Opinion
Professorial Glut In Our Varsities
Some decades ago, there was a book titled Diploma Disease in which the author decried and expressed sad concern about human obsession with the acquisition of “paper qualification”. After the “sex-for-mark” scandal in which a professor in a Nigerian university was humiliated and penalized, there is currently a new appellation of “Professors of Otularyngology”. Medical practitioners who specialize in Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) field are known as Otolaryngologists, but mischievous females university students corrupted the spelling thus the appellation of “professors o f Otularyngology”.
The mischief arising from a deliberate mis-spelling of ENT medical specialty is indeed a mockery of the Nigerian academic community. Obviously, university students are in a position to assess and know the quality and peculiarities of various lecturers who teach them. But they are not involved in the process of assessment of lecturers for promotion, which should have produced a salutary effect on the attitude of lecturers towards students. Rather, what counts in the elevation of academic staff of universities to the highest rank miss out what should have been most vital.
There is an academic policy of “publish-or-perish,” whereby promotion is based on the number of papers or articles published in learned journals by lecturers as criteria for promotion. Human beings, in their cleverness, usually look out for the lines of least resistance as a means of showing off their prowess. A predatory propensity would always prey on weak species rather than take on a Titan in a combat of valour.
When it comes to economic survival strategies humans exhibit their best abilities and wit in the rat race to excel. When colonial administration in Nigeria’s education system introduced a policy of payment of grants based on performance or results of students, teachers and heads of schools helped their students to have excellent performance. Such excellent results meant more money for such schools as grants, but that also produced the phenomenon of examination malpractice.
In the case of public universities in Nigeria, the policy of retirement of professors at the age of 70, and with their full salary as pension, produced some sad results. First of all, there is a rat race to become a professor by means of fast wit. There is also the out-witting of official records with respect to the change of date of birth which would be followed by the use of hair-dye. Since publishing of papers in learned journals is the magic wand to professorship, what goes on in this respect demonstrates most clearly the Nigerian spirit of survival by wit. From plagiarism to other forms of academic malfeasanece, lecturers are known to pay more attention to promotions than they do to the up-building and well-being of the students they teach.
The few old-fashioned and professional-minded ones who do not join in the professional rat race are fading away from the universities. The pity is that the nations’ reward system encourages the on-going rat race and “carry-go” culture. The harms which “paper qualification” syndrome and the unethical means of getting to the top have done to this country must not be allowed to continue. There is a serious slur in the nation’s image.
For an academic department with a total student population of less than 90 to have 27 professors would mean that there is a professorial glut. The phenomenon of glut occurs when there is a superfluity of supply or production of a commodity such that the value or relevance of such commodity becomes undermined. This sorry state in Nigerian universities is demonstrated by the kind of gossips and sad comments which students make about some of their lecturers. When a student can say: “professor my ass”, then it is time to ask why this is so. A mockery!
The School of Oriental and African Studies of the University of London, with thousands of students from all over the globe, had about 13 professors a few years ago, apart from visiting ones. But here in Nigeria, professorship has become a reflection of the nation’s political system where anything can be cooked up and doctored, with a resultant distortion of value and credibility.
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer at the Rivers State University, PH.
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Rivers2 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News5 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
