Opinion
The Unkept Promises
Time was when keeping your word held special significance. People took great pride in being of good character. Personal integrity was valued. It was a period when good moral was instilled in children at very early age and was viewed as instrumental in achieving success.
Today, not many care about these values. Lying, dishonesty, insincerity are the order of the day. People make promises and do not bother to keep them. Yes, we all fail to keep our promises sometimes, but some of us seem to have a problem keeping most of their promises. Politicians fall under this category.
Every politician knows that the key to winning election is to make great promises. During campaigns, they promise to cure the ills of society including fighting corruption, developing all the sectors, guaranteeing the security of the lives of the citizens and many more. At all levels of government – local, state, federal, the story is the same.
There is no need detailing the many broken campaign promises in the history of Nigeria. However, permit me to mention two of such promises by the current administration. Here they are: “We intend for instance, to bring back our National Carrier, the Nigerian Airways. We shall do this by bringing all the aircraft in the presidential fleet into the Nigerian Airways and within a year increase the fleet into about 20” – Muhammadu Buhari (Feb 2015, while addressing Nigerians in UK);
Another one: “A serious government will fix power problem in six months” – Babatunde Raji Fashola (Nov 12, 2014).
There are many more of such promises.
The big questions are, have these promises been fulfilled? We are almost three years into the life of the current administration where incidentally, Fashola is the Minister for Power, Works and Housing. Can it really be said that power issues in the country have been fixed or is this government “not a serious one”?
Just four days ago, Nigeria was ranked the 2017 second worst electricity supply nation in the world. According to a report released by Spectator Index, of the 137 countries examined in the report, Yemen ranked the worst electricity supply nation in 2017, followed by Nigeria, Haiti, Lebanon and Malawi.
Is it not baffling that despite all the huge resources invested in the power sector every year by both current and previous administrations, power supply in the country keeps getting worse? Even the privatization of the power sector has not brought any succour. All we hear are claims upon claims of significant progress in the power sector, yet the reality on ground says otherwise.
An African Progress Report recently disclosed that more than 90 million Nigerians have no access to electricity. It says, out of this non-electrified population, 17 million people live in the urban centers, while 73 million live in rural areas. How do we expect our economy to grow in this circumstance?
Electricity is pivotal to the development of any nation, but when almost half of the population have no access to electricity, how can the economy thrive? People rely on power generating sets for their commercial and domestic power supply which is even now becoming out of reach for many Nigerians.
Affirming the decay nature of the nation’s power sector, President Muhammadu Buhari, in his inaugural speech on May 29, 2015, said: “No single cause can be identified to explain Nigerian’s poor economic performance over the years than the power situation. It is a national shame that an economy of 180 million generates only 4,000 megawatts and distributes even less.
“Continuous tinkering with the structures of power supply and distribution and close to 20 billion dollars expended since 1999 has only brought darkness, frustration, misery and resignation among Nigerians.
“We will not allow this to go on; careful studies are under way during this transition to identify the quickest, safest and most cost-effective way to bring light and relief to Nigerians.’’
Almost three years down the road, Nigerians are still waiting.
Meanwhile the promise to revive the Nigeria Airways has remained only on the pages of the newspapers. No action whatsoever has been seen to be taken in that direction nor has reasonable attention been paid to the aviation sector of the economy.
Not too long ago, two Nigerian airports – Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos and Port Harcourt International Airport, Omagwa, were ranked among the worst airports in the world. Observers have said that going by the poor state of infrastructure in these and other airports in the country, the poor customer relation of most airport staff and the filthy environment, they couldn’t have expected a better result.
In the education sector, health and virtually all the sectors, the situation is the same – poor attention. Let us not go to the issue of insecurity particularly cattle herdsmen menace which seems to have overwhelmed those in authority. Many Nigerians are killed almost daily by the herders, yet, no concrete step has been taken to punish the offenders or find an agreeable permanent solution to the crisis. Meanwhile, Nigerians were promised adequate protection of their lives and properties.
Therefore, one thinks it is high time our leaders matched their words with action. The poor rankings of Nigerian universities, Nigerian Police and others are indications that the government should do much more than it is doing. Let us begin to see the fulfillment of all the lofty promises. Yes, we know that sometimes, after making promises, there could be unforeseen circumstances posing a challenge to their fulfillment, but let us see some efforts towards keeping these words.
Another election year is approaching and politicians have started making another round of empty promises. While members of the opposition parties are promising heaven and earth if they are voted into power, those of the ruling parties are making more promises even when they have not kept the ones they made three year ago. Let us not be swayed by the politicians’ antics and be carried away by mass delusion of inflated expectations. We should rather be able to read in-between the lines and elect the best candidates who will genuinely work for the good of the country and the citizens not those that will renege on their promises and leave the people to suffer and die of hardship.
Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
