Opinion
Prison Service: Beyond Name Change
Not quite long ago, President Muhammadu Buhari assented to the Nigerian Correctional Service Bill, a bill first presented and read in the Senate in January 2008, precisely 11 years ago, by a former chairman of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba, in the Sixth Assembly.
The president’s signature on this bill, now makes it an act of the parliament and permanently changes the age-long name of the Nigerian Prison Service (NPS) to Nigerian Correctional Service (NCS). A welcome development, isn’t it? But what difference this change of name would make in the management of the prison service in Nigeria, without a corresponding change in the human resources as well as their orientation, has remained a question begging for answers.
Must the role of the prison be highlighted on its name to make it effective? An expert in human sociology and criminology, Dr Kayode Akinleye, toed the writer’s line of thought when he said that by changing the name of the Nigerian Prison Service, “ the FG has ignorantly put the cart before the horse”. This, he said “is akin to organising a naming ceremony for an unborn child”
In as much as a change in name is also of paramount importance in the alteration of a structure, Akinyele is of the view that it should be the last stage of the process and not the starting point.
By the priority placed on changing the Nigerian Prison Service to Nigerian Correctional Service, one is left with an impression that the inability of the NPS to deliver on its original mandate, was tied to its name. How true that may be is yet to be ascertained.
However, from Akinyele’s argument, I guess he must have expected a prioritization of the total reform of the Nigerian Prisons , which would see to proper reorganisation and rearrangement of the prison service without altering the name. After all, the concept of the word ‘prison’ had, from the onset, represented a correctional or remand center.
Yes, the prison is a facility in which inmates are forcibly confined and denied a variety of freedoms under the authority of the constitution, most commonly used within a criminal justice system. It is targetted at education behind bars, reformation and rehabilitation of inmates, changing deviants while having the prisoners’ health in focus.
Arinze Esomnofu in his study on the “role of the Nigerian Prisons Service in prisoners rehabilitation”, said the main aim of establishing the prison institution in all parts of the world, including Nigeria, is to provide a rehabilitation and correctional facility for those who have violated the rules and regulations of their society.
All through the globe, the notion of the prison as a correctional facility is an established one. Nonetheless, the extent to which this maxim is true in practice in Nigeria, may have necessitated the numerous calls for reform in the system for which the Victor Ndoma-Egba sponsored bill was one.
According to Esomnofu, a casual observation of the population that goes in and out of the prisons in Nigeria presupposes that there are some problems in the system. The outcome of Nigerian prisoners upon reintegration into the society, reveals that the prison system in Nigeria has not been able to live up to its expected role of reforming the prisoners to be better than what they were before their imprisonment.
Little wonder Dr Akinyele declared, “It will shock you to note that more than eighty per cent of small-scale criminals who went into Nigerian prisons graduated to large-scale crime by the time they came out of prisons.”
The Nigerian Prisons may have also failed in its duty to rehabilitate the prisoners in order to equip them with new skills or improve on their old ones, and seclude criminals from the rest of the society, pending when they have atoned for their sins. Above all, the level of social decadence in that institution is indeed alarming and unimaginable.
The over congestion of the prisons has invariably rendered the theme of the NPS which is ‘promoting humane condition of imprisonment’, a far cry.
Apart from some aberrational cases in which some authoritarian regimes have had to use the prison as a tool of political repression, on the mere basis of imprisonment policy, the prison service was established to manage criminals in prison yards. This constitutional function empowers the Nigerian prison operatives to; keep convicted offenders (prisoners) for safe custody, keep awaiting trial inmates in custody, until law courts ask for their production.
The fact is that the present state of prisons all over the country urgently requires quick intervention and attention from the government beyond change of name. The neglect on the part of government, coupled with high level of corruption amongst prison officials has rendered prisons across the country ineffective.
While the existing practice in the Nigerian Prison Service falls short of the requirements to correct social vices, it is rather prone to constituting serious danger to the society. It is thus in this light that the writer hails the recent attention drawn to the prisons service in Nigeria. With no thanks though to the change in nomenclature, the totality of the Nigerian Correctional Service Bill smacks of outright overhaul in the country’s prison system.
Be that as it may, we must not rule out the fact that the original system under the aegis of Nigerian Prisons Service came under serious criticism not because the structure was flawed, no!, but because the players in the system compromised the rules. I think that expectation would have been higher had the operatives been considered tools worth overhauling in the first instance.
Howbeit, bearing in mind that education behind bar, whether formal or informal, is key to preparing inmates for life after prison, It is expedient that the bill which is aimed at addressing fundamental lapses inherent in the Prisons Act be highly productive as it appears to have put in place framework that would provide an enabling environment for the rehabilitation and transformation of inmates while also addressing the issue of inadequate funding which had remained the bane of a realistic prison service.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion3 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
-
Featured3 days agoTinubu Jets To S’Arabia For Lesser Hajj …Unveils Free Healthcare For Pensioners
-
News3 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
Police Rescue Woman, 24, From Online Dating Kidnappers … Arrest Five Suspects
-
Featured3 days ago2027: Be Politically Neutral, Fubara Tasks Traditional Rulers
-
News3 days ago
FG Approves King Amachree Airport In Rivers, Sets Conditions For Construction
-
News3 days ago
Lawmaker Sets Sights On Assembly Return …As Mammoth Crowd Grace Flag Handover Rally
