Editorial
Exam Malpractice: Hammer On Schools
No fewer than 35 secondary schools in Rivers State were recently outlawed by the West Africa Examination Council (WAEC) from presenting candidates for the Senior Secondary Certificate Examination (SSCE) over their involvement in examination malpractices. This fraud is a scourge that must be fought at all costs.
Following the development, the state Ministry of Education forwarded a letter de-recognising the affected schools and demoting their principals. This is the government’s official response to the delisting of the 35 schools by WAEC. What it simply means is that the schools affected by the ban will not register candidates for the examination until further notice.
We laud the state government and WAEC for imposing severe sanctions on the affected schools and their principals. Lamentably, some schools have acquired the notoriety of being called “miracle centres” where all manners of examination violations are authorised and where desperate candidates and their parents/guardians register to acquire spurious results.
These centres are rogue, corrupt business outfits that position themselves as regular schools, but in reality, deploy deviant means to secure unmerited SSCE results or certificates, undermining academic integrity and countrywide development. In these scamp centres, candidates can acquire unmerited desirable grades across subjects taken in SSCE, therefore, the ‘miracle’ commonly ascribed to such centres in Nigeria.
As a state that is very committed to the promotion of best practices and integrity in the conduct of examinations, and in line with its mission statement of providing a qualitative and sound education, we urge the government to resolve to go even further in stamping out the scourge of examination misconduct. The inauguration of examination ethics marshals can be beneficial.
It is expedient for stakeholders in the education sector to join hands with the state government and the various examination bodies to succeed in the war against malpractices. External candidacy, unscrupulous teachers and parents are some factors aiding malpractices. No stone should be left unturned in routing the menace. The searchlight should be beamed on all schools to detect others that are immersed in the odious act.
The state government had in the past taken drastic steps against improper professional conduct in examination with the dismissal, suspension of principals, staff, and withdrawal of approval certificates of private schools involved in the actus reus. We frown at the tacit conspiracy of those heading the discredited and delisted schools for allowing heinous fraud to happen in their centres.
There is a need for the authorities to explore the drivers that facilitate the establishment and spread of “miracle centres” as well as interventions that can be utilised to eliminate them. Proximate drivers involve the actions and inactions of certain actors that are within immediate reach of influence and at the grassroots, such as parents, community-based groups, and schools.
Remote drivers are the actions and inactions of the examination bodies and regulatory institutions that allow these centres to thrive. We consider the remote drivers to be away from immediate reach. Therefore, addressing the challenge of “miracle centres” by focusing on proximate drivers, appears to be feasible within the short and mid-terms, unlike the remote drivers.
Amazingly, Nigeria’s education system currently ranks number 124 out of 140 countries globally, making the country to be among the poorest performers in education. Examination merit and integrity are part of the indicators of a well-performing education system. Examination malpractice and its resulting consequences on our education reflect in the reduction of human resources and the perpetuation of unfairness.
Government and examination regulatory bodies have responded in various ways to this problem, which seems to have been institutionalised. A foremost intervention to promote examination integrity in Nigeria is the 1999 Examination Malpractice Act (Federal Republic of Nigeria [FRN], 1999) which criminalises cheating and specifies jail terms and fines for offenders.
Also, examination regulatory bodies, state ministries of education, and the National Examination Council (NEC) enforce sanctions like blacklisting centres notorious for the ill and cancelling or withholding results of candidates suspected to have engaged in the act. Examination bodies have also been reported to identify and bar offenders from writing the examinations for some years.
Despite these measures, reports of malpractices are replete. A systematic approach to address this situation must be devised. An effective anti-corruption mechanism is needed to tackle the dilemma of examination fraud in Nigeria. No doubt, improving examination integrity will boost the rating of the country’s education sector and advance the competence of human capital.
As the 2022 SSCE commences nationwide, schools, supervisors, and teachers participating in the examination in Rivers State in particular should desist from malpractices or risk appropriate punishment as the state government is allergic to the nuisance. Hence, the exercise should be effectively monitored to stem another round of embarrassing episodes of massive examination misconduct in the state.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics1 day agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics1 day ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics1 day agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
Rivers4 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News1 day agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News4 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics4 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured4 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
