Opinion
‘Operation Sting’ And Rivers Security
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Apart from States in the North-Eastern part of Nigeria that have become synonymous with incessant terrorists’ attacks, Rivers State is one state that has faced major security challenges in recent time, especially in the areas of kidnapping, brutal killings, cultism, armed robbery and community conflicts.
Insecurity, we know, irrespective of the level and nature of manifestation, remains an insidious threat to our individual and collective development and prosperity. The State, of course, is yet to take stock of its social and economic losses as a result of this ugly situation.
This was why when the news of the inauguration of a new security outfit by the Executive Governor of Rivers State, Nyesom Ezenwo Wike, was aired last week, residents of the State felt an air of relief.
Such feeling, I believe, may not have been borne out of any conviction of total suppression of crime in the state, I suppose that people were relieved because a road map towards the eventual suppression of crime in the state had been charted. And for me, it is a renewed effort to stamp out criminality.
At least, it was an indication of His Excellency’s desire and resolve to “effectively tackle both the sources and drivers of insecurity in their diverse criminal manifestations and operations and nip them in their buds”.
This, he confirmed, when he said at the inauguration on Friday that the outfit was a major move to improve the security of lives and property “with the aim of tackling criminal elements and reducing crime and criminality in all parts of the State.”
Actually, Rivers people had contemplated a dawn of a more localized security outfit like such that is obtainable in Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni Local Government Area, ONELGA. It is believed that membership of such localised group would be drawn from among those who have borne the brunt of the criminals’ activities and are more likely to put in their best in the fight against criminality.
For this reason, while some people applaud the initiative as a good one, others are already expressing fears about the security operatives that will be in charge of these assignments, especially the police.
There are, therefore, insinuations that the police will definitely frustrate the effort of the government by turning it into a money-making venture. They call for proper measures to be put in place so as to checkmate the activities of the security operatives on the road if success must be recorded at the end of the day.
On the contrary, the initiative of the state government, irrespective of who steers it, if properly harnessed, has the potential to rout criminality out of existence and create, sustain the right social environment to drive our development.
This is quite possible and achievable if members of the Rivers State security outfit, ‘Operation Sting’, can borrow a leaf from other successful crime-fighting outfits. They can go far if only they can maintain strict facelessness. Original and Special Anti-Robbery Squad succeeded because of its adoption of facelessness and mode of operation.
‘Operation Sting’ members can as well operate in plain clothes, use plain vehicles that cannot be associated with a security or any government agency. Avoidance of unnecessary exposure, yet fully combatant and combat-ready at all times remains a sure way in which the element of surprise is hardly destroyed.
They are to respond instantly to cases as they occur. For it to be effective, it needs to be under someone who will instantly call them out as incidents occur; someone who will monitor and modify their operations as they progress. Such functions can’t be performed by a leader from a distance.
Given the extent of the state government’s commitment to making sure that every nook and cranny of the state is covered by the project, it behoves every hand to be on deck to ensure its workability.
I think that what is important in this regard is the realization of the fact that “Operation Sting is our own specialised and dedicated security initiative, fully funded by the Rivers State Government,” according to the State governor.
Therefore, it must be imprinted in the minds of all the operatives that it is compelling on all to bring all elements of power to bear against every security threat to our state, our persons and our property, hence attempts to deviate from the original concept must be avoided.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
