Editorial

2019: INEC And e-Voting

Published

8 years ago

April 12, 2017

Apparently disturbed by series of manipulations and rigging-induced crises associated with the manual voting system in Nigeria, the Senate, on March 31, 2017, made some major amendments in the nation’s Electoral Act, 2010.
Some of the amendments passed by the Red Chamber include the use of electronic voting (e-Voting) system, electronic transmission of election results and the deployment of Electronic Card Reader (ECR).
The passage of the bill on e-Voting followed the consideration of the report of the Senate Committee on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on a bill for an act to amend the Electoral Act No.6, 2010 and for other related matters (SB 231 and SB 234).
The bill provides for the use of e-Voting by INEC during future elections, use of ECR and INEC’s power to modify the voting process if there is a challenge. The bill also makes provision for INEC to transmit election results electronically in an encrypted and secured manner to prevent hacking.
With these amendments, it appears Nigeria is poised to free itself from all forms of election frauds and malfeasance that have continued to rob the nation of good representation at all tiers of government.
Given several cases of inconclusive polls during the last general elections in 2015 in the country, arising from the manipulation of the manual voting system; the cost implications of conducting rerun polls and the threats they pose to the nation’s democracy, The Tide supports any method or innovation that would help sanitise our electoral system and ipso facto strengthen the nation’s democracy.
We commend the Senate for its bold step towards ensuring credible elections in Nigeria, especially its early passage of the bill.
We believe that the bill, when signed into law, would improve the credibility of the nation’s elections and by so doing, improve our democracy and good governance.
We hope, however, that the INEC would seize the ample time provided by the early passage of the bill to prepare and work early enough ahead of the 2019 general elections.
However, novel and innovative as the e-Voting system may sound, especially with regards to its features of stemming or nipping in the bud the perennial abuses of the nation’s electoral process by desperate politicians in cohort with pliant law enforcement agents and corrupt officials of the electoral body, we are worried by the fundamental challenges that may inhibit the smooth implementation of the system.
We particularly share the skepticism of many Nigerians who fear that the introduction of such a novel system is vulnerable to manipulations and may be frustrated by a combination of human factor and the nation’s infrastructural deficit. The skepticism is not unconnected with the failure of the smart card reader introduced by INEC during the 2015 general elections. The card reader, though worked in some places, did not record a resounding success as it was almost marred by issues of malfunction of machines, battery failure and incompetence of some INEC personnel.
We, therefore, believe that there are a number of challenges that need to be tackled before Nigeria can holistically come to terms with the smooth deployment of such advanced technology as e-Voting.
We observe that apart from the current economic recession which may be a major drawback to purchasing necessary electronic voting infrastructure, the nation’s epileptic power supply and poor telecommunication network may pose serious threat to the successful implementation of the e-voting method.
There is no gainsaying the fact that many communities, especially in rural areas, are not yet connected to the national grid, let alone have access to telecommunication network. Even those that are connected in cities and rural areas are experiencing epileptic power supply and poor network.
We also want to draw the attention of the INEC to the threats posed by cyber attacks to information technology system around the world. Even the strongest nations of the world are not immune to this attack. We recall that INEC’s website was hacked in 2015 by a group that calls itself ‘Nigeria Cyber Army’.
INEC should, therefore, be prepared to tackle this challenge as the use of internet for the e-Voting will certainly expose the electoral body to further attacks.
We advise that for e-Voting system to be successful in Nigeria, the general state of infrastructure such as power supply and telecommunication network must improve; bad eggs in the police and pliant, corrupt INEC officials must be weeded out, while the menace of cyber crimes, among other challenges, must be tackled head-on.
We fear that until these challenges are squarely addressed, Nigeria may continue to chase shadows in its dream to joining the ranks of advanced societies that adopt e-Voting system.
Meanwhile, we urge the INEC, the Federal Ministry of Information and Culture and the National Orientation Agency (NOA) to carry out sufficient sensitisation on the e-Voting system, and if necessary, conduct mock elections to ascertain the workability or otherwise of the proposed new voting system before the 2019 general elections in the country.

Editorial

Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen

Published

6 hours ago

September 29, 2025

The Tide

On the 30th of August, Rivers people trooped out to participate in local government elections conducted across the state. These elections, which produced new chairmen and councillors for the 23 local government areas (LGAs), were organised by the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC). The exercise has ushered in a new crop of grassroots leaders whose shoulders now bear the responsibility of steering the affairs of their respective councils. With the polls concluded and winners duly announced, the time has come for the newly elected officials to roll up their sleeves and begin the hard work of governance.

According to the results declared by RSIEC, the All Progressives Congress (APC) secured a dominant lead, winning chairmanship seats in 20 of the 23 local government councils, while the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) clinched the remaining three. This outcome not only reflects the current political dynamics in the state but also places a significant weight of expectation on the shoulders of the APC-led councils to justify the confidence reposed in them by the electorate. It is imperative that political rhetoric now gives way to tangible development, especially at the grassroots level where government is felt most directly.

Following the elections, the successful chairmen were officially sworn into office by the former Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas. The solemn ceremony marked a transition from campaign promises to the reality of public service. With their inauguration complete, the time for celebration has ended; the time for delivery has commenced. The electorate now awaits meaningful action that reflects the hopes and aspirations of the voting public.

As helmsmen of their various LGAs, these leaders must quickly settle down to work. Their constituents expect them to provide direction, formulate policies, and execute programmes that will uplift communities long neglected. The local government tier is closest to the people and, as such, must rise above politicking to meet the everyday needs of the citizenry. It is not enough to occupy office; they must make their impact visibly and positively felt across their domains.

The Supreme Court ruling mandating direct allocation of funds to local governments—although not yet fully implemented—is a welcome development that underscores the autonomy of the third tier of government. Once this is operationalised, the excuses often cited for underperformance will no longer hold water. With funds directly accessed from the Federation Account, council administrations will be better empowered to meet the developmental needs of their localities, if only they manage resources judiciously and prioritise the right projects.

The onus is now on the chairmen to contribute meaningfully to the broader development of Rivers State. The state government cannot and should not be expected to do everything. Local government councils have defined responsibilities—ranging from rural infrastructure, primary healthcare, and basic education to waste management and local security—that must be adequately addressed. It is high time they stopped passing the buck and started acting as the elected leaders they are.

We extend our congratulations to all who emerged victorious in the elections. However, with this victory comes great responsibility. It is no longer about party affiliations or electoral campaigns; it is about governance. The chairmen must launch people-centred projects that will genuinely improve the lives of the rural populace—projects in water supply, road maintenance, school renovation, and youth empowerment, among others. Let their tenure be remembered for its impact, not its slogans.

Central to their mandate should be the welfare of workers. Council employees form the engine room of local governance, and their morale significantly affects service delivery. The new chairmen must ensure regular payment of salaries, staff training, and a conducive working environment. Neglecting this vital aspect will only hinder whatever grand plans they may have for their LGAs.

It is also essential to institute a robust peer review mechanism. The new LG officials should not operate in isolation; rather, they should learn from one another, share ideas, and compete constructively in a bid to outperform each other in service delivery. Healthy competition among council areas will drive innovation and foster accelerated development. Such a system will also help the public identify high-performing councils for emulation.

Given the typically short tenure of council administrations, it is crucial that they focus on projects that are realistic and impactful. Time and resources should not be wasted on white elephant ventures that are neither sustainable nor beneficial to the people. Instead, chairmen should pursue programmes that match their timelines and address immediate community needs.

Peace and security must remain a cardinal objective for all council steersmen. Regardless of who facilitated their election or what political loyalties they hold, they must ensure peace reigns in their areas. Development cannot thrive in an atmosphere of tension and distrust. These leaders must work closely with traditional rulers, youth groups, and civil society organisations to maintain law and order.

A critical understanding must also prevail—that chairmen are leaders of the people, not just leaders of political parties. They must conduct themselves as impartial administrators serving all constituents, irrespective of political affiliations. Additionally, they must work harmoniously with the state governor, who remains the leader of the state. Petty rivalries and political infighting serve no purpose in the development agenda.

Now that the elections are over and governance has begun, it is essential for these chairmen and councillors to adopt an inclusive approach. They must carry everyone along—party members and opposition alike—in their development plans. Creating division or playing favourites will only fracture communities and stall progress. Leadership at the grassroots demands fairness, equity, and a listening ear.

Rivers people have played their part by coming out to vote. The baton has now been passed to the new council helmsmen. They must seize the opportunity to leave lasting legacies in their communities. History will not judge them by the number of rallies they held or the speeches they gave, but by the quality of life they brought to their people. Let them not squander this moment.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

7 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.