Opinion
Okonjo-Iweala And Her Critics
Of all the ministers appointed by President Goodluck Jonathan into his cabinet recently, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala catches my fancy most.
Dr. Okonjo-Iweala was former Minister of Finance under former President Olusegun Obasanjo and was later moved to the Foreign Affairs Ministry. She, however, resigned her appointment in controversial circumstances and returned to the World Bank where she was before her appointment.
The fact that she accepts to serve the nation for the second time is commendable, especially in the face of the prevalent vices in the country. Vices like corruption, kidnapping, terrorism, armed robbery, assassination etc are enough to scare away a woman of her status. Her decision to serve under this situation is, indeed, an act of patriotism.
Okonjo-Iweala had every reason to reject President Jonathan’s invitation to serve. Beside the ills listed above, Nigeria is a country that has little regards for excellence. This explains why mediocrities dominate our socio-political landscape.
Unfortunately, there are Nigerians who think a woman of Okonjo-Iweala’s status, who left her high position as the Managing Director of the World Bank to serve her country should not have been considered for appointment. Her critics are unhappy that she was brought from the diaspora, and that she resigned her first appointment. These reasons are ostensible. They further describe her capability to transform the economy of the country as a bogus claim.
The truth is that Dr. Okonjo-Iweala is feared by some rogue politicians whose business in power is to loot Nigeria dry. The Minister is dreaded by these politicians because of her integrity and uprightness. Many governors and council chairmen are afraid because she publishes their monthly allocations for all Nigerians to see. Legislators and contractors are alarmed because it won’t be business as usual. Her publication of monthly allocations, as far as I am concerned, is to ensure transparency and discourage corruption.
I disagree with those who say Okonjo-Iweala’s importance is over-rated. The antecedent of this woman is well known. She was instrumental to the debt forgiveness Nigeria got during the Obasanjo’s regime. Through her assistance, the country’s 30 billion dollar debt was reduced to 12 billion dollars.
Dr. Okonjo-Iweala’s qualities were equally acknowledged by the World Bank President, Robert Zoeuick who described her exploits at the institution as “Steuar”. He said her desire to serve Nigeria is a “truly big loss for the World Bank but a major gain for Nigeria as it works to craft its economic way forward”.
Okonjo-Iweala’s efforts to assist developing countries particularly in Africa are widely recognised. That is why her wealth of experience is expected to be of benefit to Nigeria. She acknowledged this fact when she appeared before the Senate for screening. She told the legislators that she was returning to promote Nigerians’ welfare and create jobs.
Not only did the Finance Minister make those promises to Nigerians, she also told the lawmakers that Nigeria was spending beyond her means.
From the foregoing, it is clear that she will introduce measures to facilitate fiscal controls, reduce wasteful expenditure, promote infrastructural development and generally enhance Nigeria’s economy.
There is no doubt, therefore, that it is only corrupt Nigerians who will find fault with these well-intentioned declarations of the minister.
Fortunately for us, Okonjo-Iweala returned to Nigeria when the country’s external reserve has nose-dived drastically and in want of redemption. So, rather than engaging in unnecessary and arm-chair criticisms, it will be productive if we all share and support Okonjo Iweala’s vision to make Nigeria a better place to live.
With the majority supports she enjoys from Nigerians, all Okonjo-Iweala requires is to be focused and bring her wealth of experience to bear on the lofty goals she has set for herself.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
