Opinion
Still On Building Collapse
Reports have it that the federal government on Tuesday inaugurated an inter-ministerial committee to investigate the causes of building collapse in the country with a view to arresting it.
The Minister of Science and Technology, Dr. Ogbonnaya Onu, who inaugurated the committee, said the Federal Government was deeply concerned about the incessant cases of building collapse in the country and its attendant implications. He recalled many painful stories of building collapse across the country, and assured that the administration would do everything possible to stop building collapse because of its toll on human life.
How thoughtful of the government to want to put an end to the calamity that incessantly befalls the nation. I mean, cases of building collapse in different parts of the country in the past years have become so rampant that some people are becoming apprehensive that Nigeria will soon add “building collapse capital of the world” to her numerous shameful and embarrassing “achievements”.
What is not clear, however, is how the report to be submitted by this new committee will be so different from those of previous committees that it will be a panacea to the issue of building collapse in the nation. One can hardly recall any building collapse in the past that did not generate an investigative committee.
In 2014 after the collapse of a building at the Synagogue Church of All Nations, Lagos State, which killed over 100 persons, mostly South Africans, a Coroner’s inquest was instituted which indicted the church and the contractors of the building. Subsequently, the Lagos State Government filed 111 counts against the Registered Trustees of the church and four others, including Hardrock Construction and Engineering Company; Jandy Trust Limited; and Engineers Oladele Ogundeji and Akinbela Fatiregun, who built the collapsed building. Till today, the case is still ongoing.
Similarly, the Lekki building collapse of 2016, the Umuahia building collapse of 2013, the Ikoli Street, Garki, Abuja building collapse of 2010, those that happened in Port Harcourt, Kaduna, Jos and other parts of the country attracted the condemnation of those in authority who most of time set up committees to ascertain causes of the collapse, promising to sanction those found guilty. Hardly do we hear the outcome of the investigation or see anyone punished for that offence.
So the inter-ministerial committee should first all beam its searchlight on government to find out how those in government have contributed towards the reoccurring tragedy. To what extent have they compromised or delayed in taking action that could have prevented the series of building collapse that had sent many Nigerians to their early grave? Preliminary reports on some of the building collapses had always pointed at structural defect, substandard building materials, non adherence to international building rules, and lack of adequate supervision as some of the reasons for the collapse. Can those in government exonerate themselves from these?
So, instead of probably focusing on the contractors, the site engineers and other site workers or even the property owners who wouldn’t pull down the marked structures as at when due, we should also look at those in authority who take bribe and other forms of gratification and fail to do their jobs diligently.
So, one will align with the school of thought that says corruption is the root cause of the calamity that has befallen the nation for over four decades. However, the contractors, masons, engineers and others directly involved in building construction do not live in isolation. They exist in the same country where the members of the judiciary, the legislature and the executive arm of government are corrupt, where unprecedented corruption goes on in the health, education and other sectors. They are in public service for themselves not for country. Public servants and those in the private sector loot; even the Nigerian police in charge of internal security are adjudged the worst in the globe due to corruption and other factors. The love of money is the in-thing and you can acquire it however you want. Corruption pays handsomely in the country at no cost to the perpetrators.
The worst is that we keep paying lip service to the fight against corruption. Recently the National Chairman of the ruling All Progressive Congress (APC), Adams Oshiomhole, told members of the opposition party to join APC so that their sins will be forgiven. That invariably means that if you belong to the ruling party you are a saint if not you are a sinner. How can we eliminate corruption in the country with this type of notion?
So, to rid the nation of building collapse and other problems hindering development and progress of the nation, concrete action must be taken by all to fight the monster called corruption. The fight must be holistic and sincere, otherwise we will keep beating around the bush.
Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
