Politics
Still On Diaspora Voting And Rivers Rerun Polls
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had a somewhat bitter, sweet engagement with the National Assembly recently.
The issues bordered on the much-debated diaspora voting and pending elections into vacant legislative seats. Clearly both issues touch on constitution.
While the law as constituted does not allow for electronic voting as such voting must be by personal representation, the constitution provides that every constituency must have a representative through an elective process organized by the electoral commission. However it would seem that the commission is almost handicapped on both issues.
The 2015 general election was perhaps the most competitive election in the Nigeria’s recent political history.
Invariably, that electoral process opened up the system to the exploration of more technology with the introduction of the Smart Card Reader and Permanent Voter Card (PVC).
As such, in the build up to that election, the clamour by Nigerians living abroad to get involved in the process back home became much more noticeable.
For them, besides technology conquering the geographical hindrance to voting for any citizen (as evident in even small countries in Africa), the appreciable economic contributions they make through transfers back home warrants they have a direct participation in electoral process in the country.
According to a report by World Bank’s Migration and Remittances Factbook 2016, remittances from Nigerians living abroad hit $20.77 billion in 2015, making Nigeria the sixth largest recipient of remittances in the world.
It further revealed that remittances to Nigeria rose every year over the last decade from $16.93 billion in 2006 to $20.83 billion in 2014. In 2015, however, remittances fell slightly to $20.77 billion.
According to the report, the top two sources for Nigerian diaspora remittances in 2015 were the United States ($5.7 billion) and the United Kingdom ($3.7 billion).
More so, the report showed that Nigeria tops the top ten remittance recipients in Africa by $20.77bn, followed by Ghana ($2.0bn), Senegal ($1.6bn), Kenya ($1.6bn), South Africa ($1.0bn), Uganda ($0.9bn), Mali ($0.9bn), Ethiopia ($0.6bn), Liberia ($0.5bn), and Sudan ($0.5bn).
But, attempts at addressing diaspora voting has never gone beyond the discussion stage. The issue was deliberated at the 2014 National Conference. Former External Affairs Minister, Prof. Ibrahim Gambari, had at the confab, captured the frustrations of millions of Nigerians abroad about their inability to vote.
Expectedly, he blamed the situation on the provision of the relevant sections of the Electoral Act and the Constitution of the Federal Republic, which discriminated against Nigerians living outside the country.
Despite the major leaps recorded by the immediate past leadership of INEC, diaspora voting wasn’t feasible for the 2015 election. With federal lawmakers fixated on returning to office, amending the constitution to accommodate Nigerians abroad was not a priority.
But, this INEC, under Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, seems poised to address the issue, provided the National Assembly plays its part.
This much the chief electoral officer stated when he hosted members of the Senate Committee on Diaspora and Non-Governmental Organizations, led by its Chairperson, Dr. Rose Oko, when they visited the Commission’s headquarters in Abuja.
He urged the National Assembly to expedite action by amending sections of the Constitution and the Electoral Act (2010 as amended) to make way for Nigerians living outside the country to participate in the electoral process and vote.
He said: “INEC believes that Nigerians living outside the country should have the right to vote for a variety of reasons: they are citizens of Nigeria interested in the affairs of their own country; they make considerable contribution to the economy through huge financial inflow to the country; there is a sizable amount of Nigerian citizens living outside the country; and Diaspora voting is consistent with global best practices”.
Professor Yakubu noted that: “Allowing Nigerians living abroad to vote will allow Nigerians in Diaspora to register and vote in their countries of residence”.
He however pointed out that: “for this to happen, several sections of the Constitution and the Electoral Act have to be amended to provide for the legal framework to allow for registration and voting by citizens living in the Diaspora”.
He disclosed that the Commission had identified areas of the Constitution and the Electoral Act which needed amendment and was willing to discuss it with the Committee. He assured that: “INEC is committed to providing Nigerians living outside the country the opportunity to have a say in who become our leaders at various levels”.
“I hope that arising from our interactions today, the legal and constitutional obstacles to voting by Nigerians in Diaspora will soon be removed so that Nigerians, irrespective of where they live around the world would have the opportunity to vote in future elections, but the first step towards actualizing that possibility rests entirely on the national assembly because you are the only people who have the powers to amend our constitution and laws,” he said.
Earlier, the Chairperson, Senate Committee on Diaspora and Non-Governmental Organizations, Senator Rose Oko, had told the leadership of INEC that members of the Committee were in the Commission in respect of the quest for Nigerians in Diaspora to be part of the electoral process and to exercise their franchise.
Senator Oko, advised the Commission to look into the possibility of including Nigerians in Disapora to vote, and assured that the Committee would do everything possible to facilitate the amendment of the relevant sections of the Electoral Act to accommodate people living outside the country in the electoral process.
“We in the Senate Committee do believe that we would lend our voice very strongly to the call that Nigerians in Diaspora should be given an opportunity to exercise their franchise to vote in the countries where they are domiciled for a number of reasons,” she said.
By and large, according to analysts, the bulk of the responsibility lies with legislature. Nevertheless, while the National Assembly and the commission enthuse over the prospects of Nigerians in diaspora voting, the need to tidy up what has become perennial logistics challenges back home, would be key.
Also, the challenge of inconclusive elections, resulting majorly from insecurity, might be too much of a distraction for the commission. Still, other analysts believe that these challenges are easily surmountable, if key stakeholders play their statutory role.
Although President Muhammadu Buhari seems indifferent to the 2014 confab report which gave life to the prospects of diaspora voting, he has often expressed willingness to make Nigerians living abroad have a direct say in how their leaders emerge.
In March, while speaking to the Nigerian community in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea, he had said: “The Independent National Electoral Commission will be encouraged to explore the possibility of Nigerians abroad voting in the 2019 general elections. We will do all within our means to fulfill that desire.
“I want all Nigerians to know that I respect them and their right to choose their leaders. Some African countries have started allowing their citizens resident abroad to vote in national elections, so I fully empathise with the desire of Nigerians in the diaspora to vote in national elections,” the President stated.
His optimism in Malabo was slight variance from his rather cautious desire in August 2015, where he stated that it was not feasible to implement the idea presently as there were still many factors militating against its realisation.
Speaking at the 2015 Diaspora Day held at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, with the theme “Diaspora and Nigeria Change Agenda”, he identified some of those factors, which he argued were logistical, to include legislation, huge finance, and confidence in the electoral system.
The Senate President, Sen Bukola Saraki, had also expressed the upper chamber’s commitment as well.
Speaking at the one-day stakeholders meeting on electoral reforms organized by Senate Committee and Policy and Legal Advocacy Center (PLAC), Saraki had said the wish of Nigerians living abroad to participate in the process should be accommodated.
However, while the next round of legislative elections are months away, and with the Sen Ken Nnamani Electoral Reform Committee set to commence work, it is expected that diaspora voting would get serious attention this time.
However, while the electoral commission tasked the National Assembly on ensuring that Nigerians living abroad can vote in future polls, the federal legislature was not so charitable over its criticism of INEC for delays in conducting pending elections into legislative seats.
Both chambers had come down hard on the commission over pending polls, especially in Rivers and Lagos.
While the House of Representatives urged INEC to conduct the elections, Senate threatened to suspend plenary sessions if the electoral umpire fails to conduct all pending re-run elections into legislative positions in Rivers State.
This followed the unanimous adoption of a motion under matters of urgent public importance sponsored by Deputy President of the Senate, Senator Ike Ekweremadu, (PDP) and Senate Leader, Senator Mohammed Ali Ndume, (APC).
In the House, the Minority Leader, Hon. Leo Ogor, (PDP) had sponsored the motion and the Majority Leader, Femi Gbajabiamila (APC) had supported the motion.
Besides the bi-partisan party support that greeted the motion, the National Assembly found inexplicable that those pending elections has not be held, months after court rulings.
They cited breach to the constitution on the part of INEC, which touched on disobeying court ruling on time frame for rerun election, causing under representation of a people, which they say poses danger to democracy.
But INEC has often stated that its inability to conduct the polls bother on insecurity in those areas. Before then, the commission had early this year, said it would not go back to states where it had pending legislative reruns until stakeholders in those areas commit to the safety of electoral personnel and materials.
The commission had lost an ad-hoc staff and serving National Youth Corps member due to violence in Rivers State. However after much agitation, the commission had held a had meeting with stakeholders from Kogi, Anambra, Rivers and Imo State where legislative elections were pending.
For Rivers State, series of peace meetings were held. Governor Nyesom Wike and his immediate predecessor and Minister of transportation, Rotimi Amaechi had met with the heads of security agencies including the DSS and police as a way of deescalating the tension in the state. The two estranged political allies are the leaders of the two major parties in the state, PDP and APC.
However while the elections in Kogi and Imo held, that of Rivers did not hold due to resurgence of violence.
But during the debate on his motion on the floor of the Senate, Sen. Ekweremadu argued “that lNEC had successfully conducted elections in the North-East of Nigeria, especially in the areas around Sambisa Forest, in spite of the area having been acknowledged worldwide to be ravaged by terrorist activities.
“Also aware that INEC recently conducted successful elections in Edo State even after security advice from Police and DSS forced a rescheduling of the election date.
Ukaibe is a public affairs analyst.
Politics
Senate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill
The Senate has defended the passage of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) (State Police) Bill, 2026, saying the proposed creation of state police is driven by national consensus and the country’s security needs rather than political considerations.
The Red Chamber passed the bill last Wednesday after more than two-thirds of senators voted in support.
In a statement issued yesterday by the Directorate of Media and Public Affairs, Office of the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele described the bill as “a child of necessity and not of political expediency as well as a product of national consensus and not of cynicism.”
The senate leader said the proposal to establish state police was a matter of urgent public importance that could not be delayed because of political interests, given the country’s security challenges.
He explained that the proposal did not originate recently but emerged from memoranda submitted to the Senate Ad-hoc Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.
According to him, the proposal underwent extensive consultations and rigorous scrutiny because of its sensitive nature.
Bamidele said the National Assembly consulted widely with the Executive, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria, the leadership of the Nigeria Police and other stakeholders before passing the bill.
He added that during the public hearings conducted across the six geopolitical zones in July 2025, participants overwhelmingly supported the creation of state police.
“At each level of our consultation, nearly all stakeholders embraced the State Police Bill in the light of stark realities we are facing today,” he said.
The Senate leader noted that recommendations from the Nigeria Police contributed to the bill, particularly on accountability and oversight mechanisms aimed at preventing abuse of state police by political actors.
According to him, the police’s support for the proposal underscores its national significance in tackling insecurity at the state and local levels.
Bamidele also said the bill received broad bipartisan backing in both chambers of the National Assembly.
“Even though the APC is the majority, there are members of opposition parties — PDP, ADC, NDC and Labour Party — that exercised their discretion in favour of the Bill, mainly in the national interest and not on parochial basis.
“In the Senate, for instance, 84 out of 109 members voted clause by clause in support of the Bill. This accounted for 77.06 per cent approval at the Senate alone,” he said.
He argued that national security should transcend political affiliations, saying political actors in other countries often set aside partisan interests to support initiatives that strengthen security.
Bamidele called on opposition parties to contribute constructive ideas that would promote peace and stability, adding that they have a responsibility to offer alternatives that would strengthen the country.
“Even when they disagree on some grounds, they are under obligations to provide credible and useful ideas that can make our nation better and greater. Unfortunately, they have not passed this critical test of opposition democracy,” he said.
News
Probe N6.3bn Constituency Funds Or Face Legal Action, SERAP Tells Akpabio, Abbas
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to refer allegations of the diversion or non-accounting of over ?6.3 billion in constituency project funds to anti-corruption agencies for investigation and possible prosecution.
The group also urged the National Assembly leadership to ensure that anyone found culpable is prosecuted where sufficient admissible evidence exists, while all diverted or unaccounted public funds are recovered and paid into the treasury.
In a letter dated June 27, 2026, and signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP said the allegations were contained in the Auditor-General of the Federation’s 2022 Annual Report, published on September 9, 2025.
The organisation disclosed this in a statement signed and released by Oluwadare, yesterday.
SERAP also asked Akpabio and Abbas to disclose the identities of contractors and companies, including their shareholders and beneficial owners, that allegedly received constituency project funds but failed to execute the projects.
It gave the National Assembly seven days to act on its recommendations, warning that it would institute legal proceedings should the legislature fail to respond.
“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel you and the National Assembly to comply with our request in the public interest,” the letter stated.
It said, “The allegations involve several federal ministries, departments and agencies, including the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON); the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Volm; the Federal Polytechnic, Udana; the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP); and the National Institute of Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS).
“The Auditor-General identified numerous cases of payments into private bank accounts, contracts awarded without due process, payments for contracts not executed or services not rendered, undocumented expenditures, inflated contracts, procurement irregularities and failures to account for public funds, recommending in each case that the funds be recovered and remitted to the treasury.
“According to the 2022 audited report, contained in pages 367 to 396, the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON or Council) Abuja paid over ‘N22 million [N22,944,565.16] into the private account of some members of staff of the Council from the Constituency Projects Fund Account.
“There ‘was no evidence of the utilization of the funds and no explanations on the purpose for the payment of such amount into the individual accounts.”
SERAP added, “The Council (EHORECON) also in 2021 ‘awarded suspicious consultancy contracts of over N12 million [N12,030,818.29] for the development of Modern Abattoirs in Kebbi State and the supervision of 7 projects in Kebbi, Jigawa, and Headquarters Abuja.
“The money was to ‘produce bills of quantity, architectural design, structural design, mechanical design, and electrical designs for the contracts and supervision.’ But ‘the ‘items could not be found.’”
Altogether, SERAP said the Auditor-General’s 2022 report alleged EHORECON paid more than ?1.8 billion in constituency project funds through questionable transactions.
For the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Vom, SERAP said the institution “in 2022 reportedly ‘paid over N279 million [N279,700,500.00] to 3 contractors to empower and train youths in selected vocational areas in Borgu and Kontagora, Niger State, train women and youths in entrepreneurship in Niger East Senatorial District and to train youths and women in agro production and self-reliance in Barki Ladi/Riyom Federal Constituency, Plateau State.
“But the money was paid to the contractors without any document.’”
Other irregularities involving the college include another ?279.7 million in mobilisation fees allegedly paid without documentation, and more than ?629.4 million paid to unqualified contractors for various constituency projects without evidence of due process, contract advertisements or details of the contractors.
SERAP further alleged that the Auditor-General’s report identified multiple financial irregularities involving the Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State, including over ?407 million allegedly paid as mobilisation fees without supporting documents, more than ?399 million paid to unqualified contractors, contracts allegedly inflated by over ?192 million, over ?279 million paid for projects not fully executed, ?50 million allegedly paid for an unexecuted borehole project, and more than ?83 million disbursed without the required documentation or approvals.
It also alleged that NAPTIP reportedly irregularly awarded contracts worth over ?21.8 million, paid more than ?176.8 million for logistics and consultancy services without supporting documents, and disbursed over ?89.6 million and ?4.4 million for projects that were allegedly not executed.
The report also alleged that NILDS failed to submit audited financial statements for 2012 to 2022, did not remit over ?15 million in stamp duties, and spent ?1.6 million without authorisation from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.
SERAP said the report recommended the recovery of the affected funds and their remittance to the treasury.
It argued that corruption in constituency projects disproportionately affects poor and vulnerable Nigerians by diverting resources meant for public services and development.
It added that the National Assembly, in exercising its oversight responsibilities, should demonstrate leadership by ensuring accountability in the management of constituency project funds.
The organisation further argued that the allegations, if established, would amount to breaches of the Constitution, the Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007 and the Public Procurement Act 2007, which require transparency, accountability and due process in the management of public resources.
Politics
Parties’ Deregistration: How Justice Lifu Overruled Appeal Court Justices
Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday brushed aside the order of the Court of Appeal in Abuja which ordered him to stay proceedings in a suit that sought deregistration of the African Democratic Party (ADC), Accord Party and three others.
The Court of Appeal in a unanimous decision of a panel of three Justices had on May 22, 2026 directed the Federal High Court Judge not to proceed with the suit until an appeal pending before them and filed by Accord Party is resolved.
In a Certified True Copy Enrol Order of the Superior Court, Justices Mohammed Danjuma, Adebukola Banjoko and Oyejoju Oyewumi asked the lower Court Judge to stay proceedings until all issues on the appeal filed by the Accord Party were resolved
Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State had, through the Accord Party, applied to justice Lifu to join him as a defendant in the deregistration legal battle instituted by a group of former legislators.
The contention of the Osun State governor was that he had a stake in the Accord Party, being the platform he was seeking re-election in the August 15 gubernatorial poll in the state.
In his ruling, Justice Lifu on April 27 ruled against the Osun State governor, rejecting his request to be joined in the suit to defend his own position and interest.
Not satisfied with the Federal High Court decision, the Osun State governor, through his lawyer, Musibau Adetunbi (SAN), moved to the Court of Appeal in Abuja where he challenged the Justice Lifu decision to refuse to allow him join the suit.
After listening to the argument canvassed, especially that he has interest to protect as Accord Party gubernatorial candidate for Osun State governorship election, the three Justices of the Court of Appeal, unanimously directed Justice Lifu to allow them look into the grievances of the governor.
In specific terms, the Court of Appeal Justices directed Justice Lifu not to proceed further with the matter and fixed October 27 to determine the interlocutory appeal of the appellant.
However, when the certified enroll order and notice of appeal were served on Justice Peter Lifu by Mr Adetunbi (SAN), the judge rejected it on the ground that it was a ploy to arrest his judgment in the matter.
Although the judge had adjourned his judgment delivery in the matter indefinitely, he finally made a dramatic turn around on Monday and proceeded to deliver the judgment that has now proscribed the five political parties.
-
Rivers3 days ago
Rivers Police Uncovers Firearm Concealed In Loaf Of Bread
-
Niger Delta3 days agoPro-Chancellor Hands Over Okey Onuchuku Peace, Conflict Institute Building
-
Sports3 days ago
Six Nigerians To Play For NBA Teams
-
News3 days agoFubara Reaffirms Commitment To Blue Economy, Private Sector Growth …Calls For Protection Of Marine Resources
-
Business3 days agoIPMAN Raises Concern Over Delay In Chinese Refinery Deal …Predicts Lower Fuel Prices Through Competition
-
Business3 days ago
Gas Economy: Decade of Gas, Pi-CNG/ EV Deepen Media Engagement
-
Politics3 days agoSenate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill
-
Sports3 days ago
NPFL Warns Newly Promoted Clubs
