Editorial

Mugabe: End Of An Era?

Published

8 years ago

November 27, 2017

Ostensibly exasperated by the oscillatory nature of power in the naïve Britain of his time, British politician and classical scholar, John Powell saw political terrain as a vast wilderness of inconclusive masterpiece. “All political lives, unless they are cut off in midstream at a happy juncture,” Powell warns in a moment of deep gloom, “end in failure, because that is the nature of politics and of human affairs.”
Nothing really evidences this more than the political life of Robert Mugabe which was ended rather ignomiously last Tuesday in Zimbabwe by the furious lava of the political volcano that had erupted a few days earlier in the poor Southern African country.
Mugabe’s political odyssey reached a point of no return when he, in a flagrant and arrogant display of abject political naivety, sacked the country’s Vice President, Emmerson Mnangagwa in an Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU-PF) intra-party rift that the Army watched with keen interest.
Mnangagwa’s sack, clearly in breach of Zimbabwe’s constitution, was inelegantly contrived to prime his wife, Grace, 62, known to her critics as ‘Gucci Grace’ for her obsession with luxury dropping, for the presidency in the event of his death. Small wonder then that the military, in reviewing the unwholesome political development, confined Mugabe to his Blue Proof mansion to restore order.
Even at that, Mugabe clung on to power for a week after the military putsch, despite entreaties from his ZANU-PF to quit office. However, Mugabe threw in the towel just as the Zimbabwean parliament began an impeachment process as a last resort to force the 93-year old, frail looking despot out of office.
Mugabe, before his disgraceful end, bestrode Zimbabwe’s political landscape like a magnificent colossus for almost four decades during which he foisted his beliefs and a reign of terror on his beleaguered people with mercurial audacity.
He had since April 18, 1980 led Zimbabwe after a guerilla struggle which had cost him his freedom but ended the lan Smith-led apartheid regime in the then Southern Rhodesia.
The self-styled Grand Old Man of African Politics was initially admired by many for his egalitarian and anti-imperialistic rhetoric which gave hope of a purposeful and visionary leadership to an unwary populace just emerging from the stranglehold of racist and colonial interlopers. In fact, he had, at independence, extended an olive branch to the former white supremacists for a new order: “Forget our grimy past, forgive others and forget.”
At another occasion, Mugabe had stated rhetorically: “I am still the Hitler of the time. This Hitler has only one objective, justice for his own people, sovereignty for his people, recognition of the independence of his people, and their right to their resources… If that is Hitler, then let me be a Hitler tenfold. Ten times, that is what we stand for.”
With all that pledge, he was considered a hero as aids and foreign direct investments from Europe and other countries flowed in. Zimbabwe’s economy got a boost just as it recorded the highest literacy level in Africa. But his naturalisation of white-owned farms drove away the few white farmers who escaped murder away was his Achilles Heel. Thus, began food shortages and the journey of the once-rich country to economic ruin.
With a crumbling economy, his popularity plummeted as opposition to his rule grew in the late 1990s. And like his co-travellers in that self-destructive adventure in power, Mugabe kept his grip on power through repression of opponents, boasting to remain in power until he clocks 100. He amended the constitution at will and made himself eligible, even at 93, to contest the country’s August 2018 presidential poll.
Zimbabwe’s exit from the Commonwealth in 2003, following an European Union (EU) travel ban on him, has only served as a tribute to his abysmal democratic records which he was not ready to improve until his resignation last Tuesday.
With hyperinflation and the country’s unemployment rate hitting 95 per cent, amongst other cheerless economic indices that have forced its nationals to seek better living in South Africa and other countries, the jubilation that greeted Mugabe’s exit and the pomp, pageantry and manifold emotion that hallmarked Mnangagwa’s inauguration last Friday were expected. Albeit, to many political observers, an era may have ended.
While The Tide congratulates Zimbabweans for their steadfastness, the Mugabe era can only be truly seen as having ended when the new leader who was a critical part of that inglorious era strictly adheres to the 2018 presidential election time table and keeps the military at bay. So, it is not yet uhuru!
As The Tide wishes Mnangagwa a successful tenure in office, the Zimbabwean military deserves no less a commendation for exhibiting a high level of maturity and patriotism in handling the country’s political crisis and in ensuring a smooth transition.
Similarly, we urge the military high command in other African countries to borrow a leaf from the Zimbabwean military which, though, had the opportunity to stay on to power, but rather chose to respect constitutional authority.
Mugabe started as a hero and ended a villain. No thanks to power drunkenness. Herein lies the lessons from Harare which must be imbibed by all African leaders who are wont to cling to power for life.
All that is needed now is support for the new leader to stabilise the polity and chart a new path to Zimbabwe’s development and progress.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

1 day ago

September 22, 2025

Uchechukwu Okwum

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

1 day ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

2 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.