Connect with us

Maritime

Ports Dev And Policy Implications

Published

on

There is a popular saying that “when two elephants fight, the grass suffers” this scenario could better explain what has come to be of the Nigerian Port Authority (NPA) with the policy of ports concession introduced a few years back after a very serious clash of interest between the government and the Maritime workers Union of Nigeria (MWUN), over the policy.

The federal government embarked on privatisation and commercialisation of Nigerian ports, policy in 1991 which eventually disengaged over 8,000 officers and staff of the authority.

Out of this number terminated that year, about half were professionals, trained by the authority in various universities abroad and two-thirds of the remaining number were people who understudied the Hamburg Port Consultant (HPC), according to records.

Port experts from Germany had operated the Nigerian ports effectively, before some greedy Nigerians who envied their position maneuvered to chase them out of operations and quickly occupied their quarters which were given to them for their services as consultants.

When these foreigners were in service as expatriates, both revenue and operations were not disrupted, as operating cost and wastage in term of fraud was almost absent.

From records, operations of the NPA began to dwindle when Nigerians who understudied the expatriates with the view of taking over from them, as well as the majority of the middle-level manpower who were trained in various universities and ports all over the world were disengaged, leaving about one third of the workforce.

As a result of this, much pressure mounted on the remaining workers, and there was serious cargo and ship congestion to the extent that office staff, including typist were deployed to the traffic department, on board ships, at shore quay apron and staking areas of operations.

As unskilled labour then, a lot of things took place among shipping companies, freight forwards and stevedoring companies. A lot of losses were recorded by the NPA, forcing the authority to go into mass employment of graduates, secretaries and other required officers, who were used to fill the gap so created by the rationalising policy.

That apart, today, another policy popularly known as port concessioning has been introduced, without minding the consequences, not only to the maritime sector, but to the economy also. Developed economies that opted for concessioning did put their economic indices intact, but our economy is so loose and almost unregulated.

The Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) we thought would improve our economy just led to more debt and borrowing, whereas in other developing economies, the policy improved their economy, and we are living testimonies that the negative effect of SAP is still telling on the Nigerian economy.

Then military head of state made a significant statement that “Nigeria’s problems have defied all economic principles, and are we sure the leakages that pushed SAP to our optimal financial mess will not repeat itself?

Port concessioning chronicled from port privatisation, which means  that most of the area of services in the port will be privately operated under a lease agreement.

The term concessioning agreement means that NPA is restricted to being a regulatory body of the port (landlord) and will no longer offer services, as the role of NPA on the new arrangement could be said to be mere fanciful.

The NPA lack the political will and could not check the concessionaire firms, even the charges they impose on importers for one service or the order. Importers who may be compelled to use the services of these private firms cry over high charges, as the NPA can not dictate how much charges the firms should impose on their client.

Such scenario will also lure the multinational shipping companies to introduce  multiple charges on Nigerian importers and the effect will be transferred to the Nigerian consumers.

Talking about duplicated charges by shipping operators, it was sometime reported that the Nigerian Shippers Council (NSC) detected about eleven charges imposed by the multinational shipping firm, some of which are not applicable in Nigerian ports.

Such charges include: Shipping companies terminal charges, terminal handling charge; transfer charge; port operations surcharge, commission on turn-over charge, documentation and administrative charge, manifest amendment charge, container deposit, container demurrage and rent/equipment charge. Apart from the above charges, NPA still collect some of their charges from importers.

In the Rivers Ports, especially the Port Harcourt port complex, the activities of some concessionaires create room for one to question the viability of the policy in terms of accelerated development and employment generation.

The Bua ports and Terminal Limited, one of the concessionaires in Port Harcourt wharf had apart from reducing the workforce it inherited which are mostly dock labour workers, it has also up till now failed to rebuild the collapsed quay apron (Berth) in its area of operation.

One could begin to wonder if the terms of concessioning agreement did not cover the aspect of port development and other areas like development of the host communities within which the concessionaires operate.

Rather than pursue programmes that will upgrade the general port condition to make it better than how they met it, some of these concessionaires had  remained adamant to issues of port development and employment generation, and this simply suggest that their focus is only on how they will maximise profit, and whatever the effect, implication with respect to their activities on the environment is not much of concern to them.

On the part of the NPA that has lost substantial number of their professional manpower to the concessioning policy, it has now known that most of those staff lost through retrenchment in concessioning are still needed to run the organisation, particularly for those vital technical and specilalised areas that could not be easily be replaced.

In that regard, the NPA had turn-around to re-engage some of these old staff so as to enable it cope with the work load  and dire demand for adequate manpower to accomplish stated goals.

From all indications. The new  regime of port concessioning has not yeilded the desired objective so envisaged. In the past six years of its implementation. Rather than create employment, it has reduced the workforce, and on the other side, the development of both the port environment and the host communities  have not been properly attended to.

The fact that the NPA is still in need of some of the staff it lost to the concessioning policy, for which it engaged some of them on contract, and the fact that port development so envisaged as well as in employment which had not changed suggest that the concessioning policy though might be good, but the timing and implementation leaves much to be desired.

It is ideal that policy makers take their time to look at the various aspect of the implication, irrespective of the perceived profits.

Corlins Walter

Continue Reading

Maritime

NCC Announces Telecoms Facilities Protection Measures 

Published

on

The Nigerian Communications Commission has announced fresh measures to strengthen the protection of the nation’s critical digital infrastructure, in line with a presidential directive to secure assets vital to the country’s economy and security.
Telecommunications companies have experienced a sharp rise in vandalism targeting critical infrastructure in recent months, particularly since May 2025. This wave of deliberate attacks has affected major operators such as MTN, Airtel, and Glo, as well as tower companies like IHS Towers
The NCC Executive Vice Chairman, Aminu Maida, said the initiative to protect the facilities is aimed at ensuring the resilience of telecommunications and other digital infrastructure against cyberattacks, vandalism, and natural disasters.
“Protecting our critical information infrastructure is not just a regulatory mandate but a national security priority,” Maida said in a statement, after a stakeholders’ engagement in Abuja, recently.
He stated further that, “We are working closely with operators, security agencies, and other stakeholders to ensure proactive risk management, rapid incident response, and improved resilience.”
Operators reported at least five vandalism incidents daily since May 2025, compared to two per day prior to this period, amounting to 445 cases over 88 days.
The most severely hit regions include Delta, Rivers, Cross River, Akwa Ibom, Ondo, Edo, Kwara, Kaduna, Ogun, Lagos, Kogi, Ekiti, Osun, Imo, and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.
The NCC identified telecoms base stations, data centres, undersea cable landing stations, and other core network components as part of the critical assets requiring enhanced protection.
Industry players at the meeting welcomed the move, citing repeated incidents of fibre cuts, equipment theft, and sabotage that have disrupted connectivity across the country.
The initiative follows the President’s earlier directive to government agencies to align with the National Cybersecurity Policy and Strategy, which prioritises the protection of critical information infrastructure.
The Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria has repeatedly called for urgent intervention, including involvement from security agencies and adoption of the Critical National Infrastructure Act to protect telecom sites.
Continue Reading

Maritime

Bureaucracy, Relationship Gaps, Bane Of Maritime Safety Investigation – NSIB

Published

on

The Nigerian Safety Investigation Bureau (NSIB) has said there is a gap in the relationship between the Bureau and the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) on investigating accidents in the maritime sector.
The Bureau’s Director General, Capt. Alex Badeh Jr., who disclosed this recently in a chat with journalists, stated that full implementation of the NSIB Establishment Act 2022 would drastically reduce serious incidents and accidents and improve safety in all modes of transportation in Nigeria.
He, however, expressed regret that the bureau only gets information about most occurrences in the inland waterways from the media, emphasising that, as government organisations funded with taxpayers’ money, NIMASA and NSIB were supposed to work as a team, but lamented that bureaucracy was interfering with safety in the maritime industry.
He also stated that the Nigerian Railway Corporation (NRC) and NIWA were willing to collaborate with the NSIB and expressed optimism that the bureau would also bring NIMASA on board.
‘‘Engagement of investigations in other modes of transportation is a work in progress. Some of them will resume by September. We intend to engage retired personnel, and of course, we hope to get people seconded from the National Inland Waterways Authority (NIWA) and NIMASA, train them and teach them the procedures of our investigations”, he said.
Taking a cue from the aviation industry’s investigation of serious incidents and accidents, Badeh insisted that its inquiry into rail and maritime was not to apportion blame but reveal what led to such an occurrence.
This, he said, would not preclude any other form of investigation, including investigations into actions in civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings.
According to him, NIMASA’s total cooperation in fulfilling its mandate would enable the country to operate according to the procedure and policy requirements of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) while also plugging the system’s loopholes.
He argued that Nigeria needed to comply with the international standards for serious incidents and accident investigations.
He said this would further bolster stakeholders’ confidence in Nigeria’s system, increase its ratings in the comity of nations and prevent recurrence through the recommendations of its safety reports.
Badeh continued that to meet the expected standards, the bureau had already drafted the Maritime Safety Investigation Regulations 2025, the Railways (Investigation of Accident and Incidents) Regulation 2024, and the Civil Aviation (Investigation of Air Accidents and Incidents) Regulations 2025, hoping that all concerns would accept their implementations.
He debunked the notion in some quarters that the entrance of NSIB into accident investigation in the marine sector would lead to overlapping of functions in the industry.
According to him, the IMO recognised NIMASA as an investigator of marine accidents because the system was vacuumed. Still, it maintained that the emergence of NSIB had closed the gap in the system.
Badeh explained further that the bureau was on the verge of engaging investigators in the rail and maritime sectors to effectively investigate occurrences in those modes of transportation, assuring that some professionals would come on board by September and October this year to beef up its operations.
He expressed optimism that the NSIB was up to conducting a seamless investigation in the maritime sector, stressing that the bureau had already agreed with the Nigerian Navy to carry out this exercise.
Continue Reading

Maritime

UNDP, REA Partner On Clean Energy Transition

Published

on

The United Nations Development Programme and the Rural Electrification Agency have signed an agreement aimed at accelerating Nigeria’s clean energy transition, boosting innovation, and equipping a new generation of professionals for a future-ready energy sector.
The collaboration, formalised at a signing ceremony in Abuja, will be anchored on five key pillars: energising education and innovation; scaling skills development; supporting state-level policy reforms; unlocking innovative financing; and advancing research and public engagement.
Speaking at the event, the Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer of REA, Abba Aliyu, described the partnership as “a game-changer” for Nigeria’s renewable energy ambitions.
He said the initiative will build on ongoing Federal Government renewable energy scale-up efforts, unlock opportunities in local content and manufacturing, and drive sustainable investment.
“Our goal is to position Nigeria as a renewable energy hub, reduce governance costs, and catalyse innovation, research and development”,  Aliyu said.
He explained that the initiative would build on ongoing Federal Government renewable energy scale-up programmes, expand local content and manufacturing capacity, and attract sustainable investments into the sector.
Aliyu stressed that unlocking opportunities in clean energy would require practical strategies on local content, domestic manufacturing, and innovative finance, noting that these measures would cut governance costs while advancing sustainability.
The REA boss added that “the REA-UNDP partnership pillars are specifically targeted at advancing ongoing efforts in the clean energy space in Nigeria, catalysing opportunities across critical ecosystems and unlocking the full potential in innovation, R&D, local expertise and sustainable investment.”
On her part, the UNDP Resident Representative in Nigeria, Ms. Elsie G. Attafuah, said the collaboration represented a bold step toward a more sustainable and prosperous Nigeria, adding that it would not only expand access to clean energy but also drive innovation, youth empowerment, and job creation.
“This collaboration with the Rural Electrification Agency is a bold step toward a more sustainable and prosperous Nigeria.
“Our partnership will not only provide access to clean energy but also serve as a powerful engine for innovation, youth empowerment, and job creation. We are moving beyond simply powering communities to igniting their full potential.
“We are moving beyond simply powering communities to igniting their full potential”, she said.
Attafuah also highlighted the importance of processing Nigeria’s natural resources, such as lithium, into value-added renewable energy products like lithium battery systems, while embedding innovation and research into the nation’s learning institutions to catalyse the creation of green jobs.
Under the agreement, UNDP’s University Innovation Pods and Maker Spaces will be integrated into REA’s Energising Education Programme to transform federal universities and teaching hospitals into hubs of practical innovation.
The deal will also scale REA’s NEXTGEN initiative, designed to train a new generation of clean energy professionals, thereby creating a national talent pipeline and addressing youth unemployment in the sector.
At the subnational level, UNDP and REA will provide policy and technical support to help states implement the Electricity Act and harmonise energy policies.
On financing, both organisations will leverage blended finance models to de-risk renewable energy projects, attract private capital, and strengthen the Rural Electrification Fund.
Additionally, they will jointly produce robust data on sustainable energy progress and run public engagement campaigns to drive policy support and consumer adoption of clean energy.
According to the partners, the initiative reflects UNDP’s commitment to locally driven, inclusive, and resilient development, as well as REA’s mandate to bring sustainable energy to unserved and underserved communities.
Both agencies expressed optimism that the collaboration would fast-track Nigeria’s journey towards universal access to clean energy and a greener economy.
Continue Reading

Trending