Opinion
Changing The Face of Nigeria’s Leadership
With its abundant human and natural resources, Nigeria apparently has the most enviable economic profile on the African continent. It has an area of over 923,773 square kilometers, the largest single geographical unit along the West Coast of Africa and a population of 140,000,000 at the 2006 census, the largest in Africa. Nigeria is the leading producer of crude oil and gas in Africa and the 6th in the world. It is also a leading world producer of coal, tin, and columbite.
But despite its abundant gifts from God, Nigeria has within its 50 years of nationhood remained a land of poverty, famine, chaos, violence, instability, failed projects and unfulfilled promises.
What is the trouble with Nigeria? To many, Nigeria’s crisis is blamable on poor leadership. In the language of the internationally acclaimed author, Chinua Achebe, “… Nigeria has been less than fortunate in its leadership”.
Nigeria’s leadership question has several dimensions. According to Chinua Achebe, “A basic element of this misfortune is the seminal absence of intellectual rigour in the political thought of our founding fathers, a tendency to pious materialistic wooliness and self-centred pedestrianism”.
Other dimensions of Nigeria’s leadership question include authoritarianism, lack of vision, patriotism, and accountability, and social injustice and corruption.
In recognition of this perverse leadership question, the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, on several occasions, promised to change the face of leadership in Nigeria. He agreed that the concept of leadership had been bastardised in the country resulting in people using leadership position to show arrogance, oppress others, and misappropriate resources meant for the generality of Nigerians, instead of serving them as directed by God.
In the same vein, President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, while declaring his intention to contest the 2011 presidential election on September 18, 2010 at the Eagle Square, Abuja, acknowledged the serious need for a new kind of leadership for the Nigerian nation.
It has become apparent that neither an abundance of human and natural resources nor the best economic policies in the world will solve the country’s development problems if its leadership question is not addressed.
But changing the face of leadership in Nigeria must go beyond economic and socio-political phenomenon. It must be approached as a multi-dimensional process encompassing the economic, social, political and spiritual spheres of the nation and its citizens. Why? Because it is the spiritual sphere that propels the economic and socio-political life of any society or the individual.
Nigeria is a multi-religious nation. But I think the meeting point of the various religions is love, selfless service to God Almighty and human kind, the practice of spiritual discipline and the happiness of their adherents. The transformation of corrupt attitude, intolerance, vanity, greed, lust of power, and wealth and other perversions which have blocked the country’s path to development and the happiness of its citizens is possible only through strict spiritual discipline and the deep knowledge of God.
It is in the light of this that the assertion of the chairman, Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Attahiru M. Jega at a public lecture organised by ECKANKER Nigeria on September 23, 2010 at the Women Development Centre, Abuja that the task of developing credible leaders is a collective one by which Faith Based Organisations (FBOs) have a very important role to play is most instructive in addressing the country’s leadership question. In the words of Professor Jega in his paper titled Developing Credible Leaders: The Role of Faith-Based Organisations: “Our country can fare better, much better, if all stakeholders, especially our FBOs commit themselves to positive engagement in a multi-faith society to produce a patriotic leadership cadre that can hold public positions in trust, be responsible and responsive to popular needs and aspirations, be transparent and accountable and effectively and efficiently pilot Nigeria’s democratic development on the basis of fairness and equity for all citizens”. To him, this will involve encouraging the FBOs to nurture leaders who are broad-minded, fair minded and credible through moral teachings of scriptures, on honesty, accountability and peaceful co-existence.
Nigeria, being a highly religious nation with virtually the entire populace belonging to one religious organisation or the other, will depend a lot on the religious bodies to produce men and women that will change the face of leadership in the country.
The essence of leadership is to facilitate the attainment of individual, group, and above all, national goals.
Leadership is therefore valueless if it does not bring about the fulfilment of the needs of the people, the good life. It is valueless if it does not engender inner harmony, well-being and most importantly the happiness of the people. It is valueless if it does not offer the people life-sustenance, self-esteem, freedom from servitude, food, shelter, full employment, health, education, and a general sense of hopefulness.
But as observed by Ogundiya Ilufoye Sarafa in his paper, Religious Ideals and Responsible Leadership: The Shepherd Model and Lesson for Nigeria’s Fledgling Democracy, “Nigeria’s political history has shown that the shepherd style of political leadership has eluded the country. Contemporary leaders of various levels of governance in Nigeria are nothing but profiteers, syndicateers, and racketeers operating in formal circuits and whose activities do not promote the well-being of all citizens.
Strictly speaking, Nigeria’s leadership question has become a jigsaw puzzle, a huge challenge. It has become a debilitating disease that has continued to rob members of the subordinate class of their happiness.
But as the Spiritual Leader of ECKANKAR, Sri Harold Klemp says: “A solution exists for every challenge to our peace of mind. There is always a way, somehow. What holds us from happiness is our lack of faith in the power of the Holy Spirit to address our most humble needs”.
Thus, the solution to Nigeria’s leadership quagmire is not far fetched. But we must, with faith in the power of the Holy Spirit, assiduously seek it as a drowning man craves for air.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers4 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News4 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News4 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics4 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics4 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
