Opinion
For A Credible Electoral Process
By his gesticulations and words in the past few weeks, Acting President Goodluck Jonathan appears committed to delivering credible polls to the nation in 2011. But Dr. Jonathan will have to back his intention with sufficient political will to convince Nigerians that are yet to recover from the trauma of the electoral fraud that passed for election in 2007. To match action with words, the Acting President sent unedited copies of the report of the Justice Mohammed Uwais-led Electoral Reform Committee to the National Assembly for debate and review of the 2006 electoral law and the 1999 constitution.
Sometimes last year, the federal government under President Yar’Adua had, against public expectations, rejected two recommendations considered central to credible election; appointment of the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, by the National Judicial Council to guarantee the commission and the conclusion of litigations arising from election before winners are sworn-in. These two recommendations and others that require the amendment of the constitution and the electoral law were sent to the National Assembly for consideration.
Recently, the Acting President promised Nigerians changes that would deliver credible election in 2011. Here are his words: “The promise I made to you today, is that we will all do all within our power to promote open, fair and transparent election. This government will insist on electoral justice and there is no going back on that.” This promise is far-reaching and offers hope to Nigerians for a change in our electoral system.
In line with Dr. Jonathan’s resolve and in anticipation of the adoption of the Uwais’ report in respect of the commencement of election, INEC released two time tables for the conduct of 2011 polls. This in my view is quite unnecessary. Considerations should have only be given to the January date, which is in anticipation of possible approval of the Uwais committee recommendation that election be conducted six months to the inauguration of winners to give room for the conclusion of election litigations. The April date on the time table is unacceptable as it amounts to a respect of past mistakes.
There is no doubt that the retention of the provisions of the 1999 constitution and 2006 Electoral Act that produced the massively flawed 2007 election cannot midwife the desired credible election. Therefore, as the National Assembly does the amendment of the constitution (even though the senate has concluded it amendment process), it is imperative for the Acting President to use his influence and lobby the legislators to adopt the sound recommendations of the Uwais Electoral Reform Committee.
The Independence of INEC is central to free and fair election. Apart from the appointment of INEC Chairman by an independent body, funding of the electoral body must come from the first line charge of the Consolidated Revenue Fund while the tenure of the chairman and the commissioners has to be insulated from executive interference.
It is no longer a secret that election rigging starts from voter registration, turns through other segments of the electoral process and ends at announcement of results. Foolproof measures should be put in place in these areas to guarantee credible elections. The recent election conducted in Ekiti, Anambra and elsewhere have shown that the nation’s voters’ register is not credible. INEC has to discard the old register and embark on a credible registration. Besides, the register has to be regularly updated.
The modified open secret ballot should be adopted for elections while announcement of result should be done at the polling booths and in the full glare of the voters and the press to check incidence of ballot box staffing, snatching and falsification of results. The media and voters should be granted unrestricted access to the monitoring of the voting process to guarantee transparency.
The tenure of Prof. Maurice Iwu, the INEC chairman, will expire in June. The agitation to either extend his tenure or not notwithstanding, there is need to place him on pre-retirement leave and allow fresh hands to immediately kick-start preparations for the conduct of the 2011 election. It is indeed shameful that in spite of Iwu’s shortcomings, some Nigerians would clamour for his retention by staging pro Iwu protests. This nation must not reward incompetence by extending the tenure of the current INEC board chairman. Those who failed the nation in 2007 must not be allowed to continue in office.
Our democracy has become very weak because voters were not allowed in previous election in the country. We cannot afford to travel the same old road again.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
