Editorial
Public Service And Transformation Agenda
In June, last year, two epoch-making events were convoked to fashion the direction of public service in Nigeria. The first was the 41st Conference of Civil Service Commissions in the federation which held in Port Harcourt, between Thursday, June 7 through Saturday, June 9, 2012.
The second was in observance of the Annual Public Service Day, in keeping with the Tangier Declaration that set aside June 23, every year to celebrate the service. Nigeria also marked the day.
The two major events clearly underscore the importance of the public service as the pivot around which government business revolves. The theme of the Port Harcourt event in particular, “The Transformation Agenda and the Public Service in Nigeria,” indeed sought to strike a synergy with the policy direction of the federal government.
It was no surprise therefore, that contributions and eventual resolutions from the conference emphasised, among others, the need for the service to outline imperatives for transformation, key among which are: promotion of effective communication; adherence to rules and Good work – ethics; intergrity and dignity, proacative decisions and indeed expert advice to the political leadership at all times. The others include enabling sub ordinates to key into the reforms and transformations of the federal government and most importantly, the need to create harmonious work relationships with political office holders who may lack knowledge of the operations of the public service.
Like the Port Harcourt event, the June 23 Public Service Day observance in Abuja also built its theme, “Capacity Development for the implementation of the Transformation Agenda,” in tandem with popular expectations of that important service sector.
It was therefore not surprising that Nigeria’s President Goodluck Jonathan seized the opportunity of the Dinner and Awards nite of the 2012 Public Service Day at the Presidential Villa to promise that his administration would improve the capacity of the Public Service with a view to making it a fulcrum for development in the country.
While inviting the Public Service to join in the transformation Agenda of his administration, President Jonathan said Vice President Namadi Sambo and himself only could not do everything and called on all Nigerians to join in saving the country of corrupt practices.
For some reasons, whenever the Public Service is mentioned the issue of corruption is brought up. It is said that the Public Service is the cause of corruption in Nigeria. Even against the cry of Public Servants, some people believe that even the politicians are taught to be corrupt by the Public Servants.
While we do not want to contend with those arguments, we think that assertion makes clear the point that corruption may be very deep in the Public Service. Also obvious is the fact that successive governments in the country have failed to do enough to change the situation.
We think that the Public Service is too important to be left un-protected from corruption. As the engine-room of government activities, the Public Service cannot effectively set standards, enforce rules and meet the dynamic needs of society, if corruption is allowed to dictate its pace.
It is not enough to cry woe and occasionally promise to address the problem of the Public Service, someone needs to confront the issue consciously with a view to salvaging the service. Indeed, if this administration hopes to transform Nigeria, it must first transform the Public Service.
Like the Federal Government, some states have promised to improve the capacity of the Public Service, yet the service is not ICT-compliant uptil now. States like Rivers State actually started a process of reforming the service but whether the real issues in the service would be the ones that would be addressed remains to be seen.
While we cannot hold brief for the Public Service over corrupt practices, poor service delivery, indiscipline and lack of commitment, Nigeria cannot expect to reap from where it had not sown. A country where the only thing that seems to happen is politics cannot do much for her Public Service.
Apart from intimidating the service to the level of servitude, successive governments fail to note that if the Public Service is not better than the private sector, governance would be worse for it. The country need not expect much from a Public Service used, principally, to provide employment instead of facilitate governance.
Also laughable is the conditions of service in the Public Service. Apart from the poor remuneration regime, the average Public Servant has no access to housing, reliable transportation and affordable healthcare. Anyone whose future is not guaranteed, but is exposed to public resource, the temptation can be too much.
If the worker has nothing to lose by way of housing or any other benefit he/she would enjoy at the end of a meritorious service, the worker may not be very productive and would not care how low he/she gets to be relevant in the society. Even those that served well as Public Servants in those days did so because, housing and welfare of the staff were guaranteed.
Only recently, Public Servants were to be paid a new National Minimum Wage and the subject was politicised and manipulated. After claims of harmonisation and the implementation of a new wage many are still asking if what happened was the much talked about new wage.
Till now even some of the rich states have failed to do right or complete the payment of the harmonisation arrears. Under the above circumstance, how can any serious minded people expect any miracle from the Public Service. Sadly, the prospect of receiving their due pension even on retirement is still an issue. Having not received housing loan to build for themselves before retirement, an average Public Servant fears to retire. Clearly, Nigeria can do better.
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
Nigeria joined the world in commemorating the International Day of the Girl-Child on 11 March 2026, an observance dedicated to advancing girls’ rights and amplifying their voices. This year’s theme, “End Child Marriage and Invest in Girls’ Rights,” confronts a deep-rooted injustice and demands an end to sacrificing girls’ futures to prejudice and expediency.
The focus is child marriage, not as an unavoidable misfortune but as a preventable injustice. Though prevalent in many societies, the practice remains particularly troubling in parts of northern Nigeria, where it has become normalised. Reports of girls aged 10 to 13 being married off are disturbing. The controversy surrounding a Nigerian senator and former governor who married a 13-year-old girl further exposed the practice to global scrutiny, yet accountability at home appeared limited. When lawmakers disregard the law, society’s moral compass is compromised.
UNICEF’s statistics reveal the scale of the crisis. Globally, an estimated 650 million women and girls alive today were married before turning 18, while more than 12 million girls enter marriage annually before adulthood. In Nigeria, about 33 per cent of girls marry before 18 and 11 per cent before 15. The prevalence reportedly reaches 63 per cent in Jigawa and Zamfara States and 61 per cent in Sokoto and Katsina. These figures represent millions of childhoods interrupted and futures imperilled.
These statistics explain why the United Nations continues to campaign against child marriage and advocate investment in girls. The consequences are devastating. Girls whose bodies are not fully developed face increased risks of maternal death, obstetric fistula, sexually transmitted infections and psychological trauma. The economic cost is equally significant. A 2017 World Bank and International Centre for Research on Women Study estimated that ending child marriage could generate an additional $7.6 billion in earnings and productivity for Nigeria, as early marriage deprives girls of education, skills, and opportunities to contribute to national development.
Educating a woman benefits the entire society. As a mother, she often becomes her children’s first teacher and a vital influence on their character. An educated mother helps raise enlightened children, just as one candle can light many others without losing its flame. Denying women education undermines families and communities. To expect wisdom while deliberately withholding knowledge is to demand the impossible.
Several reasons are offered for marrying off young girls, including economic hardship, cultural practices and religious beliefs. In some households, daughters are treated as commodities, married early so that their bride price can finance their brothers’ education. While boys enter classrooms, their sisters are sent to matrimonial homes. This discriminatory practice is shortsighted, depriving the nation of half its human potential. A country cannot expect to run effectively after deliberately crippling one side of its capacity.
Beyond these justifications lies the entrenched belief that women ultimately belong in the kitchen, regardless of their education. This outdated notion is demonstrably false. Countries where women lead governments, businesses, research institutions and other sectors show what investment in female talent can achieve. Rwanda’s substantial female parliamentary representation is one example. Confining women to domestic roles limits not only their ambitions but also the nation’s progress.
A girl-child must not surrender her childhood to poverty or prejudice. Some traditions discourage women from attaining educational heights comparable to or greater than those of men, driven by the baseless fear that educated women will disrespect their husbands. Such thinking equates enlightenment with insubordination and empowerment with threat. This patriarchal mindset perpetuates inequality and keeps society trapped in backwardness.
Consequently, some parents consider educating their daughters a waste of resources, likening it to watering another man’s garden. This attitude is deeply misguided. Every girl deserves the opportunity to learn, grow and pursue her dreams. Early marriage mortgages her future, stifles her potential and traps her in circumstances she might otherwise overcome. No society can justify sacrificing a child’s prospects to outdated customs or immediate financial gain.
Ending child marriage must, therefore, go hand in hand with investing in girls’ education, safety and rights. Every girl should have the opportunity to realise her potential. This requires more than annual declarations, billboards, posters and seminars held in air-conditioned halls. Awareness without action is like a cloud without rain: promising, yet incapable of nourishing the ground.
The campaign must move beyond tokenism to practical intervention, particularly at the state level, where the problem is acute. Governments should formulate policies that protect girls and make education accessible. Scholarships, bursaries, conditional cash transfers, school feeding programmes and other incentives can help keep girls in school. When education is affordable and adequately supported, more girls can choose the classroom over the bridal chamber.
Civil society organisations, faith-based groups, and traditional institutions must intensify efforts to challenge child marriage and dismantle harmful beliefs disguised as religious or cultural obligations. Parents must also uphold their responsibility to protect and educate their daughters, despite economic pressures. A society that educates its girls invests in its future; one that marries them off in childhood mortgages that future at an incalculable cost.
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education18 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta19 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers17 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education18 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News20 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News20 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media