Opinion
Let’s Go Back To Agriculture
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), while profiling the human development status of Nigeria in its 2000/2001 report, drew the attention of the nation to its diminished performance in agricultural production. The agency revealed that 70 out of every 120 Nigerians are very poor, indicating that they lack “access to the resources needed for a decent standard of living” as well as the capabilities “to live a long and healthy life”.
Alongside that grim statistics was another that Nigeria’s contribution to global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was “rather infinitestesimal – 0.22 per cent”.
For instance, the country’s share in the world commodities market in respect of its main export produce has gradually plummeted downwards. Cocoa which contributed about 82 per cent to the GDP in the 60s went down to 59 per cent in the 90s, coffee went down from 20 per cent to 13 per cent, palm oil from 60 per cent to 1.5 per cent, palm kernel from 93 per cent to 17 per cent and groundnuts from 61 per cent to 33 per cent. The situation today is even worse. By the reckoning of the UNDP, premature exposure to trade liberalization in the 1980s was a key factor to their decline.
There is no doubt that the discovery of crude oil is and remains the nemesis of the agriculture sub-sector. The country’s complacency and recklessness, as in the unconscious embrace of trade liberalisation during the ill-directed Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) of the Ibrahim Babagida’s era, which was fuelled by the dollar-spinning potential of the new export commodity was Nigeria’s economic nemesis in the 1990s.
This attention-shift from agriculture to oil has continued to manifest itself till today. The result can be clearly seen in the paltry allocation to agriculture in the yearly budgets; the non-availability of subsidies to farmers, limited credit facilities, import duties on vital agricultural equipment, and high rate of fertilizer and the abolition of commodity marketing boards, among others. In effect, the nation’s export profile has continued to shrink, while at the same time, the food situation in the country gets more precarious with each giving day.
In fact, recent reports indicate that major indigenous cocoa exporters, palm oil farmers, coffee producers, cassava and yam farmers and fishermen have abandoned the trades for politics, while others have converted their facilities into ware-houses for imported goods.
The authorities of the various tiers of government are not unaware of the problems confronting the agriculture sub-sector and the imperative of decisive actions. Of course, the Appropriation Acts, at least, have acknowledged the need to diversify the nation’s revenue base through efficient exploitation of its agricultural potentials, even though the allocations to that effect betray a lack of commitment.
Perhaps, the Federal Government’s recent imposition of a 2.3 per cent duty on agrochemical inputs and its continued inability to fund vital institutions like the Nigerian Store Products Research Institute (NSPRI) and the Nigerian Institute for Agricultural Research (NIFAR) gives the same impression that a definitive policy thrust to make Nigeria’s agriculture bounce back is lacking.
This half-heartedness by successive governments clearly demonstrates Nigeria’s total dependence on crude oil production to the detriment of a vital sector like agriculture. This has resulted in poor standard of living, especially in the Niger Delta region.
It is against this backdrop that I want to urge the Federal Government to unfold available blueprints for sustainable agricultural development and mobilise all resources at its disposal for the tasks ahead.
The 14-point policy proposal submitted by the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commence, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NACCIMA) to the National Assembly, should be considered for implementation. Through reasonable collaboration, government and the organised private sector could lift the nation from the present economic distress and ensure the realisation of the Vision 2020.
Meanwhile, I want to commend Rivers State Governor, Chibuike Amaechi for his lofty ideas and support in boosting rural agricultural production in the state. His vision and mission to revitalise the Rivers State Agricultural Development Programme in Rumuodomaya is a welcome development. We only hope the governor will not renege on his promise to make Rivers State the basket food of the nation.
Agomuo, a public analyst resides in Port Harcourt.
Godspower Ibe Agomuo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
