Opinion
Blood Is Thicker Than Water
It was home, sweet home, for President Goodluck Jonathan as a tumultuous crowd of his own brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, friends, in-laws, and other people from within and outside the Niger Delta region received him at the Port Harcourt International Airport, Omagwa by 10.27 a.m on Friday May 14, 2010 for a two-day official visit to Rivers State. As he disembarked from his aircraft radiant with happiness, a smile as bright as the sunshine in heaven beamed over his face. And as he waved his two hands acknowledging cheers from the jubilant crowd, the entire airport became more animated with singing and dancing.
As early as 8.00 a.m that day, the airport premises and the surroundings had been jam parked with cars, and buses that ferried persons and groups from the length and breadth of the Niger Delta region. Individuals, cultural troupes, clubs, association, and school children also lined up the roads and streets waiting to catch a glimpse of this eminent son of theirs to whom divine providence has bestowed the challenging responsibility of piloting the affairs of this great nation.
The Governor of Rivers State, Rt Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi who led his counterparts and other top government officials from the South-South and South-East geopolitical zones of the country to welcome this distinguished son of the Niger Delta, was bubbling overtly with joy.
Rivers State is a hospitable place, known for outstanding and colourful reception for its guests especially such august visitors as the President of the country and other senior government functionaries. But since its inception 43 years ago, the state has never held a reception as grandiose as the last one for any president/head of state of this country. Strictly speaking, the reception for President Jonathan during the two two-day working visit to the state, was unprecedented. Its memories will remain indelible on the minds of the people of Rivers State and others who witnessed the historic event.
Yes, Dr Jonathan hails from Otuoke in Ogbia Kingdom of Ogbia Local Government Areas of Bayelsa State where he had his primary school education. And, he attended Mater Dei High School also in Bayelsa State. But he had his university education and other life experiences preparatory to his present calling in Port Harcourt, Rivers State. And to cap it all, he found his soul mate, his beloved wife, Patience, in Rivers State. So it was not surprising that Rivers people accorded him a most rousing welcome.
Dr Jonathan is a unique breed who has combined in him the virtues of the two states, Bayelsa and Rivers; the virtues of love, humility, detachment, contentment, devotion to duty calmness of mind and body, and spirit of selfless service to man and God.
But above all, Dr Jonathan represents the Niger Delta region. A region that is both rich and poor; whose poverty is the fallout of its endowment and wealth.
In October, 2007, the Sixth Senate of the nation rose from its comfort zone for a five-day retreat in the overwhelmed, degraded Niger Delta region. The senators toured the region as anxious observers and reported that the economic and environmental difficulties faced by the various communities were lamentable. But nothing concrete came out of the retreat to benefit the people.
Thereafter, several efforts including the setting up of the Ibrahim Gambari Steering Committee that did not see the light of the day, the Technical Committee headed by Mr Ledum Mittee, and the Niger Delta Ministry have been made to resolve the region’s dilemma but to no avail.
These efforts only succeeded in merely raising the hopes of the Niger Delta people just like the Willinks Commission of Enquiry (1957), Niger Delta Development Board (NDDB) (1961), Niger Delta Basin Development Authority (NDBDA) (1976), the Oil Mineral Producing Areas Development Commission (OMPADEC) (1992), and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) (2000).
The celebration that greeted the visit of Dr Jonathan to Rivers State therefore anchored primary on the fact that within the fifty years Nigeria has existed as an independent nation, this is the very first time the Niger Delta region, the engine of growth for the country’s development, is having its own; its own blood; its own son, as the President of the nation. The people therefore came out in their numbers with love in their hearts to welcome the one and only one who they now believe can sincerely address the developmental crisis of the region.
The Niger Delta situation still remains agonizing. Because even with the long years of commissions, boards, agencies, technical committees, special ministry, and now amnesty programme, the situation has not changed. The level of environmental devastation in the region is much worse now than ever before. The local economy has been terribly destroyed, fishing and farming, the economic mainstay of the people, are no longer productive ventures. And the problems of inadequate housing, high and rising levels of unemployment and under-employment, bad roads, bad water, bad air, and poor health arising from the mindless oil exploration and exploitation activities in the region continue to increase in an alarming rate.
It is part of man’s nature to search endlessly for solutions to his problems. But the solution to the Niger Delta quagmire is not beyond our nose. It is believed that one of the major desires and needs of the Niger Delta region is that the oil bearing communities be made part owners in the exploitation of their God-given resources.
This may help to bring about the required change in the Niger Delta region and raise the people above their present state of hoping against hope.
It will be self-deceit on the part of the leaders of the Nigerian State to think that oil will continually flow in the Niger Delta endlessly. Crude oil is not like fuel wood, wind, tidal, solar, biomas, and geothermal which are renewable energy sources, meaning that sooner or later, it will be exhausted.
The people of Niger Delta are therefore looking up to their own son, President Jonathan to boldly tackle the endemic problems of the region once and for all.
Vincent Ochonma
Opinion
A Renewing Optimism For Naira
Opinion
Don’t Kill Tam David-West
Opinion
Fuel Subsidy Removal and the Economic Implications for Nigerians
From all indications, Nigeria possesses enough human and material resources to become a true economic powerhouse in Africa. According to the National Population Commission (NPC, 2023), the country’s population has grown steadily within the last decade, presently standing at about 220 million people—mostly young, vibrant, and innovative. Nigeria also remains the sixth-largest oil producer in the world, with enormous reserves of gas, fertile agricultural land, and human capital.
Yet, despite this enormous potential, the country continues to grapple with underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS, 2023) show that about 129 million Nigerians currently live below the poverty line. Most families can no longer afford basic necessities, even as the government continues to project a rosy economic picture.
The Subsidy Question
The removal of fuel subsidy in 2023 by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been one of the most controversial policy decisions in Nigeria’s recent history. According to the president, subsidy removal was designed to reduce fiscal burden, unify the foreign exchange rate, attract investment, curb inflation, and discourage excessive government borrowing.
While these objectives are theoretically sound, the reality for ordinary Nigerians has been severe hardship. Fuel prices more than tripled, transportation costs surged, and food inflation—already high—rose above 30% (NBS, 2023). The World Bank (2023) estimates that an additional 7.1 million Nigerians were pushed into poverty after subsidy removal.
A Critical Economic View
As an economist, I argue that the problem was not subsidy removal itself—which was inevitable—but the timing, sequencing, and structural gaps in Nigeria’s implementation.
- Structural Miscalculation
Nigeria’s four state-owned refineries remain nonfunctional. By removing subsidies without local refining capacity, the government exposed the economy to import-price pass-through effects—where global oil price shocks translate directly into domestic inflation. This was not just a timing issue but a fundamental policy miscalculation.
- Neglect of Social Safety Nets
Countries like Indonesia (2005) and Ghana (2005) removed subsidies successfully only after introducing cash transfers, transport vouchers, and food subsidies for the poor (World Bank, 2005). Nigeria, however, implemented removal abruptly, shifting the fiscal burden directly onto households without protection.
- Failure to Secure Food and Energy Alternatives
Fuel subsidy removal amplified existing weaknesses in agriculture and energy. Instead of sequencing reforms, government left Nigerians without refinery capacity, renewable energy alternatives, or mechanized agricultural productivity—all of which could have cushioned the shock.
Political and Public Concerns
Prominent leaders have echoed these concerns. Mr. Peter Obi, the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, described the subsidy removal as “good but wrongly timed.” Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party also faulted the government’s hasty approach. Human rights activists like Obodoekwe Stive stressed that refineries should have been made functional first, to reduce the suffering of citizens.
This is not just political rhetoric—it reflects a widespread economic reality. When inflation climbs above 30%, when purchasing power collapses, and when households cannot meet basic needs, the promise of reform becomes overshadowed by social pain.
Broader Implications
The consequences of this policy are multidimensional:
- Inflationary Pressures – Food inflation above 30% has made nutrition unaffordable for many households.
- Rising Poverty – 7.1 million Nigerians have been newly pushed into poverty (World Bank, 2023).
- Middle-Class Erosion – Rising transport, rent, and healthcare costs are squeezing household incomes.
- Debt Concerns – Despite promises, government borrowing has continued, raising sustainability questions.
- Public Distrust – When government promises savings but citizens feel only pain, trust in leadership erodes.
In effect, subsidy removal without structural readiness has widened inequality and eroded social stability.
Missed Opportunities
Nigeria’s leaders had the chance to approach subsidy removal differently:
- Refinery Rehabilitation – Ensuring local refining to reduce exposure to global oil price shocks.
- Renewable Energy Investment – Diversifying energy through solar, hydro, and wind to reduce reliance on imported petroleum.
- Agricultural Productivity – Mechanization, irrigation, and smallholder financing could have boosted food supply and stabilized prices.
- Social Safety Nets – Conditional cash transfers, food vouchers, and transport subsidies could have protected the most vulnerable.
Instead, reform came abruptly, leaving citizens to absorb all the pain while waiting for theoretical long-term benefits.
Conclusion: Reform With a Human Face
Fuel subsidy removal was inevitable, but Nigeria’s approach has worsened hardship for millions. True reform must go beyond fiscal savings to protect citizens.
Economic policy is not judged only by its efficiency but by its humanity. A well-sequenced reform could have balanced fiscal responsibility with equity, ensuring that ordinary Nigerians were not crushed under the weight of sudden change.
Nigeria has the resources, population, and resilience to lead Africa’s economy. But leadership requires foresight. It requires policies that are inclusive, humane, and strategically sequenced.
Reform without equity is displacement of poverty, not development. If Nigeria truly seeks progress, its policies must wear a human face.
References
- National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Poverty and Inequality Report. Abuja.
- National Population Commission (NPC). (2023). Population Estimates. Abuja.
- World Bank. (2023). Nigeria Development Update. Washington, DC.
- World Bank. (2005). Fuel Subsidy Reforms: Lessons from Indonesia and Ghana. Washington, DC.
- OPEC. (2023). Annual Statistical Bulletin. Vienna.
By: Amarachi Amaugo
-
Oil & Energy24 hours agoOil Theft: Economic Council Urges NNPC To Strengthen Security In Creeks
-
News23 hours agoAir Peace Begins Direct Flight From Abuja To London
-
Business24 hours agoNigeria Exits FATF Grey List For Global Financial Crime ………..NFIU
-
Nation20 hours agoOgoni Cleanup Programme, Enabling Pathways To Development Of Ogoni – Zabbey
-
Niger Delta4 days agoOando Recommits To Education …Assures Continuous Partnership With RSU
-
Sports24 hours agoFBN, C’River gov partner to boost tourism
-
Oil & Energy24 hours agoFG Pledges Solar Power Hospitals, Varsities
-
News23 hours agoNigeria Records $50bn Cryptocurrency Transactions In One Year
