Opinion
ASUU, FG: Who Is Fooling Who?
Emmanuel Ikpegbu
“The moment we begin to fear the opinions of others and hesitate to tell the truth that is in us, and motives of policy are silent when we should speak, the divine floods of light and life no longer flow into our souls,” so said Elizabeth C. Stanton.
For some weeks now, University students have been at home without lectures owing to a disagreement between the government and the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) over salary structure, university autonomy etc.
An inquisitive mind will always ask the unanswered question, who is fooling who? Are the parties in the crisis sincere in their arguments and claims? It is when our leaders try to answer this question that peace will return to our citadels of learning.
ASUU, a labour union of lecturers, organised its first strike action in 1992. The body was led then by Prof Esko Toyo, Prof Okonjo (the father of former Minister of Finance) and late Dr Ala Oni. The union says it can no longer fold her arms while our institutions of learning become shadows of their oldself.
During the 16 years of military dictatorship from 1983-1999, a chain of austerity programmes were in place. Education was relegated to the background.
Scholars like Omafume Onoge, Dipo Fashina, Asisi Asobie, Edwin Madunagu, Ade Ajayi, Toye Olorode, Biodun Jeyifo, Atahiru Jega, Idowu Awopetu, Mahmud Tukur, and Claude Ake, to mention but a few, made giant strides to save the system.
Sadly enough, during the period under review, corruption, profligacy and fiscal impropriety became the order of the day. Men could forge date of birth just to overstay in the civil service, add figures, short-change clients to claim public properties and literally buy degree certificates from the universities.
The painful part of the whole anormally was that the government was inconsiderate of the future of the nation. For instance, allocation to the education sector remained under 10 per cent of the countries budget leading to brain drain. As part of the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), naira was devalued and public expenditures were arbitrarily cut down.
The country became so unconducive for education to thrive. While structures were dilapidating and tools wearing out, university workers watched helplessly.
One of Nigeria’s most sought-after scientists in 1999 and the hero of the computer, Philip Emegwali, captured the situation when he said.
“Devaluation restricted the amount of equipment and books that could be purchased. A University Professor that was earning $1,000 a month in 1980 now earns $50 a month and most were forced to emigrate.”
The government at that time saw education as a wasteful venture t hat could be waved aside. May be because they were not educated enough to know and understand the priceless value of education.
When the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund) forced Nigeria to reduce public expenditures, Gen. Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida cut the education budget instead of the military budget.
At that time, both teachers and lecturers almost worked for free. The usual saying was that their reward is in heaven. Stock of unpaid salaries piled up whereas hundreds of millions of dollars, not even naira, were expended to import arms.
The sector fell into comma needing a revolutionary change to restore life back to it. Education and Health budgets in 1996 taken together, were less than the defence budgets.
A whooping N15billion was spent to maintain an 80,000-man army (while) less than 15 billion was spent to educate 60 million Nigerian school children.”
It is even more thought provoking to note that public expenditure on education was approximately 0.7 per cent in 1997. This included subsidies to the entire three-tiers of education. Primary, secondary and tertiary education got only seven per cent from the 2001 budget.
The immediate past administration of Olusegun Obasanjo spent over 80 per cent of the budget to run her incompetent bureaucracy.
The snag was not lack of fund in the country’s revenue, rather, the government was not ready to include education in its priority list. For instance, the Abuja National Stadium gulped a whooping $700 million at its completion whereas the budget on both education and health were far below that.
Unfortunately, there are fewer universities than the nation’s population. There are only 92 schools recognised by the NUC and how can these handful of varsities cater for the millions of students who seek admission yearly. No doubt, this has given rise to the everyday over-crowding nature of our schools.
Here and there, abandoned projects spread all over the campuses as the existing ones were left unattended to.
Ikpegbu wrote in from Imo State University, Owerri.
To be continued next week
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers4 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News4 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News4 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics4 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics4 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
