Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Why Marginal Fields Programme Failed

Published

on

The Federal Government in 2005 initiated the Marginal Fields Programme (MFP) to encourage indigenous participation in the oil and gas industry in Nigeria. This is after decades of monopoly by the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) and other international oil companies that came in later.

In a bid round that year (2005) for the 24 marginal fields, the federal government issued 30 licences; out of which only seven marginal fields have been developed and attained production, according to  the Managing Director of Treasure Energy Resource Limited,Dr Eddie Wikina,  a Rivers State-owned oil and gas company.

Wikina explained that with only seven developed marginal fields out of that number, it shows that MFP success rate was less than 30 per cent, therefore the full potential of the programme has not been achieved.

He noted that the objectives of the programme which were to increase Nigerian local participation in the industry and enhance economic growth have only been partially realised and it is not good, he added.

Variety of factors, according to Wikina were attributed to the failure of the MFP, one of which was basing award more on political and patronage considerations rather than on more business related issues. Some companies that were given these licences have father, mother and children as operators which have no know-how on oil business but were awarded marginal fields because they are related to one big politician or the other, he said.

Another factor that has made the MFP a failure is that the operators lacked technical competence, the knowledge of the operating environment, and business and no financial capacity to finance the business. Indigenous oil companies have not broken even in terms of attracting requisite funding and infrastructural capacity to explore these marginal fields. This has defeated the objective of increasing the participation of Nigerians in order to boost the economy of local areas and creating jobs, as the financiers were mostly foreign oil companies.

He explained that the seven functional marginal fields were headed by people with technical competence and financed by foreign companies. Citing Afren and Matt Resources as instances, he said Afren was a United Kingdom Company while Matt Resources was a Canadian Company and they provide technical and functional support  to operators of the functional marginal fields.

Others that have recorded success, he added, headed by technical professionals include platforms, Energia, Mid Western and Britannia-U.

‘Others are deficient in technical capacity. They basically have political patronage and this cannot bring oil from the ground. They are not ready to spend money on technical expertise but run on boards that are  based on family affiliations with no oil and gas experience’, Wikina explained.

He advised that during the next bid round, the Federal Government should play down on patronage and political sentiments and consideration should be given to qualified companies and indigenous persons from oil bearing states. This is the only way, he stated, that they can contribute to the economic development of the states and create jobs.

Explaining further he said an analysis of the current marginal fields awarded shows that only 30 per cent goes to the South South, 24 per cent to the North, 30 per cent to the South West and 15 per cent to the South East. In terms of the major oil blocs the South South which is where the oil is coming from,  has 13 per cent as its quota, North has 29 per cent, South West 30 per cent while the South East gets 19 per cent.

A further breakdown of the quota that goes to the South South shows that most of the ownership belong to those from Delta States while Rivers, Bayelsa and Akwa Ibom States are marginalised.

He urged the Governors of these three South South States to redirect their focus and walk together to see that this imbalance was addressed as this is denying the region  economic development.

He added that marginal field operators should be, based on the Nigerian Content Act, compelled to establish functional offices with decision authority within the state hosting the marginal fields or close to the areas of operations as failure to do this is denying the host states and areas of operations economic development.

He argued that thousands of jobs will be created in the Niger Delta  States which host oil fields if these offices are located within the states, and if dormant oil fields held by major oil companies were released for development and brought to production.

There is this trend that the oil majors and federal government have concentrated on the high-yields fields. For instance, experts are unanimous on the fact that Abia State’s oil and gas potentials were under-exploited as out of 103 oil fields, only about 50 are producing. The Abia case is applicable to most oil fields in the South South.

The TERL boss also pointed out that putting into consideration the suggestions could help address the current spate of militancy and insecurity in the country as it would ensure that the right environment is created to facilitate investment which results in economic growth.

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

NERC, OYSERC  Partner To Strengthen Regulation

Published

on

THE Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has stressed the need for strict adherence to due process in operationalizing state electricity regulatory bodies.
It, however, pledged institutional and technical support to the Oyo State Electricity Regulatory Commission (OYSERC).
The Chairman, NERC, Dr Musiliu Oseni, who made the position known while receiving the OYSERC delegation, emphasised that the establishment and take-off of state commissions must align fully with the law setting them up.
Oseni said that the NERC remains committed to partnering with State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERC) to guarantee their institutional stability, operational effectiveness and long-term success.
He insisted that regulatory coordination between federal and state institutions is critical in the evolving electricity market framework, noting that collaboration would help to build strong institutions capable of delivering sustainable outcomes for the sector.
Also speaking, the Acting Chairman, OYSERC and leader of the delegation, Prof. Dahud Kehinde Shangodoyin, said that the visit was aimed at formally introducing the commission’s acting leadership to the NERC and laying the groundwork for a productive working relationship.
Shangodoyin said , the acting members were appointed to provide direction and lay a solid foundation for the commission during its transitional period, pending the appointment of substantive members.
“We are here to formally introduce the acting leadership of OYSERC and to establish a working relationship with NERC as we commence our regulatory responsibilities,” he said.
He acknowledged NERC’s readiness to provide technical and regulatory support, particularly in the area of capacity development, describing the backing as essential for strengthening the commission’s operations at this formative stage.
“We appreciate NERC’s willingness to support us technically and regulatorily, especially in building our capacity during this transition,” he added.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

NLC Faults FG’s 3trn Dept Payment To GenCos

Published

on

The Nigeria Labour Congress and the Association of Power Generation Companies have engaged in a showdown over federal government legacy debt.
NLC president Joe Ajaero has faulted the federal government’s move to give GenCos N3 trillion from the Federation account as repayment for a power sector legacy debt, which amounts to N6.5 trillion.
In a statement on Thursday, Ajaero said the Federal Government proposed the N3 trillion payment and the N6 trillion debt as a heist and grand deception to shortchange the Nigerian people.
“Nigerians cannot and should not continue to pay for darkness,” Ajaero stated.
Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Association of Power Generation Companies, APGC, Dr. Joy Ogaji, said Ajaero may be ignorant of the true state of things, insisting that the federal government is indebted to GenCos to the tune of N6.5 trillion.
She feared the longstanding conflict could result in the eventual collapse of the country’s power.
According to her, the federal government’s N501 billion issuance of power sector bonds is inadequate to address its accumulated debt.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

PENGASSAN Rejects Presidential EO On Oil, Gas Revenue Remittance  ……… Seeks PIA Review 

Published

on

The Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria(PENGASSAN) Festus Osifo, has faulted the public explanation surrounding the Federal Government’s recent oil revenue Executive Order(EO).
President of the association, Festus Osifo, argued that claims about a 30 per cent deduction from petroleum sharing contract revenue are misleading.
Recall that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, last Wednesday, February 18, signed the executive order directing that royalty oil, tax oil, profit oil, profit gas, and other revenues due to the Federation under production sharing, profit sharing, and risk service contracts be paid directly into the Federation Account.
The order also scrapped the 30 per cent Frontier Exploration Fund under the PIA and stopped the 30 per cent management fee on profit oil and profit gas retained by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.
In his reaction, Osifo, while addressing journalists, in Lagos, Thursday, said the figure being referenced does not represent gross revenue accruing to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.
He explained that revenues from production sharing contracts are subject to several deductions before arriving at what is classified as profit oil or profit gas.
Osifo also urged President Bola Tinubu to withdraw his recently signed Presidential Executive Order to Safeguard Federation Oil and Gas Revenues and Provide Regulatory Clarity, 2026.
He warned that the directive undermines the Petroleum Industry Act and could create uncertainty in the oil and gas industry, insisting that any amendment to the existing legal framework must pass through the National Assembly.
Osifo argued that an executive order cannot override a law enacted by the National Assembly, describing the move as setting a troubling precedent.
“Yes, that is what should be done from the beginning. You can review the laws of a land. There is no law that is perfect,” he said.
He added that the President should constitute a team to review the PIA, identify its strengths and weaknesses, and forward proposed amendments to lawmakers.
“When you get revenue from PSC, you have to make some deductibles. You deduct royalties. You deduct tax. You also deduct the cost of cost recovery. Once you have done that, you will now have what we call profit oil or profit gas. Then that is where you now deduct the 30 per cent,” he stated..
According to him, when the deductions are properly accounted for, the 30 per cent being referenced translates to about two per cent of total revenue from the production sharing contracts.
“In effect, that deduction is about two per cent of the revenue of the PLCs,” he added, maintaining that the explanation presented in the public domain did not accurately reflect the structure of the deductions.
Osifo warned that removing the affected portion of the revenue could have operational implications for NNPC Ltd, noting that the funds are used to meet salary obligations and other internal expenses.
“That two per cent is what NNPC uses to pay salaries and meet some of its obligations.The one you are also removing from the midstream and downstream, it is part of what they use in meeting their internal obligations. So as you are removing this, how are they going to pay salaries?” he queried.
Beyond the immediate impact on the company’s workforce, he cautioned that regulatory uncertainty could affect investor confidence in the sector.
“If the international community and investors lose confidence in Nigeria, it has a way of affecting investment. That should be the direction. You don’t put a cow before the horse,” he added.
According to him, stakeholders, including labour unions and industry operators, should be given the opportunity to make inputs at the National Assembly as part of the amendment process saying “That is how laws are refined,”
Continue Reading

Trending