Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Big Oil Firms Now Ready To Boost Spending

Published

on

All five oil and gas supermajors are looking to boost capital spending in 2022.
Despite some of the big oil timesreporting strongest earnings in years and record cash flows, capital discipline remains a key pillar of Exxon, Chevron, Shell, BP, and TotalEnergies are set to increase their combined capex programs in 2022 by at least $12 billion.
All five international oil and gas majors expect to boost their capital spending next year, although capital discipline and higher returns to shareholders will remain the top priorities for ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP, and TotalEnergies. 
Those oil majors—although Shell, BP, and TotalEnergies now prefer to be known as energy companies—have reported strong cash flows and earnings for the past two quarters as significantly higher oil and gas prices compared to last year boosted profits.  
Despite some of Big Oil reporting strongest earnings in years and record cash flows, capital discipline remains a key pillar of all future strategies. Increased capex plans for 2022 and onwards are not surprising considering the fact that in 2020, all firms slashed as early as in March their capital allocation guidance in response to the crash in prices in the pandemic. Now budgets are slightly higher than in 2021 and incremental investments are specifically going to core growth oil and gas projects with low breakevens and high returns and to low-carbon energy. 
Discipline Continues To Guide Spending 
Despite $80 oil, no one is splurging on investment these days, unlike in the years prior to the 2015 price crash, when companies were spending as if oil would stay at $100 a barrel forever.  
Sure, capex for 2022 is higher at all five majors compared to 2021 and 2020, but it’s nowhere near 2014 levels. Capital discipline is still the keyword in all earnings releases and calls, where higher dividends and share buybacks take precedence when it comes to allocating this year’s record cash flows. 
Exxon, Chevron, Shell, BP, and TotalEnergies are set to increase their combined capex programs in 2022 by at least $12 billion, according to estimates from Energy Intelligence based on company reports and earnings calls.  The increases are much smaller than the surge in the cash flow and earnings this year as the majors are set to primarily use the windfall to reduce debt and increase shareholder returns by raising dividends and repurchasing stock. 
Higher Low-Carbon Spending 
The five largest international firms are also raising capital spending on low-carbon energy, including the U.S. supermajors who differ from their European competitors in strategy by not being willing to invest in any solar and wind power generation. Instead, Exxon and Chevron plan to focus on renewable fuels and carbon capture and storage (CCS), both to cut their own carbon footprint and to develop in partnership regional CCS hubs in heavily industrialized areas.
Chevron, for example, said in September that it would triple its planned capital investment in lower carbon businesses to $10 billion through 2028, including $2 billion to lower the carbon intensity of its operations. Exxon said last week it expects its cumulative low-carbon investments to be around $15 billion from 2022 through 2027, a fourfold increase in a plan to raise total capex by at least $4 billion in 2022 compared to 2021. 
Exxon Plans Highest Capex Hike 
In reporting blockbuster earnings for Q3 last week, ExxonMobil’s said its 2021 capital program is expected to be near the low end of the $16 billion to $19 billion range. In the fourth quarter, the board of directors will formally approve the corporate plan, with capital spending anticipated to be in the range of $20 billion to $25 billion annually. The higher investment is underpinned by further appraisals and developments in Guyana and Brazil, Kathy Mikells, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, said on the Q3 earnings call last week. The Permian remains a top priority as well, where “we’re seeing that work that we’re doing out in the Permian deliver the same value for a lot less spend,” CEO Darren Woods said. 
The other majors also plan higher capex in coming years, although less than Exxon’s increase in spending.
Shell, for example, said in its strategy day in February that it would boost its cash capex to $23 billion-$27 billion per year, from $19-22 billion annually, when it brings net debt down to below $65 billion. The company did that in Q3, with net debt down by $8.2 billion to $57.5 billion, thanks to improved macroeconomic environment and commodity derivatives inflows. 
Shell’s higher capex was contingent on reducing debt and increasing shareholder returns first. 
TotalEnergies, which sees net investments in 2021 at $13 billion—including $3 billion on renewables and electricity—expects to keep investment discipline, with its capex program at $13-15 billion per year for 2022-2025, the French firm said in September in its strategy presentation.  
Chevron, which lowered 2021 capex guidance to $12 billion-$13 billion, has guidance of $15 billion to $17 billion for 2022 through 2025, CFO Pierre Breber said on the Q3 earnings call on Friday after Chevron reported its biggest quarterly profit since 2013 and its highest free cash flow on record. 
“We do expect higher capex in the fourth quarter and next year,” Breber said. 
Despite higher spending guidance, Big Oil continues to be conservative in capital allocation now that shareholders want returns and ESG investors want accountability. 
“US$80/bbl oil gives companies options, and a chance to do it all – return cash to shareholders, maintain oil and gas investment, and accelerate investment in low carbon opportunities. The current upcycle presents a golden opportunity to reposition for a very different future,” Kavita Jadhav, research director at Wood Mackenzie, said last month. 
Paraskova Reports for Oilprice.com

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

NERC, OYSERC  Partner To Strengthen Regulation

Published

on

THE Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has stressed the need for strict adherence to due process in operationalizing state electricity regulatory bodies.
It, however, pledged institutional and technical support to the Oyo State Electricity Regulatory Commission (OYSERC).
The Chairman, NERC, Dr Musiliu Oseni, who made the position known while receiving the OYSERC delegation, emphasised that the establishment and take-off of state commissions must align fully with the law setting them up.
Oseni said that the NERC remains committed to partnering with State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERC) to guarantee their institutional stability, operational effectiveness and long-term success.
He insisted that regulatory coordination between federal and state institutions is critical in the evolving electricity market framework, noting that collaboration would help to build strong institutions capable of delivering sustainable outcomes for the sector.
Also speaking, the Acting Chairman, OYSERC and leader of the delegation, Prof. Dahud Kehinde Shangodoyin, said that the visit was aimed at formally introducing the commission’s acting leadership to the NERC and laying the groundwork for a productive working relationship.
Shangodoyin said , the acting members were appointed to provide direction and lay a solid foundation for the commission during its transitional period, pending the appointment of substantive members.
“We are here to formally introduce the acting leadership of OYSERC and to establish a working relationship with NERC as we commence our regulatory responsibilities,” he said.
He acknowledged NERC’s readiness to provide technical and regulatory support, particularly in the area of capacity development, describing the backing as essential for strengthening the commission’s operations at this formative stage.
“We appreciate NERC’s willingness to support us technically and regulatorily, especially in building our capacity during this transition,” he added.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

NLC Faults FG’s 3trn Dept Payment To GenCos

Published

on

The Nigeria Labour Congress and the Association of Power Generation Companies have engaged in a showdown over federal government legacy debt.
NLC president Joe Ajaero has faulted the federal government’s move to give GenCos N3 trillion from the Federation account as repayment for a power sector legacy debt, which amounts to N6.5 trillion.
In a statement on Thursday, Ajaero said the Federal Government proposed the N3 trillion payment and the N6 trillion debt as a heist and grand deception to shortchange the Nigerian people.
“Nigerians cannot and should not continue to pay for darkness,” Ajaero stated.
Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Association of Power Generation Companies, APGC, Dr. Joy Ogaji, said Ajaero may be ignorant of the true state of things, insisting that the federal government is indebted to GenCos to the tune of N6.5 trillion.
She feared the longstanding conflict could result in the eventual collapse of the country’s power.
According to her, the federal government’s N501 billion issuance of power sector bonds is inadequate to address its accumulated debt.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

PENGASSAN Rejects Presidential EO On Oil, Gas Revenue Remittance  ……… Seeks PIA Review 

Published

on

The Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria(PENGASSAN) Festus Osifo, has faulted the public explanation surrounding the Federal Government’s recent oil revenue Executive Order(EO).
President of the association, Festus Osifo, argued that claims about a 30 per cent deduction from petroleum sharing contract revenue are misleading.
Recall that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, last Wednesday, February 18, signed the executive order directing that royalty oil, tax oil, profit oil, profit gas, and other revenues due to the Federation under production sharing, profit sharing, and risk service contracts be paid directly into the Federation Account.
The order also scrapped the 30 per cent Frontier Exploration Fund under the PIA and stopped the 30 per cent management fee on profit oil and profit gas retained by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.
In his reaction, Osifo, while addressing journalists, in Lagos, Thursday, said the figure being referenced does not represent gross revenue accruing to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.
He explained that revenues from production sharing contracts are subject to several deductions before arriving at what is classified as profit oil or profit gas.
Osifo also urged President Bola Tinubu to withdraw his recently signed Presidential Executive Order to Safeguard Federation Oil and Gas Revenues and Provide Regulatory Clarity, 2026.
He warned that the directive undermines the Petroleum Industry Act and could create uncertainty in the oil and gas industry, insisting that any amendment to the existing legal framework must pass through the National Assembly.
Osifo argued that an executive order cannot override a law enacted by the National Assembly, describing the move as setting a troubling precedent.
“Yes, that is what should be done from the beginning. You can review the laws of a land. There is no law that is perfect,” he said.
He added that the President should constitute a team to review the PIA, identify its strengths and weaknesses, and forward proposed amendments to lawmakers.
“When you get revenue from PSC, you have to make some deductibles. You deduct royalties. You deduct tax. You also deduct the cost of cost recovery. Once you have done that, you will now have what we call profit oil or profit gas. Then that is where you now deduct the 30 per cent,” he stated..
According to him, when the deductions are properly accounted for, the 30 per cent being referenced translates to about two per cent of total revenue from the production sharing contracts.
“In effect, that deduction is about two per cent of the revenue of the PLCs,” he added, maintaining that the explanation presented in the public domain did not accurately reflect the structure of the deductions.
Osifo warned that removing the affected portion of the revenue could have operational implications for NNPC Ltd, noting that the funds are used to meet salary obligations and other internal expenses.
“That two per cent is what NNPC uses to pay salaries and meet some of its obligations.The one you are also removing from the midstream and downstream, it is part of what they use in meeting their internal obligations. So as you are removing this, how are they going to pay salaries?” he queried.
Beyond the immediate impact on the company’s workforce, he cautioned that regulatory uncertainty could affect investor confidence in the sector.
“If the international community and investors lose confidence in Nigeria, it has a way of affecting investment. That should be the direction. You don’t put a cow before the horse,” he added.
According to him, stakeholders, including labour unions and industry operators, should be given the opportunity to make inputs at the National Assembly as part of the amendment process saying “That is how laws are refined,”
Continue Reading

Trending