Connect with us

News

Reps In Rowdy Session Over Tinubu’s Tax Reform Bills

Published

on

It was a rowdy session in the House of Representatives plenary, yesterday, following the declaration of support for President Bola Tinubu’s tax reform bills by the spokesman of the Green Chamber, Mr Akin Rotimi.
Rotimi, a member of the All Progressives Congress, incurred the wrath of his colleagues when he stood up to present two reports on behalf of the Chairman, Committee on Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring, Boma Goodhead, who was absent at yesterday’s plenary.
The Speaker, Tajudeen Abbas, who presided over the plenary, recognised Rotimi as conducting the brief exercise.
Rotimi chose to inform his colleagues about the stand of Ekiti federal lawmakers on the controversial four tax bills transmitted to the parliament on September 3, 2024.
He said, “Mr Speaker, I am from Ekiti State, the first state whose National Assembly caucus has unanimously endorsed the tax bills.”
Members present at plenary did not allow him to complete his sentence as shouts of “No, no thereafter”, rented the air.
Repeated appeals by the speaker to restore order failed, as members vowed that the report would not be laid.
The Speaker waded in, saying “He is expressing his personal opinion”, just as the Ekiti lawmaker reminded his colleagues that he had the protection of the presiding officer.
Abbas’ remark that “He (Rotimi) was just talking on a lighter note. Let’s not take it seriously,” failed to calm frayed nerves.
Rotimi continued, “My introduction does not affect the substantive matter,” just as the speaker urged him to be restricted “to the person you are representing here. We are not talking about tax bills.”
With barely any way out for him, Rotimi said, “Hon colleagues, I withdraw the introduction. Mr Speaker, I withdraw the introduction. I will introduce myself properly. Mr Speaker, can I have the opportunity to speak?”
Abbas thereafter took over, saying “Mr Rotimi, you know this (tax bill) is a controversial issue. I don’t want you to be mentioning things that are not relevant to the subject matter. On your behalf, I withdraw that statement that you have made.”
With a semblance of order in place, Rotimi again stood up, saying, “Hon, colleagues, I would like to withdraw that introduction and restrict myself to the Order Paper.”
He later introduced himself without a word on the tax bills and laid a background of the report he was to present on behalf of Goodhead.
That said, the speaker asked for a seconder only for members to revert to the shouting mode, forcing the Speaker to again call for caution.
“I beg you. This has nothing to do with the tax bills,” Abbas pleaded repeatedly, all to no avail.
With all options exhausted, Rotimi took to the floor once again.
“I seek the leave of the Speaker and Hon members to step down the report,” he said.
Like Rotimi, the deputy spokesman of the House of Representatives, Philip Agbese also had his dose of trouble when Kano lawmaker, Tijjani Ghali, standing on a matter of personal explanation (Order 6 rule 5), called on the former to resign from his position.
He said, “I woke up this morning to see an online publication from the deputy spokesman, saying that those opposed to tax reform bills are seeking speedy passage. I am one of the first persons that opposed these bills vehemently but the deputy spokesperson did not contact me as a stakeholder and did not seek my opinion on this.
“The heading is insinuating that for those who opposed these tax bills, there is an inducement somewhere. Therefore, I am calling for the withdrawal of this statement and an investigation and apology in print media because this is injurious to me, my people, my religion and the region where I come from.
“Mr Speaker, this is a breach of privilege and is unprofessional, unethical and immoral. Therefore, I am personally calling (chorus, we are calling) for this matter to be investigated to find out those people opposed to the bills that are now asking for their speedy passage.”
The member representing Jibia/Kaita Federal Constituency, Katsina State, Sada Soli, moved that the matter be referred to the Ethics and Privileges Committee for investigation.
Ruling on the matter, Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Kalu, promised action, stating “Once a point of privilege is moved, it is not debated. You have asked for this to be investigated. But you did not tell whether to move it to ethics and privileges and that is why Sada Soli came with his own. It is not in your prayer. There are many ways to investigate this.”

Continue Reading

News

25 Killed In Adamawa Jihadist Attacks

Published

on

At least 25 people were killed in two separate jihadist attacks in Adamawa state, local sources told AFP, yesterday.

The attacks in the towns of Madagali and Hong in the border region with Cameroon were attributed to Boko Haram jihadists, whose fighters have been active in the area since the group began its violent insurgency in 2009.

“Gunmen, we believed to be Boko Haram on many motorcycles… attacked the market. They opened fire on people and killed 21,” a Madagali local government official told AFP about the Tuesday evening attack, on the condition of anonymity.

“We are still searching for more bodies as some might have died in the bush from gunshot wounds while trying to find safety.”

The attackers also looted a market and stole food items and motorcycles, the source said.

Four others, including three troops, were killed in neighbouring Hong, resident Ezekiel Musa told AFP.

“Boko Haram attacked us after they left the town. We saw the corpses of three soldiers and one woman was killed,” Musa said.

Now the town has security personnel but some of us have already started leaving the town because of fear of what happened.”

Adamawa State Governor, Adamu Umaru Fintiri, condemned the attack without providing an official toll in a statement.

“We will not let terrorists undermine our efforts to restore peace and stability,” he said in the statement.

“I warn perpetrators: desist from these senseless attacks or face the full weight of our collective resolve.”

Since 2009, the jihadist insurgency in Nigeria, led primarily by Boko Haram and its rival faction, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), has left more than 40,000 dead and two million displaced in the northeast of the country, according to the United Nations.

Nigeria is also grappling with other armed groups that have compounded its insecurity challenges in the north of the country.

The jihadist conflict has spread to neighbouring Niger, Chad, and Cameroon, prompting the formation of a regional military coalition to fight these groups.

The coalition has lost steam in recent years after the withdrawal of Niger due to a diplomatic spat with Nigeria following a 2023 military coup in Niger.

Earlier this month, the United States began deploying troops to Nigeria to provide technical and training support to the country’s soldiers in fighting the jihadist groups.

The US Africa Command said 200 troops were expected to join the deployment overall.

Continue Reading

News

S’South Group Writes Tinubu, Seeks Executive Order On 13% Derivation Fund

Published

on

A socio-political group in the South-South, the Niger Delta Civil Society Forum, has written an open letter to President Bola Tinubu, raising constitutional concerns over what it described as the illegal and unconstitutional implementation of the 13 per cent Derivation Fund in the country.

In the open letter, signed by its Coordinator, Ezekiel Kagbala, copies of which were made available to journalists in Warri, yesterday, the forum warned that “the prevailing practice undermines the supremacy of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and continues to shortchange oil-producing communities of the Niger Delta.”

While noting that it was “compelled to speak out in the spirit of patriotism, constitutionalism, and justice,” the forum maintained that “oil and gas matters are expressly listed under Item 39 of the Exclusive Legislative List in Part I of the Second Schedule to the Constitution, covering mines and minerals, including oilfields, oil mining, geological surveys, and natural gas.”

The forum appealed to Tinubu to, “without further delay, issue an Executive Order to correct the alleged anomalies by ensuring lawful administration of the 13% Derivation Fund.”

This, it stated, should include the establishment of a 13% Derivation Fund Board in each oil- and gas-producing state and the constitution of a Presidential Monitoring Committee to guarantee transparency, accountability, and strict constitutional compliance.

“This appeal is not political; it is constitutional. It is not adversarial; it is corrective,” the forum said, reiterating that “continued unconstitutional handling of the Derivation Fund undermines the rule of law and deprives host communities of the justice the Constitution guarantees them.”

The open letter added, “By the doctrine of separation of powers, only the Federal Government, acting through the President, has jurisdiction over matters on the Exclusive Legislative List.

“State governors and state assemblies lack constitutional authority to legislate on, administer, or appropriate funds derived from oil and gas resources.

“Yet, for over thirty years, governors of oil- and gas-producing states and their state assemblies have exercised control over derivation funds.”

The forum described the ongoing practice as “persistent constitutional overreach and illegality.”

It cited Section 162(2) of the 1999 Constitution, which provides that the principle of derivation shall be “not less than thirteen per cent of the revenue accruing to the Federation Account from any natural resources.”

The forum argued that under the derivation principle, the 13% Derivation Fund is a first-line charge on the Federation Account, constitutionally set aside before the remaining 87 per cent is shared among the Federal, State, and Local Governments.

“In law and practice, first-line charges are paid directly to beneficiaries. The Federal Government is a second-line charge, states third-line, and local governments fourth-line,” the forum explained.

It added, “The current practice of handing the 13% Derivation Fund to state governors to administer has no constitutional foundation and undermines transparency, accountability, and the intent of the Constitution.”

The forum recalled that when Chief Wellington Okrika, popularly known as “Mr. 13 Per Cent,” spearheaded the historic struggle for the derivation principle, state governors were not part of that agitation.

According to the NDCSF, no compensation or formal recognition was ever accorded to Chief Okrika, despite his central role in advancing the derivation principle from which oil-producing states now benefit.

“The present mindless abuse of the derivation principle by political actors who neither fought for it nor respect its constitutional foundations is unjust, morally troubling, and capable of attracting international intervention if allowed to continue unchecked,” the forum posited.

To further support its position, the NDCSF referenced constitutional precedents. It recalled that under President Shehu Shagari, when derivation stood at 1.5 per cent, the funds were not disbursed to governors but managed through presidential oversight and monitoring structures.

Similarly, the forum noted that when General Ibrahim Babangida increased derivation to 3 per cent, he established OMPADEC to centrally administer the funds, in recognition of oil and gas being on the Exclusive Legislative List.

“These actions respected constitutional boundaries and provided clear models for lawful and transparent administration,” the letter stated.

The NDCSF expressed concern over what it described as persistent silence by federal authorities despite repeated submissions of documents and constitutional references on the matter.

Concluding, the group said it trusts in Tinubu’s commitment to constitutionalism and reform and expressed hope for decisive action that will finally align the implementation of the 13% Derivation Fund with the letter and spirit of the Constitution.

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Labour Issues Ultimatum To FG Over Wage Arrears

Published

on

Organised labour in the Federal public service has issued a Friday deadline to the Federal Government, demanding the immediate release of funds to settle three months’ outstanding wage awards and other pending allowances owed to workers across Ministries, Departments and Agencies.

The leadership of the Joint National Public Service Negotiating Council (Trade Union Side) conveyed the ultimatum in a letter addressed to the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment, warning that failure to meet the February 27, 2026, deadline would compel the eight unions in the civil service to take decisive action.

The unions accused the government of withholding funds meant for workers, alleging that relevant agencies were prepared to process payments once the Ministry of Finance released the required funds.

The wage award dispute, which has persisted for over two years, followed the Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 minimum wage after the removal of fuel subsidy.

Labour leaders stated that although partial payments were made after sustained pressure, three months remain unpaid since July 2024, heightening tension within the federal workforce.

In a letter addressed to the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, the union stated: “This wage award has dragged on for over two years now since the implementation of the N70,000 minimum wage payment was approved.”

The unions recalled that “the wage award was approved as a cushioning measure following fuel subsidy removal and was to run until the commencement of the new minimum wage implementation in July 2024.

“It is beyond the imagination and expectations of federal workers that the Federal Government left five months unpaid ab initio; not until there was much pressure did the Federal Government effect the staggered payment of two months, leaving the balance of three months since July 2024 unpaid.”

The JNPSNC further alleged that “all relevant government agencies responsible for effecting payment are prepared to do so but are constrained by the non-release of funds by the Ministry of Finance.

“Available information revealed that all government agencies responsible for the payment of the wage award are ready to pay, but this is subject to the release of funds by the Honourable Minister of Finance, who is deliberately holding back the money.”

Beyond the wage award arrears, the unions listed other outstanding obligations requiring urgent attention, including promotion arrears for workers elevated more than three years ago, salary arrears for employees recruited between 2015 and 2024, and the proper implementation of a 40 per cent peculiar allowance based on the N70,000 minimum wage.

Warning of possible industrial action, the unions declared: “If the money meant for the payment of the wage award is not released on or before Friday, 27th February, 2026, the national leadership will take the bull by the horn and ensure appropriate actions are taken.”

They insisted that workers’ entitlements must not be treated with levity and that employees should not be subjected to undue hardship over delayed payments.

Copies of the letter were also forwarded to the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Nigeria Labour Congress, the Trade Union Congress, security agencies and affiliate unions for urgent attention.

Continue Reading

Trending