Oil & Energy

Nigerians Want FG To Discontinue Fuel Subsidy Payment

Published

11 years ago

June 29, 2015

L-R: National President, Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (ipman), Chief Obasi Lawrence, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum Resources, Mr taiye Haruna, Executive Secretary, Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (moman), Mr Obafemi Olawore and representative of the Group Managing Director of nnpc, Dr David Ige, at a stakeholders meeting to address the current petrol scarcity tagged: petrol queues must go, in Abuja, recently. Photo: NAN

A cross section of Nigeri
ans on Wednesday urged the Federal Government to discontinue its subsidy payment policy to marketers importing fuel.
The respondents told newsmen in Lagos that removal of petroleum subsidy would be good for Nigeria’s prosperity.
The Director, Centre for Bee Research and Development, Mr Bidemi Ojelewe, said that the controversy about the fuel subsidy payments was demoralising to the populace, and noted that the country’s economy would rapidly develop and prosper if normalcy reigned over subsidy payments to marketers.
“Removal of fuel subsidy is inevitable if our government wish to meet the pressing anticipation of the masses,’’ he said.
Prof. Michael Akur, who lectures at the Department of Political Science, University of Jos, said: “The discontinuance of subsidy on fuel consumption will reduce the inflationary pressures our economy is facing.
“We should have a departure of the subsidy era as soon as possible.
“This departure is necessary because our economy has not grown in the manner it ought to.
“This economy will not progress if government continue to subsidise consumption of commodities such as fuel and the likes,’’ he said.
A civil servant, Mr Shuaibu Yusuf, urged the Federal Government to scrap the programme of fuel subsidy payment and disburse funds earned by such scrapping to revamp the power sector.
“Our power sector is one area that needs more funds to be revamped.
“The money realised from the stoppage of subsidy payment should go into solving other challenges in other sectors.
“Government should introduce a modern mass transit scheme across the country so that ordinary citizens will not fill the impact of subsidy removal if eventually done,’’ he said.
A proprietor of a medium-size enterprise in Lagos, Mr Akeem Ogidan, said that the Federal Government policy to part finance cost of fuel consumed by Nigerians was not sustainable.
Ogidan, the Chief Executive Officer, Tanke Paper Mills, said that governments at all levels needed to pursue policies that would save and earn for them more money.
He also noted that to continue the fuel subsidy policy in era of declining oil prices in the international market would worsen Nigeria’s economy.
“We must get rid of the subsidy scheme especially in this dispensation where austerity is been experienced in virtually all states in the Nigerian federation.
“Almost half of the state governors cannot pay salaries and the reality is that the need of sustaining the subsidy is not tenable,’’ Ogidan said.
According to the Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), the federal government spent a whopping N4.5 trillion on fuel subsidy claims between 2006 and 2012.
An economist, Mr Bismarck Rewane, has also advised the Federal Government to remove the fuel subsidy on petroleum products for speedy development of the country.
Rewane, the Managing Director of Financial Derivatives Limited, made the call in a lecture on “The Nigerian Economy and Business Outlook”.
He delivered the lecture at the Annual General Meeting of the International Chamber of Commerce Nigeria in Lagos on Thursday.
Rewane said that the subsidy regime was fraught with corruption and gains from subsidy removal should be utilised for projects that would develop the nation as against enriching few Nigerians.
He said that subsidy removal would reduce the country’s huge debt profile, block government leakages and aid rehabilitation of refineries and depots in the country.
According to him, the falling global crude oil price which has caused a dip in the nation’s revenue necessitated a stop to fuel subsidy payment.
“If the government does not remove the fuel subsidy, the subsidy payment will cripple the economy of the country, “Rewane said.
He said that the removal of fuel subsidy would reduce government’s financial burden and drive the growth of the economy.

Oil & Energy

NERC, OYSERC Partner To Strengthen Regulation

Published

6 days ago

February 23, 2026

The Tide

THE Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has stressed the need for strict adherence to due process in operationalizing state electricity regulatory bodies.

It, however, pledged institutional and technical support to the Oyo State Electricity Regulatory Commission (OYSERC).

The Chairman, NERC, Dr Musiliu Oseni, who made the position known while receiving the OYSERC delegation, emphasised that the establishment and take-off of state commissions must align fully with the law setting them up.

Oseni said that the NERC remains committed to partnering with State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERC) to guarantee their institutional stability, operational effectiveness and long-term success.

He insisted that regulatory coordination between federal and state institutions is critical in the evolving electricity market framework, noting that collaboration would help to build strong institutions capable of delivering sustainable outcomes for the sector.

Also speaking, the Acting Chairman, OYSERC and leader of the delegation, Prof. Dahud Kehinde Shangodoyin, said that the visit was aimed at formally introducing the commission’s acting leadership to the NERC and laying the groundwork for a productive working relationship.

Shangodoyin said , the acting members were appointed to provide direction and lay a solid foundation for the commission during its transitional period, pending the appointment of substantive members.

“We are here to formally introduce the acting leadership of OYSERC and to establish a working relationship with NERC as we commence our regulatory responsibilities,” he said.

He acknowledged NERC’s readiness to provide technical and regulatory support, particularly in the area of capacity development, describing the backing as essential for strengthening the commission’s operations at this formative stage.

“We appreciate NERC’s willingness to support us technically and regulatorily, especially in building our capacity during this transition,” he added.

Oil & Energy

NLC Faults FG’s 3trn Dept Payment To GenCos

Published

6 days ago

February 23, 2026

The Tide

The Nigeria Labour Congress and the Association of Power Generation Companies have engaged in a showdown over federal government legacy debt.

NLC president Joe Ajaero has faulted the federal government’s move to give GenCos N3 trillion from the Federation account as repayment for a power sector legacy debt, which amounts to N6.5 trillion.

In a statement on Thursday, Ajaero said the Federal Government proposed the N3 trillion payment and the N6 trillion debt as a heist and grand deception to shortchange the Nigerian people.

“Nigerians cannot and should not continue to pay for darkness,” Ajaero stated.

Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Association of Power Generation Companies, APGC, Dr. Joy Ogaji, said Ajaero may be ignorant of the true state of things, insisting that the federal government is indebted to GenCos to the tune of N6.5 trillion.

She feared the longstanding conflict could result in the eventual collapse of the country’s power.

According to her, the federal government’s N501 billion issuance of power sector bonds is inadequate to address its accumulated debt.

Oil & Energy

PENGASSAN Rejects Presidential EO On Oil, Gas Revenue Remittance ……… Seeks PIA Review

Published

6 days ago

February 23, 2026

The Tide

The Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria(PENGASSAN) Festus Osifo, has faulted the public explanation surrounding the Federal Government’s recent oil revenue Executive Order(EO).

President of the association, Festus Osifo, argued that claims about a 30 per cent deduction from petroleum sharing contract revenue are misleading.

Recall that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, last Wednesday, February 18, signed the executive order directing that royalty oil, tax oil, profit oil, profit gas, and other revenues due to the Federation under production sharing, profit sharing, and risk service contracts be paid directly into the Federation Account.

The order also scrapped the 30 per cent Frontier Exploration Fund under the PIA and stopped the 30 per cent management fee on profit oil and profit gas retained by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.

In his reaction, Osifo, while addressing journalists, in Lagos, Thursday, said the figure being referenced does not represent gross revenue accruing to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.

He explained that revenues from production sharing contracts are subject to several deductions before arriving at what is classified as profit oil or profit gas.

Osifo also urged President Bola Tinubu to withdraw his recently signed Presidential Executive Order to Safeguard Federation Oil and Gas Revenues and Provide Regulatory Clarity, 2026.

He warned that the directive undermines the Petroleum Industry Act and could create uncertainty in the oil and gas industry, insisting that any amendment to the existing legal framework must pass through the National Assembly.

Osifo argued that an executive order cannot override a law enacted by the National Assembly, describing the move as setting a troubling precedent.

“Yes, that is what should be done from the beginning. You can review the laws of a land. There is no law that is perfect,” he said.

He added that the President should constitute a team to review the PIA, identify its strengths and weaknesses, and forward proposed amendments to lawmakers.

“When you get revenue from PSC, you have to make some deductibles. You deduct royalties. You deduct tax. You also deduct the cost of cost recovery. Once you have done that, you will now have what we call profit oil or profit gas. Then that is where you now deduct the 30 per cent,” he stated..

According to him, when the deductions are properly accounted for, the 30 per cent being referenced translates to about two per cent of total revenue from the production sharing contracts.

“In effect, that deduction is about two per cent of the revenue of the PLCs,” he added, maintaining that the explanation presented in the public domain did not accurately reflect the structure of the deductions.

Osifo warned that removing the affected portion of the revenue could have operational implications for NNPC Ltd, noting that the funds are used to meet salary obligations and other internal expenses.

“That two per cent is what NNPC uses to pay salaries and meet some of its obligations.The one you are also removing from the midstream and downstream, it is part of what they use in meeting their internal obligations. So as you are removing this, how are they going to pay salaries?” he queried.

Beyond the immediate impact on the company’s workforce, he cautioned that regulatory uncertainty could affect investor confidence in the sector.

“If the international community and investors lose confidence in Nigeria, it has a way of affecting investment. That should be the direction. You don’t put a cow before the horse,” he added.

According to him, stakeholders, including labour unions and industry operators, should be given the opportunity to make inputs at the National Assembly as part of the amendment process saying “That is how laws are refined,”