Opinion
A Reflection Of 2019 Elections
The 2019 general elections are just around the corner. In Nigerian politics, it means different thing to different people. Nigerians either expect a new administration or continue with the current one.
If Nigerians expect the current regime to return, it may be an indication that the government has performed well. In that case, such achievements of the government will be evident for all to see and not by propaganda.
However, given the high level of deceit and propaganda by Nigerian governments, the people can hardly assess a regime to know whether it deserves a second tenure or not. But by right it is not supposed to be so. With or without propaganda, Nigerians should be in a position to assess their governments and return them or vote them out. Unfortunately, the present administration in the country is guilty of this.
President Muhammadu Buhari’s government has indulged severally in trying to convince the people that all is well. Rather than address real issues of development, the government uses propaganda to showcase phantom achievements and successes to Nigerians.
At other times, the government chooses to indulge in propaganda against perceived enemies, whom they accuse of being responsible for their failure in governance.
Rather than be concerned with governance as they promised in their campaigns in 2015, they have resorted to blame game. They hold the opposition responsible for their woes and pitfalls.
For the opposition, it is a time to work harder to wrestle power from the incumbent. Wrestling power from the incumbent means doing everything possible legally to take over the reigns of leadership in the next year’s election.
As 2019 approaches, let the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) truly discover the cause of their failure in the last general election. If the incumbent came into power by rigging, the PDP have to ensure that this time around it doesn’t work.
The ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), should never pride itself of being in charge. It should know that the incumbency factor will not give them victory this time because they know that they have not done well.
As the countdown to 2019 continues, the ruling party is showing more desperations despite their claims of anticipated victory and a reassuring mien. They say they are on top of the situation while in actual fact they are under the situation.
Besides the uncertainty that comes with the 2019 election, another source of acute anxiety is what Nigerians refer to as “second tenure woes”. They believe a regime that performed badly in the first tenure will do even worse in the second tenure. Such is the phobia they have for the present government should it return next year.
Second tenure in Nigeria has become a problem. Since 1999, it has been proved that first tenure chief executives hardly disclose their real intentions for governance. It is when they are re-elected that they carry out unpopular programmes and damn the consequences.
Arguably, I think many first tenure chief executives hardly execute projects until they get to their second tenure. The ones that carry out undertakings during their first tenures use their re-election to recoup their electioneering spendings.
The truth is that in Nigerian politics, the people don’t matter. What matters is their pocket or the money they will make from office. Since the people are not important, they are simply consigned to hell.
So, as 2019 draws closer, the people, both at the federal and State levels, are becoming more and more skeptical about what the election holds for them. Is it going to be a second tenure of an APC government of woes as usual or an entirely new government of hope? This is for them to decide.
Nigerians must be very wary and choose wisely. We must have in mind that this democracy cost us so much. Therefore, it shouldn’t be given to those who would trample upon it like dogs and destroy it.
Soibi Max-Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Rivers2 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News5 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
