Opinion
A Vote For Restructuring
The numerous calls by some Nigerians for a restructuring of the federation have generated great concerns and heated debates among analysts and pundits. Many states which derive greater percentage of their sustainability from the federation account have been quick to express their dissenting views. Their fears stem from the economic uncertainty of their states should such calls be heeded to.
Before the current agitations, the Niger Delta region had long made a case in this direction. However, their agitation for the control of their resources followed complete neglect by the Federal Government.
Their hue and cry failed to earn the sympathy of those who manage the resources. This is because the managers have tested the honey and cannot let it go, or they absolutely love to reap where they did not so. Unfortunately, the proceeds from resources in the Niger Delta is used to develop other parts of the country while the oil rich area remains underdeveloped and impoverished.
Apparently, with the incessant calls from different quarters for a restructuring under the aegis of “return to regionalism”, “independent, self-sustaining federating units”, or “restoration of federalism”, it is obvious that the system of governance practiced in Nigeria has outlived its usefulness and like every expired product, its continuous usage portends danger.
There is no gainsaying the fact that the excessive concentration of power at the centre in our brand of federalism is the reason behind the present woes of the country. That is why the former Vice –President of Nigeria, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, after a thorough diagnosis of the Nigerian situation, ended up advocating a true fiscal federalism for Nigeria.
To Abubakar, the system this country presently operates, no doubt, is incapable of guaranteeing her eventual growth. Little wonder, he said, “our current structure and the practices it has encouraged have been a major impediment to the economic and political development of our country. It has not served Nigeria well, and at the risk of reproach, it has not served the north well”.
The truth is that the system has not served the country well. No doubt, many states have benefited from the wealth of others, yet the owners of such wealth have nothing to show for it. Restructuring will make a way forward for our great nation. It will help Nigeria rediscover itself for self-development. This is achievable.
Nations evolve on the basis of creative thinking and rethinking. Even though in Nigeria we inherited a skewed federal arrangement from the colonial masters, we ought to have learnt our lessons through the hard way and have a rethink.
A former Head of State, General Ibrahim Babangida (rtd), advised that if we have repeatedly done certain things and not getting the desired result, then we need to change tactics and approach. Nigeria at the moment is in dare need of a “re-set, a re-thinking and a redesign”.
This must not be mistaken for a call for disintegration. No! Neither does it in any way threaten the unity of the nation. But the beauty of unity in diversity is conspicuous when the federating units oversee their affairs.
Again, in the words of General Ibrahim Babangida (rtd), “the Nigerian federation , as currently structured, is in need of reforms that will emphasise the individual strength and advantages of the component units so that governments can really work to improve the lives of Nigerians”.
I agree with those kind words of Gen. Babangida. To save Nigeria from eventual collapse, the country has to be restructured by reverting to true federalism. This is not only about political restructuring . It is also about the enthronement of fiscal federalism. Diversification of the economy is good, but restructuring will give a firm standing to the nation.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
