Connect with us

Opinion

The Many Faces Of Corruption

Published

on

That corruption is pervasive in Nigeria is no longer news. The menace has almost become a pastime, a daily routine in the country. Although the menace is as old as the country itself, the rate of its prevalence is such alarming that if we do not do something to kill corruption in Nigeria, corruption will kill us.
But how do we come about this menace of corruption? What constitutes and what propels corruption? These are two of the questions I want to address in this piece, with a view to getting to the root cause of corruption in our country.
My first answer is over prioritization of money.
Money has been unduly prioritized in Nigeria. Money is worshiped like a god, people no longer worry about the source through which money is made, the only thing that matters is that money has been made. This is why an individual can vanish from his community in poverty only to re-appear in affluence to the exhilarations of his people who will never pause to ask questions on how the individual met sudden wealth. Rather, the individual will be bathed with different kinds of chieftaincy accolades like Eze Omemma 1. Onwanetiriora 1, Omego 1etc. The feeling that money is everything does not help matters either. Before now, there were people who commanded great respect in our societies even when they were not wealthy but because of their vocation or great initiatives.
The absence or non-implementation of strong punishments against those found guilty of corrupt practices also constitutes a huge motivation for intending ones. The cases of Abacha, Tafa Balogun and Patricia Etteh are good examples. A situation where someone has been found guilty of stealing the country’s funds and the same person remains as free as any other man is absurd. Why will others who have access to public funds not try their own luck? This is why we are going nowhere in the anti-corruption crusade.
Another factor is poor remuneration. When people are not adequately rewarded, when they cannot meet up with basic family demands, the option becomes a search for additional income through unwholesome strategies. This is what makes a man ask for tips before files can move, or before gate can be opened. It is very important for employers to pay realistic wage that can really take workers home.
Also, the ways and manners retirees are treated in this country is devoid of respect and regards for their contributions while in service. Their pensions are left unpaid or months or years. When eventually paid, they will be made to travel through miles and possibly spend a reasonable part of the money on transit. When those who are still in active service see what their colleagues go through, they are compelled to make hay while the sun shines. The victim of this haymaking becomes public funds.
Another burning condition that has ignited corruption in Nigeria is the ways recruitments are made. There are over emphasis on the impossibles; a typical recruitment advert in Nigeria will read as follows – our organization is in search of young, vibrant, intelligent and energetic graduate to fill our vacant position. The person must not be more than 20 years of age, must have a minimum of 5 years post NYSC cognate experience and he/she must e a member of at least two professional bodies.  Now come to think of it, considering the Nigerian factors, how is it possible that anyone can truly meet these conditions? The alternative becomes forgery and falsifications; this practice is then continued in other spheres of the individual’s life.
Therefore we need to be realistic in giving conditions because we do not have many Nigerians yet who graduate from higher education at any age less than 20 years. All these are serious factors that stare the Nigerian job seekers on the face, and those who may not wish to falsify document are no job candidates anywhere. So, what should they do to survive in the absence of no job, no capital for business?
In any case, the existence of these conditions as presented does not mean that corruption should be left to prosper in the land unchecked. There is need to fight corruption to a standstill if our country must move forward. But I think one way of checking corruption is by institutionalizing whistle blowing. This action is sine qua non if the anti-corruption war must be won. The problem facing whistle blowing pose challenges in the field of law, sociology and ethics. A multidisciplinary approach would therefore be necessary for whistle blowing to be successfully institutionalized.
According to Rothschild and Miethe (1994), whistle blowing is the disclosure of illegal, unethical, or harmful practices in the workplace to parties who might take action; and this disclosure must be at public interest.
Klopper (1997), threw more light that these would entail information about criminal activities, a contravention of any statutory requirement, improper or unauthorized use of public and other funds, miscarriage of justice, abuse of power, maladministration, danger to health or safety of any individual and any other misbehaviour or malpractice.
National reorientation is yet a step that should be urgently introduced; this will serve as a proactive measure as against reactive. Nigerians have for long been living on what some people called the survival of the fittest – and – grab – whatever – comes – your – way – mentality. It is only when our values are corrected and behaviours modified that corruption can witness a good fight.
The kids-glove treatment meted out to corrupt Nigerians by the government and its law enforcement agencies constitutes a big motivation for others who contemplate being corrupted. This kind of treatment should as a matter of urgency be substituted by stronger punitive rewards to serve as deterrent for others. If corrupt people are treated like the armed robbers, at least most people will avoid it. However, this can only be possible in an environment where the rule of law is supreme, where checks and balance is a tradition, and separation of power is sincerely embraced.
It is also very important that anti-corruption agencies are not tied to the individuals that head them. Nigerians have penchant for hooking up the good or bad of government agencies on the leaders of such agencies; EFCC was like Ribadu’s private thing even when he was only discharging his statutory duties; the risks and benefits were made to look like his, and we made it look like there was no EFCC without Ribadu.
It is really high time we separated key players of government agencies from their positions because doing otherwise was a major factor that diminished the efforts of the EFCC under Ribadu as those prosecuted or chased about considered him their enemies and not the agency itself.
Finally, all the accounting bodies in the country like ICAN< ACA, ACPA etc should be granted a forum to brainstorm and find solution to the ease with which money is stolen through signature. It is only when we have better accounting standards; stricter auditing that stealing of public and private funds can be minimized.
Corruption, no doubt has caused colossal damage to this country; damage ranging from negative image globally to other internal ones like loss of money, eroding the values of honesty, integrity, hard work and law abiding which are hitherto perceived as traits of the slow, feeble minded, timid and unachievers. Corruption has created monsters in the form of wealthy people who contributed or contributes nothing to national development and national economy. In any case, Nigeria still has the chance of coming out of this mess. This calls for concerted involvement of all in the President Muhammadu Buhari, anti-corruption crusade.
If only all of us realizes the fact that every Nigerian has a right to live, a right to drink water, a right to use electricity, a right to accessible road network, then no one will wish to embezzle the money that is meant for all.
Orukwonwu is …………………..

 

Justin Orukwonwu

Continue Reading

Opinion

Curbing Youth Unemployment In Nigeria

Published

on

Quote: “A nation that fails to empower its youth risks mortgaging its future.”
Youth, generally defined as individuals between the ages of 15 and 35, represent a critical phase of human development—a transition from adolescence to adulthood marked by ambition, energy, and the pursuit of purpose. In Nigeria, this demographic constitutes a significant proportion of the population, making it one of the country’s greatest assets. However, this strength is increasingly undermined by a persistent and troubling challenge: youth unemployment.
Unemployment, the condition of being without gainful employment despite the willingness and ability to work, remains a major global concern. In Nigeria, however, it has reached alarming levels, particularly among young people. With estimates suggesting that a substantial percentage of Nigerian youth are either unemployed or underemployed, the consequences have become deeply embedded in the nation’s social and economic fabric.
The impact of youth unemployment is both widespread and severe. Economically, it leads to increased poverty levels and reduced productivity. Socially, it fuels frustration, hopelessness, and disillusionment among young people. This often manifests in rising rates of crime, cyber fraud, substance abuse, and involvement in political violence. When young people are unable to find legitimate means of livelihood, they may become vulnerable to negative influences, posing a threat not only to themselves but to society at large.
One of the primary drivers of youth unemployment in Nigeria is the inadequacy of the educational system. While many young Nigerians graduate from tertiary institutions each year, a significant number lack the practical and technical skills required in today’s job market. The disconnect between academic curricula and industry demands leaves graduates ill-prepared for employment, thereby widening the gap between education and employability.
Furthermore, Nigeria’s heavy dependence on the oil sector has contributed significantly to the unemployment crisis. Over the years, this reliance has led to the neglect of other critical sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and technology—sectors that have the potential to generate large-scale employment. The failure to diversify the economy has limited job opportunities and stifled innovation, leaving many young people without viable career paths.
In addition, rapid population growth continues to put immense pressure on the labor market. Each year, thousands of graduates enter the workforce, but the number of available jobs remains insufficient to absorb them. This imbalance creates intense competition for limited opportunities, leaving many qualified individuals unemployed for extended periods.
Access to finance also remains a major barrier for young Nigerians who wish to venture into entrepreneurship. Despite the creativity and entrepreneurial spirit that many youths possess, the lack of access to credit facilities, mentorship, and business support systems makes it difficult for them to establish and sustain their own enterprises. This challenge is further compounded by infrastructural deficits, such as unreliable power supply and limited access to technology.
Security challenges across various parts of the country have also worsened the situation. In some regions, economic hardship and lack of opportunities have made young people susceptible to recruitment into violent or extremist activities. This not only exacerbates insecurity but also diverts the energy of the youth away from productive engagement.
Addressing youth unemployment in Nigeria requires a comprehensive and collaborative approach. The government must take the lead by implementing policies that promote economic diversification, particularly by investing in agriculture, manufacturing, and the digital economy. These sectors hold immense potential for job creation and can absorb a large portion of the unemployed youth population.
Equally important is the reform of the educational system to emphasize skill acquisition, vocational training, and entrepreneurship. Schools and institutions must align their curricula with market needs, ensuring that graduates are equipped with relevant and practical skills. Public-private partnerships can play a vital role in facilitating internships, apprenticeships, and job placement programs.
The private sector also has a crucial role to play in driving job creation and innovation. By investing in youth-focused initiatives and supporting startups, businesses can help unlock the potential of young Nigerians. Additionally, financial institutions should develop more accessible and youth-friendly credit schemes to support small and medium-sized enterprises.
On an individual level, young people must embrace self-development, adaptability, and continuous learning. In an increasingly competitive and evolving global economy, acquiring digital skills, engaging in vocational training, and exploring entrepreneurial opportunities can significantly improve employability.
In conclusion, youth unemployment remains one of the most pressing challenges facing Nigeria today. However, it is not an insurmountable problem. With deliberate policies, strategic investments, and collective action from government, the private sector, and individuals, Nigeria can transform its youth population into a powerful engine of growth and development. By empowering young people with opportunities, skills, and resources, the nation can secure a more prosperous and stable future.
IVARA Favour Isaac is a student of Pan-African Institute of Management and Technology.
By:  Ivara Favour Isaac
Continue Reading

Opinion

Ozoro Festival: Tradition or Tyranny?

Published

on

Quote:“These images are not merely disturbing; they represent a direct assault on human dignity, bodily autonomy, and the rule of law.”
In recent days, national attention has turned to the small community of Ozoro in Delta State, where what was once described as a cultural fertility rite—the Alue-Do Festival—has become the subject of outrage, grief, and urgent national reflection. According to accounts from notable indigenes of Ozoro and the Isoko ethnic group, the festival was originally conceived as a symbolic ritual intended to bless couples struggling with conception. In theory, it was meant to celebrate life, continuity, and communal identity. However, what reportedly unfolded on March 22 bore no resemblance to any noble cultural ideal. Videos circulating widely on social media show groups of men chasing women, forcibly stripping them, and subjecting them to sexual assault in public spaces. These images are not merely disturbing; they represent a direct assault on human dignity, bodily autonomy, and the rule of law.
They compel us to confront a difficult but necessary question: when does tradition cease to be culture and become tyranny? It is encouraging that prominent voices—including the First Lady, the Minister of Women Affairs, human rights organisations, and women’s advocacy groups—have condemned these barbaric acts. The Delta State Government has since banned the Alue-Do Festival, while law enforcement authorities have reportedly made arrests. Yet beyond the immediate outrage lies a deeper and more uncomfortable conversation—one that communities across the country must confront honestly: the thin line between culture and abuse. “Culture is not static—it evolves, or at least, it should.” Culture is often described as the soul of a people, encompassing traditions, beliefs, and practices passed down through generations. Nigeria is richly endowed with diverse cultural heritage, much of which we rightly celebrate.
 However, when culture becomes a shield for harmful practices, it loses its moral authority. When actions that violate fundamental human rights are justified in the name of tradition, we must ask: whose culture is this, and at what cost? The events in Ozoro illustrate how a practice that may once have held symbolic meaning can devolve into something deeply harmful. Even if the Alue-Do Festival began as a benign fertility rite, its present manifestation—marked by violence and coercion—cannot be defended. “Culture must align with dignity, consent, and respect—anything less is not tradition, but abuse.” One of the most persistent arguments in defence of controversial practices is that they are “part of our heritage” and therefore beyond criticism. Yet harmful practices—child marriage, inhumane widowhood rites, and domestic abuse—have long been justified using this same reasoning. This argument is not only flawed; it is dangerous. No culture is above scrutiny, particularly when it endangers the rights and safety of its people.
History reminds us that many practices once considered “normal” are now widely condemned. Societies progress by questioning and reforming such practices—not by clinging to them. Nigeria is not exempt from this reality. As a nation governed by law and constitutional principles, we cannot afford to tolerate practices that undermine the rights of citizens—especially women. At the heart of the Ozoro incident lies a broader societal issue: the perception of women as objects rather than autonomous individuals. The actions of the perpetrators were not isolated—they were enabled by a mindset that sees women’s bodies as accessible, controllable, and, in some contexts, communal property. “Women are not possessions, prizes, or objects of exploitation—they are individuals with rights, agency, and dignity.” This mindset reflects a deeper systemic problem often described as “rape culture,” visible in victim-blaming narratives, the dismissal of harassment, and the silence that frequently surrounds abuse.
 For meaningful change to occur, this mindset must be confronted directly. Parents, religious institutions, government agencies, and the media all have critical roles to play in reshaping societal attitudes. Traditional institutions also wield significant influence, particularly in rural communities. With that influence comes responsibility—not only to preserve culture but to ensure that cultural practices align with contemporary standards of human rights and decency.The reported denial by the Ovie of Ozoro Kingdom of knowledge of the recent festival raises important questions about oversight and accountability. Community leaders and members alike must rise to their responsibilities. Cultural practices are sustained by collective acceptance. Silence, indifference, or complicity only perpetuate harm. While cultural reform is essential, it must be accompanied by accountability. The arrests made in connection with the incident are a step in the right direction, but they must lead to tangible outcomes. “Justice must not only be done—it must be seen to be done.”
 Allowing perpetrators of sexual violence to go unpunished sends a dangerous message—that such actions are tolerable. This fosters a culture of impunity. The law must be clear and unequivocal: sexual assault, in any form and under any guise, is a crime. It is not a cultural expression—it is a violation.It must be emphasised that calling for the abandonment of harmful cultural practices is not an attack on tradition, but a call to refine it.  Culture, at its best, is dynamic—it adapts while preserving its core values.“Tradition should uplift, not oppress.” Modernising culture does not mean erasing identity. It means ensuring that traditions remain relevant, inclusive, and respectful of human dignity. As Nigeria continues to evolve, it must decide what kind of society it aspires to be: one that hides behind tradition to justify abuse, or one that embraces progress while honouring its heritage responsibly. The outrage over the events in Ozoro is justified—but outrage alone is not enough
. It must translate into action: legal, cultural, and educational. We must state, without ambiguity, that no tradition justifies the violation of human dignity. We must hold perpetrators accountable and challenge the attitudes that enable such acts. True development is measured not only by infrastructure or economic growth, but by how a society treats its most vulnerable members. “If a cultural practice dehumanises, degrades, or endangers, it has no place in a modern society.” Where tradition fails to uphold dignity, it ceases to be culture. It becomes tyranny.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Bazia  EXCO @ One: NUJ Rivers Reawakened

Published

on

Quote: “For the first time in years, Rivers journalists are not just hearing promises—they are seeing a union that works.”
The first year in office of the Paul Bazia-led executive of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), has offered something many had almost given up on—renewed confidence in union leadership. For a body as critical as the NUJ, whose responsibility goes beyond professional coordination to include the welfare, protection, and continuous development of journalists, expectations are always high. Unfortunately, past experiences had conditioned many members to expect less—less action, less visibility, and less impact.This is why the past twelve months stand out. Within a relatively short period, the Bazia-led administration has demonstrated a level of drive that distinguishes it from its predecessors. There is a noticeable shift from inertia to activity, from routine administration to purposeful leadership. Initiatives captured in the one-year report point to an executive that understands both the urgency of its mandate and the frustrations of its members.
Particularly commendable is the renewed attention to journalists’  welfare. For too long, welfare issues have lingered without meaningful resolution, leaving many practitioners feeling unsupported. The current leadership’s efforts—through engagement, structured support, and timely interventions—signal a welcome change in priorities. Equally important is the push toward professional development. In an era where journalism is rapidly evolving, capacity building is no longer optional. The administration’s commitment to training and skill enhancement reflects an understanding that a stronger union must be built on more competent and competitive professionals. There is also something to be said about visibility and voice. A vibrant NUJ must not only serve its members internally but also stand as a credible voice in the public space—defending press freedom, promoting ethical standards, and constructively engaging critical issues.
Encouragingly, the current executive appears more present and responsive, giving the union a renewed sense of relevance. Perhaps what resonates most, however, is the sense of movement. For many members, the difference between the present and the immediate past is not subtle—it is clear. Where there was once stagnation, there is now direction. Where there was doubt, there is growing belief. Beyond the visible strides recorded within this first year, what perhaps deserves even greater applause is the restoration of institutional confidence within the Nigeria Union of Journalists. For a long time, many members had grown disenchanted, viewing the union more as a ceremonial body than an active force capable of defending their interests and advancing their welfare. That narrative, however, is gradually changing. The Bazia-led executive has not only initiated programs but has also rekindled a sense of belonging among members.
 Meetings appear more purposeful, engagements more intentional, and decisions more reflective of collective interest. This psychological shift—subtle as it may seem—is one of the most critical achievements of the past year, because a union that its members believe in is already halfway to effectiveness. It is also important to underscore the contrast with the immediate past, not as an exercise in criticism, but as a necessary context for measuring progress. Where previous administrations struggled to translate plans into action, the current leadership has shown a greater bias for execution. Projects that once lingered in discussion stages are now seeing tangible movement, and issues that were previously deferred are receiving attention. This difference in approach—moving from prolonged deliberation to decisive action—has helped reposition the union as a more responsive and relevant institution.
While no administration is without its shortcomings, the willingness to act, even in the face of constraints, marks a significant departure from what members were accustomed to. Looking ahead, the expectations of members—and indeed the wider public—will only grow stronger. With a solid first year behind it, the Bazia-led executive now carries the burden of consistency. Members will expect deeper welfare interventions that go beyond immediate relief to more sustainable support systems. They will look for expanded training opportunities that prepare journalists for the rapidly changing media landscape. They will also expect a firmer, more courageous voice on issues affecting press freedom and professional integrity. Above all, they will demand continuity—assurance that the progress recorded so far is not a fleeting phase but the beginning of a sustained transformation.
Meeting these expectations will not be easy, but it is precisely this challenge that defines enduring leadership. That said, this moment of applause must also serve as a moment of reflection. A strong first year inevitably raises expectations. Journalists in Rivers State will now look beyond initial achievements toward consolidation. Welfare interventions must become more structured and far-reaching. Training programs must be sustained and expanded. Advocacy must become more consistent and impactful. Most importantly, the unity of the union must be strengthened, ensuring that all members feel included and carried along. Transparency will also be key. Continued open communication about finances, decisions, and challenges will deepen trust and set a standard for accountable union leadership. The task ahead is clear: to convert early momentum into lasting institutional progress.
For the Bazia-led executive, the opportunity is significant. It has, within one year, reawakened belief in what the NUJ Rivers State Council can be. The next step is to ensure that this renewed energy does not fade, but instead becomes the foundation of a stronger, more responsive, and more respected union. For the members, the message is equally clear—expect more, demand more, and support what works because in the end, a vibrant union is not built by leadership alone, but by a collective commitment to progress. And for now, under Bazia, that progress has truly begun.
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Continue Reading

Trending