Opinion
Appraising The Mercenary Culture
Bright Amirize
“Our values must be tested against fact and experience, so long as we recall that they demand deeds and not just words” – Barak Obama, in the Audacity of Hope.
A mercenary is one whoseactions, performances or duties do not derive from personal conviction, volition, or commitment, but largely from hope of personal gains or fear of penalty or exposure. To carry out a duty with some mask over the face points in that direction. Mercenaries operate not only in the battle fields but even in university lecture halls, sacred places and political terrains. Any duty in private or official capacity which does not flow from personal volition, conviction and commitment is a duty that would not yield lasting value to the performer.
The question of value has much to do with what an individual holds sacred as an ideal that he embraces with conviction, commitment and loyalty. From such platform arises what gives meaning to the individual in life and the motivating force in what he does or seeks.
Those who do not have such cherished orientation in life qualify to be classified as mercenaries or occupational misfits. Individuals find joy, satisfaction and personal fulfillment doing what gives them value and meaning, not derivable from pecuniary gains.
It is quite dehumanizing for any individual to function like a robot or automation, teleguided by an alien force, for sale or purchase, given the polite name of mercenary. It’s mere hypocrisy!
Nation-building is a sacred duty which cannot be undertaken without qualitative personal values that bear the stamp of conviction, commitment and loyalty, which we call patriotism. Those who go into politics without such personal orientation can be classified as mercenaries.
Wherever the aforementioned core values and personal orientations become the driving force in what an individual does, duty becomes not only a pleasure, but a mission. Unfortunately, many developing nations are usually infested by mercenaries in various callings and activities, arising from many factors. The situation becomes more pathetic for nations that discard merit and the principles of selectiveness and justice in public appointments. Nigeria chose that way, the harvest is here.
No matter what material gains that mercenaries make, they are usually short-changed and de-valued on the long-run. Human life on earth is not a cheap bargain or a one-sided cash-and-carry affair.
The mercenary culture had arisen in the Nigerian political activities largely because of foundational and structural imbalances which cannot be unshed away or whose existence cannot be denied. What we call corrupt practices, including election rigging and defection from one political party to another, are parts of the manifestations of what we fear to address, but postpone.
Patriotism in its true meaning derives from a purpose-driven and value-based national ideology, whereby service rather than wealth and fame drive and define political career. So far, this foundation or orientation is lacking in our political culture. The evolution of a personal or national political culture demands the articulation of enduring and qualitative values to which politicians must remain committed with unwavering loyalty. Perhaps, Nigeria is yet to develop a true national identity. When would that be?
Arising from unresolved national issues, defection is one evidence of political shenanigans which makes the average politician a mercenary who can put a price-tag on what he represents or the value he holds. He goes into the market perhaps not for himself alone but at best to make himself a commodity for and on behalf of his “constituency”. In a situation where personal merit and integrity do not count, a rat-race coupled with ruthless scrambles would win rather than honesty. A mere pyrrhic victory in the true sense!
There is a psychological law which stipulates that the mind works against an individual when, behind his activities and engagements, there are some fears, doubts, guilt-feeling or crisis of the conscience. In many cases, things would work out well on the short-term, but on the long-run, the individual would pay some sad prices for the wound inflicted on the conscience. Wherever there is a gap between good conscience or personal conviction and the duty or activity that one performs, there is a sad price to be paid, sooner or later. Wherever decisions and actions stray from personal conviction, derailment follows, in spite of hypocritical self-righteousness.
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer at the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
