Editorial
Whither PH Explosion Report?

It is, indeed, surprising that after several months, the police authorities in Rivers State have yet to release a report or make a statement regarding the attempted dynamite attack at Hotel Presidential in Port Harcourt. This incident, which sent shockwaves throughout the state, was met with a deafening silence from law enforcement officials, leaving many to wonder about the lack of transparency and accountability in the investigation.
On that fateful day, chaos erupted in front of the prestigious hotel as a man detonated a dynamite device. The quick actions of hotel security personnel and bystanders prevented a full disaster, but the incident left a lasting impact on Port Harcourt residents in particular. The news of the attempted attack spread like wildfire, with rumors and speculations running rampant in the absence of an official statement from the authorities.
The absence of communication from the police only serves to fuel the public’s fear and uncertainty. Rivers people were left wondering about the motives behind the attack, the identity of the perpetrator, and whether there was a larger threat looming over the city. The silence from the police only added to the sense of unease and insecurity that gripped individuals in the aftermath of the incident.
In a society where trust in law enforcement is vital for maintaining peace and order, the failure of the police to provide timely and accurate information about such a significant event is deeply concerning. The public has a right to know the details of the investigation, to understand the measures being taken to ensure their safety, and to hold those responsible for the attack accountable for their actions.
The lack of transparency in this case raises serious questions about the effectiveness and integrity of the police authorities in the state. How can the public have faith in a system that fails to communicate openly and honestly about a potential threat to their safety? How can justice be served when critical information is withheld from the very people it is meant to protect?
Hence, the state police commissioner must break his silence and provide Rivers people with a comprehensive report on the attempted dynamite attack at the Presidential Hotel. The state deserves to know the facts surrounding the incident, the progress of the investigation, and the steps being taken to prevent similar threats in the future.
Many are puzzled as to why the police have failed to prosecute supporters of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister when they are apparently involved in criminal activities, yet they are quick to go after those who support Governor Siminalayi Fubara on what seem to be trumped-up charges. This inconsistency in their actions has created a sense of injustice and favouritism.
The bombing of the Rivers State House of Assembly complex and subsequent arrests and prosecution of Fubara’s followers in far away Abuja highlight a concerning trend of selective prosecution. While individuals like Asa Abuja, a former militant and supporter of the governor, are declared wanted by the state police commissioner for issuing threats, those who carry out attacks on behalf of their political master in Abuja evade accountability.
This raises questions about the impartiality of law enforcement in Rivers State and whether political affiliations play a role in determining who faces consequences for their actions. The lack of prosecution for some individuals while others face charges suggests a troubling absence of consistency and fairness in the application of justice.
The failure of the police to charge the suspect responsible for the dynamite explosion has emboldened criminals to carry out further attacks, such as the recent one on the Action People’s Party (APP) Secretariat. Valuable property was destroyed in the onslaught, causing financial losses and emotional distress to the party members. The Police must remain non-partisan in the political crisis and rise up to its constitutional responsibilities to Rivers people.
The question on everyone’s mind is why the police seem to prioritise certain cases over others, particularly when it comes to political affiliations. The perceived bias in their approach to law enforcement has only served to deepen the divide among the people and create a sense of distrust in the system. It is essential for the police to demonstrate fairness and impartiality in their dealings with all citizens, regardless of their political leanings.
To restore faith in the police force and ensure the safety and security of all citizens, it is imperative that they act swiftly and decisively in addressing criminal activities, regardless of the individuals involved and their political affiliations. The rule of law must be upheld without prejudice or favouritism, and those responsible for perpetrating violence and destruction must be held accountable for their actions.
As we reflect on the recent events in Rivers State and the failure of the police to act in a timely manner, it is clear that there is a need for reform and accountability within the law enforcement agency. The public’s trust in the police is at stake, and it is up to them to demonstrate their commitment to justice and fairness for all. Only then can we hope to see an end to the cycle of violence and injustice that plagues our state.
Editorial
Addressing The State Of Roads In PH

Editorial
Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen

Editorial
No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
-
Business4 days ago
NCDMB, NEXIM Disburse $42m Loans To Boost Local Content In Oil Sector
-
Sports4 days ago
Nigerian para-lifters win gold, silver, bronze at World Champs
-
News4 days ago
FUBARA THANKS PRESIDENT TINUBU FOR POST HUMOUS PARDON, NATIONAL HONOURS FOR OGONI 13 …Says Bold Decision’ll Promote Reconciliation
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
Edo Chief Judge Seeks Collaboration Against Corruption
-
News4 days ago
Unveiling of $400million Otakaikpo crude oil Export Terminal; Monarch Hails Tinubu …lists Economic Benefits Of The Project
-
Sports4 days ago
Swimming, football talents shine at CSL Games
-
Business4 days ago
‘Stakeholder Engagement, Bedrock Of Niger Delta Development’
-
Sports4 days ago
WAFCON Qualifiers: Falcons to face Benin in Togo