Connect with us

Business

Contributory Pension Scheme: What Stake For Rivers Workers?

Published

on

The Pension Reform Bill which President Olusegun Obasanjo signed into law on June 25, 2004 did not provide coverage for state and local government employees.

Unlike the 1990 Pension Act which it replaced, and which gave coverage to all retiring workers in the state service based on counterpart financial payments by the federal and state governments, the new Act is clearly restricted to federal and private-sector employees.

This is clearly expressed in Section 2 of the Pension Act which states as follows: “The scheme shall apply to all employees in the public service of the federation, federal capital territory and the private sector.”

It is also instructive to point out that even as the law makes contribution to the scheme mandatory for all federal civil servants and FCT workers, its application to the private sector is only limited to firms with five or more employees.

As for workers at the lower tiers of government, the Pension Act leaves the decision to the discretion of their respective employers. This simply means that states and local councils are at liberty to decide on whether or not to enact laws that will enable their workers participate in the contributory pension scheme (CPS).

The National Pensions Commission (PenCom), which is the apex regulatory body for pension matters in the country, said it has, however, continued to engage states and local governments in discussions aimed at persuading them to key into the new pension system.

The Commission’s efforts appear to have been yielding results, after all. This is because available statistics indicate that as at December 2011, six states had commenced full implementation of the scheme; 11 were already working out structures for its take-off; 17 still had theirs pending at their state legislatures; while two states were yet to initiate any visible action on the matter.

In enacting the new Pension Act, its proponents may have wished for a system which would ensure that workers save toward their retirement and that receipt of retirement benefits is made regular and much easier.

This is surely designed to significantly reduce (if not completely eliminate) the sufferings of pensioners. These sufferings include but are not limited to: dying without receiving a dime of their benefits even after some years into retirement; collapsing from hunger and exhaustion while on queue for the many identification exercises that precede each payment; giving up a large chunk of their benefits to fraudulent pension officials in order to avoid the unnecessary delays associated with the processing of pension documents.

In general terms, the CPS requires that each participating worker opens a Retirement Savings Account (RSA) with any Pension Fund Administrator (PFA) of his choice. This account is to be operated with a Personal Identification Number (PIN).

The initial rate of monthly contributions by the worker and his employer is a minimum of seven and half per cent each. This means that every worker will have at least seven and half per cent of his emolument (annual basic salary, transport and housing allowance) deducted from his monthly salary. In the same vein, his employer will also make a contribution of, at least, the same amount on behalf of the worker. Their combined minimum of 15 per cent contribution is then paid into the account of the worker’s chosen PFA with a Pension Fund Custodian (PFC) which, in turn, advises the PFA to credit the worker’s RSA.

Again, whatever may be a worker’s monthly cash contribution, such social insurance expense is regarded under the Pension Act as a tax-deductible expenditure. This means that the money is tax-free and should be deducted from the worker’s salary before his personal income tax is computed. The same goes for his employer with regard to any company income tax assessment.

But even with all the strict measures outlined in the Pension Act to effectively regulate the administration of pension funds in Nigeria, sad tales have continued to trail the CPS.

The recent revelations concerning the alleged misappropriation of N88 billion police pension money by Mr. Abdulrashid Maina, chairman of the Presidential Pension Recovery Task Team (PPRTT) has become a cause of serious concern to existing and potential contributors. Even the ongoing probe of the pensions sub-sector by the National Assembly has done little to douse such apprehension.

PenCom helmsman, Mr. Muhammad Ahmad, has, however, continued to assure the nation that the CPS is very much on course. According to him, about 5.01 million workers are already registered under the scheme in both the public and private sectors. Of this number, 31 per cent are federal employees while 23 percent and 46 percent are state and private-sector workers, respectively.

He said that the value of pension assets under the scheme stood at N2.45 trillion in December 2011 with a monthly contribution of N20 billion and 30 per cent annual growth rate.

Ahmad also disclosed that the Federal Government had, as at the same period, remitted N604 billion into a Contributory Pension Account with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) out of which N449.35 billion was paid into the various RSAs.

Here in Rivers State, it’s only a matter of time before public servants join their counterparts from the few states that have started to implement the new pension scheme. This follows Governor Chibuike Amaechi’s recent assent to a Contributory Pension Bill by the Rivers State House of Assembly and the earlier assurance by the Chairman of the State Pensions Board, Mrs. Edna Alikor, to the effect that modalities are being worked out for an effective commencement of the scheme in the state.

Alikor was said to have given this assurance after a maiden meeting of her board with relevant stakeholders in the state, including the Head of Service, Mrs. Esther Anucha, and the Finance Commissioner, Dr. Chamberlain Peterside.

She also disclosed that workers who have less than seven years to retire would not be eligible to participate in the scheme as stated in the pension bill.

While noting that workers retiring from the state’s public service currently receive their pensions and gratuities within two months of retirement, the board chairman also described as pitiable a situation where long-retired persons still receive a monthly pension of less than N500, coupled with the existence of names of dead retirees in the government’s payroll.

Unlike some states which rushed into the new pension scheme in order to satisfy a Debt Management Office (DMO) condition for bond issuance, and are now many months in default of their pension contributions, Rivers State cannot be said to be in any such haste even as it strives to work for the overall interest of its indigenes, workers inclusive.

The establishment of a dependable pension scheme for a state’s workforce certainly requires the exercise of due diligence on the part of the pensions board, especially in a system that allows the option of selecting PFAs and allocating ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs) to such pension managers.

Even as the rule requires that PFAs invest pension funds strictly within the objectives of safety and fair returns on the amounts or assets invested, it goes without saying that Rivers workers and, indeed, the entire state stand to benefit more if contributions from civil servants are saved with those PFAs that have always identified with the state and are most likely to channel such investible funds into safe and viable projects located within the state.

But while workers patiently await the commencement of this laudable scheme, let it be said that the reintroduction of pay advice into the salary payment system is long overdue. It beats most minds to realise that Rivers workers received pay slips along with their salaries some years ago when the civil service system knew next to nothing about computers and information technology whereas such rights are lacking now that the entire system is computerised.

As of right, a worker deserves to know how much increments and or deductions that apply to his income even before such is paid.

 

Ibelema Jumbo

Continue Reading

Business

AFAN Unveils Plans To Boost Food Production In 2026

Published

on

The leadership of the All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN) has set the tone for the new year with a renewed focus on food security, unity and long-term growth of the agricultural sector.
The association announced that its General Assembly of Farmers Congress will take place from January 15 to 17, 2026 at the Abuja Chamber of Commerce and Industries, along Lugbe Airport Road, in the Federal Capital Territory.
The gathering is expected to bring together farmers, policymakers, investors and development partners to shape a fresh direction for Nigerian agriculture.
In a New Year address to members and stakeholders, AFAN president, Dr Farouk Rabiu Mudi, said the congress would provide a strategic forum for reviewing past challenges and outlining practical solutions for the future.
He explained that the event would serve as a rallying point for innovation, collaboration and economic renewal within the sector.
Mudi commended farmers across the country for their determination and hard work, despite years of insecurity, climate-related pressures and economic uncertainty.
According to him, their resilience has kept food production alive and positioned agriculture as a stabilising force in the national economy.
He noted that AFAN intends to build on this strength by resetting agribusiness operations to improve productivity and sustainability.
The AFAN leader appealed to government institutions, private investors and development organisations to deepen their engagement with the association.
He stressed the need for collective action to confront persistent issues such as insecurity in farming communities, climate impacts and market instability.
He also urged members to put aside internal disputes and personal interests, encouraging cooperation and shared responsibility in pursuit of national development.
Mudi outlined key priorities that include increasing food output, expanding support for farmers at the grassroots and strengthening local manufacturing through partnerships with both domestic and international investors adding that reducing dependence on imports remains critical to protecting the economy and creating jobs.
He stated that the upcoming congress will feature the launch of AFAN’s twenty-five-year agricultural mechanisation roadmap, alongside the announcement of new partnerships designed to accelerate growth across the value chain.
Participants, he said wi also have opportunities for networking and knowledge exchange aimed at transforming agriculture into a more competitive and technology-driven sector.
As part of its modernisation drive, AFAN is further encouraging members nationwide to enrol for the newly introduced Digital ID Card.
Mudi said the initiative will improve transparency, ensure proper farmer identification and make it easier to access support programmes and services.
Reaffirming the association’s long-term goal, he said the vision of national food sufficiency by 2030 remains achievable if unity and collaboration are sustained.
He expressed optimism that with collective effort, Nigeria’s agricultural sector can overcome its challenges and deliver a more secure and prosperous future.
Lady Usendi
Continue Reading

Business

Industrialism, Agriculture To End Food Imports, ex-AfDB Adviser Tells FG

Published

on

Former Senior Special Adviser on Industrialisation to the President of the African Development Bank (AfDB), Professor Banji Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, has urged the Nigerian government to urgently industrialise the agricultural sector as a pathway to food security, economic diversification, and sustainable job creation.
Professor Oyelaran-Oyeyinka made the call while speaking at the Oyo State Economic Summit held at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, during a lecture titled “Industrialising Agriculture for Economic Development and Food Security: Enhancing National Economies and Sub-National Entities.”
He cautioned that despite Nigeria’s vast arable land and its position as a leading global producer of crops such as cassava and yams, the country remains food-deficient and heavily dependent on costly food imports.
He highlighted that Nigeria spends over one trillion naira annually importing wheat, rice, sugar, and fish, a persistent trend that drains foreign exchange, undermines local farmers, weakens industrial competitiveness, and fuels unemployment.
The development economist argued that the solution lay in transforming agriculture from a subsistence activity into a modern, industrial enterprise capable of producing surplus, supporting manufacturing, and driving broad-based economic growth.
He explained that industrialising agriculture does not mean replacing rural communities with factories, but rather empowering farmers with technology, skills, infrastructure, and market access to raise productivity and incomes.
According to Professor Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, Nigeria’s low agricultural productivity reflected deeper structural challenges, including weak education systems, limited skills, and inadequate investment in technology and infrastructure.
He noted that countries that successfully transitioned from low-income to middle-income status did so by modernising agriculture alongside industrial development, creating strong linkages between farms, processing industries, and markets.
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka highlighted stark yield disparities between Africa and Asia, noting that cereal yields across African countries remain less than a third of those achieved in East Asia.
This gap, he said, explains why African economies struggle to compete globally and why industrialisation efforts have stalled.
Professor Oyelaran-Oyeyinka outlined key pillars of agricultural industrialisation, including mechanisation, value addition, integrated supply chains, access to finance, improved seed systems, and targeted investment in human and technological capabilities.
He stressed that farms must be treated as “factories without roofs,” capable of feeding into agro-processing, manufacturing, and export industries.
The visiting professor at The Open University in Milton Keynes said the economic benefits of such a transformation would be far-reaching, including reduced dependence on oil, large-scale job creation, significant foreign exchange savings, and stronger national food security.
Drawing lessons from Vietnam, he described how deliberate agricultural modernisation helped transform the Southeast Asian country from a food importer into one of the world’s leading exporters of rice, coffee, cashew, and seafood.
Vietnam’s agribusiness exports, he said, now generate tens of billions of dollars annually and underpin the country’s wider industrial success.
He attributed Vietnam’s success to consistent policies, heavy investment in agro-processing, strong farmer–industry linkages, and the use of special economic zones to drive value addition and export competitiveness.
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka noted that similar models are emerging in Nigeria, including in Oyo State, but warned that they require reliable infrastructure, policy stability, and empowered governance to succeed.
The professor called on state governments to prioritise power, roads, and logistics, strengthen agricultural extension services, and create efficient special agro-industrial processing zones that attract major domestic and international investors.
He also urged the private sector to view agriculture as a profitable business frontier rather than a social obligation, noting that Nigeria’s future prosperity depended less on oil and more on harnessing the productive potential of its land and people.
“We are a nation that can feed itself and others, yet we remain food-insecure and overly dependent on imports. This paradox is holding back our economy.”
“Industrialising agriculture does not erase our rural roots; it transforms them into engines of productivity, wealth creation and national development.”
“Subsistence agriculture is both a cause and a consequence of technological backwardness, and no country has reached middle-income status without first modernising its agriculture.”
“A farm must be treated as a factory without a roof, connected to processing, logistics, finance and markets. Vietnam shows that agricultural transformation is not accidental; it is the result of deliberate policies that link farmers to industry and global markets.”
“The seeds of Nigeria’s prosperity are not buried in oil wells; they are sown in the fertile soils of our ecological zones,” he said.
Lady Usendi
Continue Reading

Business

Cashew Industry Can Generate $10bn Annually- Association

Published

on

The President of the National Cashew Association of Nigeria (NCAN), Dr Ojo Ajanaku, has said Nigeria could earn $10 billion annually from cashew production, with $3 billion coming from cashew sales alone.
Ajanaku made this known during a press conference organised ahead of the 4th National Cashew Day, scheduled to hold from Jan. 22 to Jan. 24 in Abuja, with the the theme: “Unlocking the Full Potential of Nigeria’s Cashew Industry”.
He said that poor export documentation and weak repatriation of proceeds were causing major losses to the Nigerian economy.
“A substantial volume of cashew exported from Nigeria leaves the country without proper export proceeds forms, as exporters allegedly avoid bringing earnings back into the country,” he said.
He said during the last export season alone, Nigeria reportedly exported over 400,000 tonnes of cashew valued at about $700 million.
Ajanaku noted that deliberate investments in production and processing could unlock far greater potentials.
“If Nigeria produces just two million tonnes of cashew annually, which is achievable in less than five years, and sells at an average of $1,500 per tonne, the country would earn about $3 billion yearly,” he said.
He added that beyond raw cashew exports, enormous value lies in processing and by-products such as Cashew Nut Shell Fluid (CNSF) and cashew cake, which are largely wasted locally.
“In Vietnam, cashew cake alone sells for about 95 cents per kilogram, while in Nigeria processors pay to dispose of it as waste,” he noted.
Ajanaku explained that full local processing of cashew and its by-products could generate not less than $10 billion annually for Nigeria while creating thousands of jobs across the value chain.
He stressed that Nigeria has the production capacity, while countries like Vietnam possess advanced processing technology.
The NCAN President further disclosed that the association is strengthening partnerships with key government institutions, including the Ministry of Finance, the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, NEXIM Bank, and other agencies to reposition the sector.
He added that a landmark Memorandum of Understanding has been signed between Nigeria and Vietnam to facilitate technology transfer and deepen cooperation in cashew processing.
He expressed optimism that with sustained government support and effective regulation, the cashew industry could become a major driver of economic growth, foreign exchange earnings, and industrial development in Nigeria.
“Producing states should be given priority. For example, Kogi State, which has the highest cashew production in the country, has no factory. A lot of potentials can come from Kogi State for the country,” he said.
Also speaking, NCAN National Secretary, Augustine Edieme, said strategic plans are being made to showcase Nigeria’s potentials during the 4th National Cashew Day, which he described as a key opportunity to attract bigger investments and investors into the industry.
“We are not just talking about the cashew seeds. We need to crack the fruit shell and discover the value in cashew shells. Industrialisation of the cashew industry is key to driving the Nigerian economy,” he said.
The representative of the Federation of Agricultural Commodity Associations of Nigeria (FACAN), Sunday Ojonugwa, pledged that FACAN would optimally support the cashew association to ensure the sector reaches its full potential.
Lady Usendi
Continue Reading

Trending