  the realization that Nigeria has peculiar security issues (of kidnappings, banditry, and terrorism.) and that  majority of Nigerians   are under protected.
More so, that if well  implemented, Police officers will focus on core duties; even as 30,000 new police officers are to  recruited to enhance security .That implementation  must be made in a  way that leaves no room.for selective  treatment loss of confidence  and  controversies.  Looking at previous attempts of  implementation  of this policy  gives faint hope  as several  attempts consistently failed . Former  IGPs like Tafa Balogun (2003), Ogbonnaya Onovo (2009), and Ibrahim Idris (2018) tried  the policy but all  failed due to political resistance from various angles. All the failed attempts  were tied to lack of political will  mostly due to the fact that the directives came from police chiefs, not the president. Selective Enforcement was another killer to the policy  as  partial implementation  met  resistance   and   later  reversal . Egbetokun (2023) and Adamu (2020) saw minimal impact.
Further more entrenched corruption in the system saw  Politicians and VIPs quietly regain police escorts due to ‘transactional economics”and pressure. Worse still the mindset of the  police officers  withdrawn didn’t help the policy Underpaid police prioritize VIP duties for extra benefits. Many wish President Tinubu’s move can  break this cycle.  As at today, he  still  insists the move is non-negotiable while stressing collaboration with states to upgrade training facilities. As citizens look forward to  success of the policy  without undue exposure of both sides, balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk. Talk fades ; action echoes.  How the Presidency  implements this policy.  has  much to tell on the governments stand on national / community  security , choice of priority and the ability to   stand uncomprised . The known  goal is clear:  The outcome is  not yet certain.  Fingers crossed , we await . Definitely , time will tell.
By: Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi.
s State stood at such a crossroads in September 2025. The temptation to rule with a long memory and a heavy hand was real. Yet, the choice made signaled a preference for healing over hardening. Leadership after crisis demands more than administrative competence; it requires moral clarity.
 Governor Fubara’s decision reminded the state that authority is not best exercised through silent punishment or selective generosity. Rather, it is strengthened when rules remain rules, irrespective of personal injury. By keeping faith with workers, the government preserved an essential firewall between politics and public service. That firewall, once breached, turns governance into a battlefield where livelihoods become weapons. Rivers State narrowly avoided that descent. In doing so, it affirmed that institutions must outlive tempers, and governance must not mirror the bitterness of political seasons. This moment also invites sober introspection within the civil service itself. Allegations of partisanship, if left unresolved, corrode professionalism and weaken public confidence. A civil service that drifts into political camps loses its moral authority and operational effectiveness.
Therefore, reform, where necessary, should be guided by due process, transparency, and institutional review—not whispers, witch-hunts, or mob verdicts. Accountability strengthens systems when it is fair; it destroys them when it is arbitrary. The restraint shown by the executive places a corresponding burden on administrative leadership to restore discipline, neutrality, and pride in public service. For the wider political class and the commentariat, the episode serves as a caution against normalizing cruelty as strategy. The eagerness with which some anticipated workers’ suffering revealed a dangerous appetite for scorched-earth politics. When governance becomes a spectator sport where pain is cheered and deprivation is weaponized, society inches toward moral exhaustion. Rivers State has seen enough turbulence to know that stability is not sustained by triumphalism, but by restraint.
The lesson is simple yet profound: power is fleeting, but institutions endure; leaders pass, but precedents remain. In the end, the payment of the 2025 Christmas bonus was more than a fiscal act—it was a civic statement. It told workers they were not expendable. It told political actors that revenge would not be policy. And it told the state that maturity in leadership is not weakness, but strength under control. In a climate where many expected fire, restraint prevailed; where bitterness was predicted, balance emerged. Thus, Rivers State was offered a rare reminder that governance, at its best, is an act of discipline, and leadership, at its highest, is the courage to rise above provocation.
Continue Reading

Trending