Opinion
Nation In Need Of Servant Leader (1)
I have heard people say time without number, that Leadership is everything in the art and process of governance. That Leadership is an organisation or society personified.
John C. Maxwell, in one of his best selling books titled, “Leadership Gold” says, “every human organisation. rises and falls on Leadership”.
This is simply to say that the success or failure , progress or retrogression, of a human society is inevitably a function of Leadership. The choice of a leader is the most critical factor in the development of a nation. It is a sine qua non in the value chain in the realisation of set goals of any society or organisation.
The political leadership is at the helm of affairs of all sectors of a nation. Therefore, it is not out of place to blame the leadership for the myriad of social and economic challenges, security upheavals and educational problems.
Taking a cursory and objective look at the miscellany of hydra-headed problems that bedevil Nigeria, the purported giant of Africa, one can say without an iota of doubt, and without a fear of contradiction, that Nigeria needs a leader—I mean a servant leader; one who sees himself as a steward, holding the resources of the people in trust. A leader, who understands that Leadership and accountability are an inseparable pair, like the snail and its shell. A leader who has not only cultivated passion for accountability, but is seen to be accountable.
Leadership is a trust, not a right. Though successful, result – oriented and effective leadership requires teamwork, a leader takes the blame or praise for the failure or success respectively, of his administration.
The choice of a leader in a democratic governance is essentially, in an ideal situation, the prerogative of the people. Every leader so elected or selected derives his legitimacy from the people.
The God factor in the choice of a leader depends greatly on the thinking and behaviour of a people. If a people are corrupt, God will always give them a leader that is corrupt, especially, when such a leader is a product of corrupted and perverse selection or election processes.
A nation such as Nigeria, with abundant human and natural resources could not have gone through the orgy, harrowing and painful experiences we find ourselves today, if we got the leadership issue right.
In the last few years, Nigeria has become a metaphor of hardship for the less privileged majority transiting from one gory and gloomy scenario such as insecurity to untold economic hardship.
Nigerians are graduating from one level of protracted experiences to another. The pump price of premium motor spirit (petrol) is fluctuating between N165 and N250 per litre (from N75 eight years ago) in a nation that is the sixth largest producer of crude oil. Consequently, the transport fare has increased outrageously and the prices of food and other items are astronomical. Kerosene which is the product of the down-trodden is beyond their reach as a 25-litre Jerry can is sold for N10,000. This is an anomaly. Most Nigerians live in abject poverty. There seems to be no flicker of hope, no light at the end of a long, dark tunnel except by divine intervention. Salary earners or those on fixed income are the worst hit as salary exhausts before arrival.
Ghana, a small English speaking West African country got it right some three decades ago, and today, it is a resort of academic for privileged Nigerians. While for three months, lecturers of Nigeria’s public universities are in a protracted battle with the Federal Government with no end to the impasse in sight. Students roam the streets not being certain when to graduate from a programme that has a duration.
I remembered when I was younger, between the late seventies and early eighties, Ghanaians were jeered and disparagingly told to go. The “Ghana Must Go” slogan was translated to a bag. They were virtually every where, engaged in menial jobs to eke out a living. Those experiences are now history. Today, Ghana is better economically, academically, socially etc.
Ironically, today it is the turn of Ghanaians to tell Nigerians in Ghana to go. What a shame!
The economic situation of Nigeria is not improving at all. And no improvement in sight even as the World Bank speculates that it will take thirty years to remedy the economic trauma the leadership of Gen. Muhammadu Buhari (rtd) has plunged the nation into, because of unpopular economic and financial policies and borrowing.
Little wonder, Nigerians in America prefer to remain in prison instead of returning to Nigeria. In their valuation, the living conditions of a prisoner in America is better than that of an average person that is free in Nigeria.
Why would students of Nigeria’s extraction in Ukraine initially choose to remain there even in the midst of Ukraine—Russia war with the several loss of lives and property. In my considered opinion which is not far from the truth, Nigerian students adjudged war-torn Russia and Ukraine far safer in security, economically better, educationally balanced and socially stable than Nigeria—the land of their birth where insurgents, terrorists and atrocities of varied kinds are carried out with impunity. A land where corruption, like a phoenix is treasured, so much so some public office holders are richer than some states. Looting of public treasury and common wealth is a norm.
I grieve for my fatherland. Nigerians should rise to protect and defend the labour and ideals of our founding fathers that earned the nation the sobriquet “the Giant of Africa”, not the weeping baby the nation is known today.
This change is possible through an intellectual and electoral revolution. Nigerians should discover the power of the ballot and brace up to defend their vote at all levels of elections: State Constituency, Governorship, Federal Constituency, Senate and the Presidency.
Every eligible voter should be committed to intentional change for the good of the country by resisting the penchance of accepting peanut for mortgaging the conscience and the destiny of our generation and posterity.
A concerted determination to foster and catalyse change in a detribalised perspective, is the greatest need of this country. Nigeria needs a leader. Nigeria needs a servant leader.
(To be concluded)
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Niger Delta14 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers12 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education13 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
News14 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Education13 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News14 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
