Opinion
Endangered National Patrimony
Before he became a civilian president of Nigeria, retired General, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, spoke on a BBC programme, saying: “We are spending money like a drunken sailor. We are spending much more money than we are earning. Where does all the money go?”
Before then, late Chief Obafemi Awolowo had also warned, during Alhaji Shehu Shagari’s Presidency, that the Nigerian currency, the naira, was degenerating to the status of tissue paper. In the typical Nigerian manner of prevarication and equivocation, these warnings were dismissed as the rantings of dooms-day prophets.
Interestingly, one of the dooms-day prophets of the past became a President, with one of the tasks of making the “drunken sailor” sober and less profligate. Rather, the old “Prophet” referred to Nigerians who raised similar alarm calls and warnings about profligate spending, as “dooms-day prophets.” At that time, some one asked if there is any strange thing which makes critics of government become different when they get to power!
The situation of Nigeria then was not quite different from what it is now, rather, the groaning of the masses has become more widespread and disturbing. As things are now only those Nigerians who had piled up enough booties and private stock from the national patrimony in readiness for the dooms-day, live in ignorance that the national patrimony is now in jeopardy.
The national patrimony, derived from and largely dependent on mineral oil, has been placed in jeopardy arising from activities of clever Nigerians, who, like Obasanjo’s drunken sailor, have been “spending much more money than we are earning”. Consequences of such profligacy and non-accountability are now with us, and Nigerians should be asking: who are the drunken sailors and their accomplices? We may never know who they are, or the clever ways they operate, but surely, the nation has bled enough and the masses groaned enough. Would the “drunken sailor” not stop drinking and would the bar-tender not stop giving him more booz?
It was longer than we can tell, that the nation’s economy began to slide towards greater danger and into deeper waters. The danger signals came not only from Chief Olusegun Obasanjo and late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, but several people had also warned that the country was sliding into danger and agony.
The oil and gas sector as the life-line of the Nigerian economy is not in a stable state. Oil business world-wide is known to be “oily affair” not only because of its capital-intensive nature, but also because it is a political lubricant. All intrigues and bamboozlement play out in that sector and those who poke-nose therein, get their nose, fingers or the entire body burnt.
Why is Nigeria, an oil-producing nation, with six refineries, importing fuel and why are the refineries not functioning at full capacity, in spite of huge sums of money sunk into maintenance in the past many years? Why does privatization become a solution to management failure? Why would the cost of production of oil not be high, when large numbers of soldiers, police and other security personnel are deployed to guard the facilities, from off-shore and on-shore drilling sites, to refineries? This does not include personal escorts assigned to personnel of oil companies by the Inspector-General of Police.
Many years ago Professor Tam David-West stressed that “the magic word of privatization can only yield meaningful dividends for the general good if we have a responsible government in place … what we should be addressing is first and foremost, good governance, and consequently all the other set economic goods will fall in place, even without privatization”.
Reasons for the pathetic state of the nation’s economy are not far-fetched. We cannot deny the fact that the proverbial “drunken sailor” is the government itself. Those who can afford to drink and get drunk are usually those who are affluent and merry, or those who resort to it because of frustration.
The mess and fraud we find everywhere can be traced to an insatiable appetite to amass wealth regardless of what happens to the country and its future and image. Not every rodent can have an access to where the proverbial national cake is being baked or shared. Those who are excluded from such access scrounge through similarly fraudulent and corrupt means, to have some food in their stomach and roof over their heads. Let us join Chief Olusegun Obasanjo to ask:
Where does all the money go?” What an unlucky scapegoat Deziani must be!
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer from Rivers State University.
e-mail:bamirize@yahoo.com.
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers5 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education5 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta5 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education5 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News5 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Rivers23 hours ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News23 hours agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
News5 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
