Connect with us

Politics

Group Causions On Technology Application In Elections

Published

on

Youth Initiatives for Advocacy, Growth and Advancement (YIAGA), a civil society organisation has urged the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to tread slowly on technology application in electoral process.
The Executive Director of the group, Mr Samson Itodo, in a document released in Abuja, said because of its “limitations and vulnerability” technology could not guarantee credible elections.
According to Itodo, by all standards, elections are complex and capital-intensive because electoral operations, procurement, staff training and remuneration and public outreach gulp huge amounts of the election budget.
He said that the poor state of public infrastructure, including roads, institutions, energy, environment and ICT penetration, contributed to high electoral costs.
Itodo said though a plausible argument, high cost of elections in Africa was the consequence for undemocratic and flawed elections recorded on the continent.
“Simply put, countries are spending more on elections due to low level of electoral integrity hence the reliance on technology to eliminate all forms of electoral heist and irregularity.
“It is common practice for election management bodies in Africa to leverage on technology for voter registration, voter identification or accreditation, electronic tallying and transmission of results.”
He said that different election stakeholders such as companies, civil society groups, politicians and development partners, subject electoral commissions in Africa to intense pressure to deploy new technologies for elections.
The director said that most of the commissions yielded to these pressures without undertaking a cost-benefit analysis on the deployment of electoral technologies or its potency to guarantee credible elections.
According to him, in this era of automation, machine learning and artificial intelligence, it is foolhardy to ignore adaptation of relevant technologies and digitized electoral processes.
He said that unarguably, technology deployed for elections could eliminate human errors associated with calculating and computing of results, improve voter identification, facilitate faster and easier voting, but could lack integrity.
“Although electoral technology can enhance and undermine electoral integrity, electoral commissions must be conscious of its limitations and vulnerabilities that can also undermine it.
“The debate on whether electoral technology can guarantee electoral integrity is premised on the limitations of technology deployment in Africa.
“Experience shows that electoral technology is vulnerable to failure, interference, and security breaches.
“Recent reports of cyber propaganda, warfare and election interference strengthen the argument that electoral technology can potentially de-legitimise elections.”
Itodo pointed out that without checks and oversight, heads of ICT departments in electoral commissions could become kingmakers by subverting the will of the people through a ‘click’ resulting to computer-generated leaders.
He said that there were growing apprehension and suspicion with the deployment of technology in electoral processes in Africa, adding that most people did not trust electoral technology due to its limitations.
He said that in Kenya, Raila Odinga alleged system logs on the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC), suggesting possible infiltration of the commission’s electronic system of tallying of results.
Itodo added that the then opposition Sierra Leone Peoples Party (SLPP) was similarly accused of hacking into the system of the National Electoral Commission (NEC) to alter election results.
He, however, advised electoral commissions to secure public consent and approval in their quest to deploy technology for elections, saying that it would boost citizens’ trust in the process thereby deepening electoral integrity.

Continue Reading

Politics

CSO Seeks Review Of Judgment Sacking Zamfara Rep For Joining APC

Published

on

A coalition of civil society organisations has called for a review of the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which sacked Hon. Abubakar Gummi, the lawmaker representing Gummi/Bukkuyum Federal Constituency of Zamfara State, for defecting from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Operating under the umbrella of the Coalition of Civil Society Network, the group described the ruling delivered by Justice Obiora Egwuatu as unfair and contrary to the spirit of democracy, urging the judiciary to consider the will of the people in its final determination of the matter.

Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, had on Thursday, October 30, sacked Gummi for defecting from the PDP, which sponsored his election, to the APC.

In his ruling, Justice Egwuatu held that it was morally wrong for a politician to transfer votes from one political party to another, stating that “political prostitution must not be rewarded.”

He declared that voters elect candidates based on the manifestos and ideals of their political parties. Therefore, it was both legally and morally unacceptable for an elected official to abandon that platform without relinquishing the mandate.

The court also restrained the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, from recognising Hon. Gummi as a member of the House, and ordered him to refund all salaries and allowances received from October 30, 2024, to the date of judgment.

Justice Egwuatu further directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct a fresh election within 30 days to fill the vacant seat.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1803/2024, was filed by the PDP and its Zamfara State chairman, Jamilu Jibomagayaki, who argued that Hon. Gummi’s defection violated Section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as there was no division within the PDP to justify his action.

But convener of the coalition, Lukman Muhammad, who addressed journalists at a press conference in Abuja on Saturday, said Hon. Gummi’s defection was a direct result of the unresolved internal crisis within the PDP, which, according to him, crippled the lawmaker’s ability to effectively represent his constituents.

He said: “We believe the court’s decision was unjust and failed to consider the circumstances surrounding Hon. Gummi’s defection. Gummi’s decision to join the APC was necessitated by the unresolved internal crisis within the PDP, which hindered his ability to effectively represent his constituents.

“We affirm that Hon. Gummi’s right to choose his political affiliation is protected by the Constitution and should be respected. We stand for democracy and the rule of law, while also urging the judiciary to consider the will of the people and the greater good”.

He urged Justice Egwuatu to review the judgment, stressing that the ruling could set a dangerous precedent that undermines the principle of fair representation and the rights of elected officials.

The coalition further noted that the judgment has broader implications for Nigeria’s democratic process, as it raises questions about the extent to which lawmakers can exercise their constitutional freedom of association without fear of losing their mandate.

Continue Reading

Politics

PDP, NNPP, Others Blame Tinubu For Defections To APC 

Published

on

Opposition parties have accused President Bola Tinubu of using public resources and anti-graft agencies to pressure opposition members into joining the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The parties stated that the APC was on the verge of collapse following the recent wave of defections from opposition parties into its ranks.

In separate interviews with The Tide source, spokespersons for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), and the Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP) —Debo Ologunagba, Oladipo Johnson, and Mark Adebayo – respectively, said an implosion was imminent in the APC.

But the APC Director of Publicity, Bala Ibrahim, stated that recent defections to the party were voluntary and inspired by the ruling party’s achievements, not through coercion. He added that the APC was well-structured, capable of managing its internal affairs effectively, and therefore would not experience any internal crisis.

In recent months, the ruling APC has continued to receive several high-profile politicians from opposition parties, particularly the PDP. Among those who have joined the APC are Akwa Ibom State Governor, Umo Eno, Delta State Governor, Sheriff Oborevwori, and the PDP’s 2023 vice-presidential candidate, Ifeanyi Okowa.

Most recently, members of the Enugu State Executive Council defected to the APC, a move followed by Governor Peter Mbah’s official declaration for the ruling party on October 14 in Enugu.

On October 15, Bayelsa State Governor, Douye Diri, announced his resignation from the PDP. Although he has yet to join another party, speculation is rife that he is on his way to the APC.

Similarly, Taraba State Governor, Agbu Kefas, confirmed last Wednesday that he would be joining the APC.

Numerous other politicians, including several lawmakers, have also abandoned their parties to align with the ruling APC.

In his reaction, Hon. Ologunagba predicted an imminent crisis within the APC, expressing confidence that those who defected would eventually return to the PDP.

He stated, “This is the major political party (PDP), and it is the only democratic party in the country. It has structures cutting across all the local governments, all the wards, and of course all the states. In every home, there are members of the PDP, and that is why the APC are jittery, and that is why they are coercing our members, using state resources and state agencies to force members of opposition parties to join the ruling party.

“But in all this, we are sure and confident that very soon, the APC will implode because it is a multipurpose political vehicle that is not going to last. It is going to implode.

“Many Nigerians will see through it and know that the party is not a political party that protects the interests of the citizens. So, they are going to leave the party and move to the major political party, which is the PDP. We are optimistic that before 2027, many Nigerians will join us because this is the truly democratic party and the only party that is out there to protect their interests.”

On his part, Mr Johnson of the NNPP lamented that the wave of defections posed a serious threat to the country’s democracy.

Mr Johnson said, “This is bad for democracy. For our type of democracy, it is important to have a proper and effective opposition. Already, we’ve seen a blurring of lines between the legislature and the executive; some would even say the judiciary. I hope not. I think many people are observing the trend and are unhappy. However, we need to be a bit more patient and see what happens soon.

“When the PDP was in power for 16 years, it was the party many people rushed into. Over time, it imploded, and many of those who joined it turned against it. So, I see that happening to the ruling APC. Definitely. This is because of the nature of Nigerian politicians; many are driven by personal interests. I always say that Nigeria can never truly be a one-party state. Even if only one party exists, it will become factionalised, with different interests and power blocs. Those pushing the country toward a one-party system may not have studied Nigeria’s political history carefully.”

In his remarks, CUPP’s Adebayo stated that the pattern of defections among politicians, particularly governors and lawmakers, was a deliberate strategy by the ruling party to transform the country into a one-party state.

Mr Adebayo said, “It is not accidental; it is a deliberate and strategic effort to entrench a one-party dictatorship. Whether these defections are forced or coerced, one thing is clear: it is an intentional action driven by the ruling party, particularly the President.

“This development is unhealthy for our democracy. It is shameful and stands against everything democratic principles represent. It is inimical to the growth and development of Nigeria as a democratic nation and poses a grave threat to our political stability.

“The implosion of the APC will come before or once it loses power. Most Nigerian politicians lack ideological grounding or principles; their loyalty lies only with the party in power. Political affiliation is tied to ideology and conviction, not convenience. However, the ideology of most politicians is simply the ruling party. If tomorrow the ADC, Labour Party, or SDP wins the presidency, many of these same politicians will abandon the APC overnight. They have no shame, no conviction, and no conscience. Their only motivation is proximity to power.”

In response, Mr Ibrahim of the APC maintained the APC would not face any internal crisis, asserting that it has the capacity to effectively manage its affairs, unlike the opposition.

He stated, “The fact that the opposition are not organised and they cannot organise primaries, neither can they manage their parties, does not mean we are on the same boat with them. Our party, the APC, has been conducting primaries successfully and rancor-free.

“So, the fact that they don’t know how to manage their party does not mean that is the way we run our own party. The APC does not coerce anyone to join. Those joining are doing so willingly because of President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope achievements. Our party is fully prepared. It’s not going to implode; it’s not going to have any issues similar to the issues they have been having.”

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Ndume Blames FG, Senate For Nigeria’s ‘Country Of Particular Concern’ Designation By Trump

Published

on

Former Senate Chief Whip and current Senator representing Borno South, Ali Ndume, has blamed the President Bola Tinubu’s administration and the Senate for the tagging of Nigeria by the United States President, Donald Trump, as ‘Country of Particular Concern’.

Senator Ndume, in a statement on Saturday in Abuja, accused both the executive and legislative arms of complacency, saying their failure to proactively engage the United States government on the alleged persecution of Christians in Nigeria led to the development.

The senator recalled that he had earlier sponsored a motion in the Senate on “Christian genocide” in the country. The motion, he said, led to resolutions mandating the Nigerian government to engage the U.S. with verified facts and figures.

President Trump, last Friday, announced the designation of Nigeria as a ‘Country of Particular Concern’ over alleged persecution of Christians.

President Trump made the announcement via a post on his Truth Social platform, which was also shared on the official White House X handle.

“Thousands of Christians are being killed. Radical Islamists are responsible for this mass slaughter,” President Trump wrote.

But the Nigerian government swiftly rejected the claims, insisting that President Trump’s assessment did not reflect the true situation in the country.

However, Senator Ndume accused the President Tinubu’s administration and the Senate of treating the allegation raised by US lawmaker, Riley Moore, with complacency, prior to President Trump’s declaration, and urged the federal government to take urgent steps to engage the US government with facts and figures on the activities of terrorists organisations which, he noted, were blind to faith.

“I have alerted the government, I even moved a motion. Nigeria is a sovereign state, it isn’t about what the United States can do to us, but about the misconception and the ripple effects of classifying us as a country of concern.

“We should engage the American government by presenting facts and figures. By engaging the US government, we should demand that they hear the other side of the story from the Nigerian government and the Muslim community. Muslims have been killed too. The genocide isn’t against Christians but Nigerians generally,” he said.

 

Continue Reading

Trending