Opinion
In Defence Of Gender Parity
The male and female genders confirm of God’s creation. There is this age- long gender disparity in the world. And this disparity has caused degradation and maltreatment of the female gender which is contrary to creation ordination by God. The Biblical Creation account put it this way: And God said, let us make man in our image, after our likeness, and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air and over the cattle, and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. (Genesis 1:26-27).
God did not make any mistake in creating woman from man. Indeed, Adam and Eve did not misunderstand each other while living on earth as humans; even when they disobeyed God. The maltreatment of women as second-class or semi human beings is alien to God’s original account of creation. The male and female folks make mistakes or misbehave in the society. But, the moment the female folk makes mistake or misbehaves the society roars and condemns them.
Traditionally, the female gender has been made to suffer in the society by some obnoxious traditions. Some traditions in the world do not allow the women to become the he d or compound chief. Across the world, traditional factors had hampered the development of women for too long.
The Beijing Conference held in year 2000 in China, sparked awareness for women liberation across the world. It is obvious that society had a wrong mindset and perception against the female gender. In some tradition, women are perceived to be good in only home keeping which is not normal. Some women have intellectual capacity and ability to change the world.
Another problematic issue against the female gender in the society is custom and culture. Some cultural practices have hindered and frustrated the women. folk in the society. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, women were not allowed to drive cars. It was just recently that the law was amended for women to drive cars. Again, female genital mutilation is a barbaric practice. But it is being practised subtly in some African societies.
Religion is another subtle platform where women rights are denied and relegated to the background. There are some misconceptions and beliefs against the female gender. The advice of 1st Peter 3:7 is erroneously misconstrued. In the words of St. Peter, “Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life that your prayers be not hindered”. St. Peter advocated for family unity which is missing in the society today.
When the values of wives are not sustained by husbands in the home, how can they be supported in the larger society? Deborah and Huldah were prophetesses in the Bible who maintained their integrity and redirected their society in their time in public service. There is no need for gender disparity in Nigeria or African society or elsewhere in the world.
The female gender should not be treated with disdain in the society. Today, because of perceived injustice and maltreatment against the women folk, so many women folk, so many women-based associations have been formed to protect female gender in terms of abuse.
In this 21st Century, there is revolution of women development in all facets of life in the world. For instance, in Nigeria, women are working hard to realize the 35 percent affirmative action in political positions. Based on such agitation, the Rivers State Governor, Barr. Nyesom Wike, insisted that women should become vice chairmen of all the 23 local government councils in the state.
Without mincing words, today, there is no field of endeavour without the presence of women experts. The creation of gender disparity is an activity that can be corrected or redefined in the society. The female folk should be given their pride of place in the society.
Indeed, it is worthy to note that the problem of gender parity starts from the family unit. Therefore, female child should be treated with respect to avoid gender disparity. The society should see the female gender as an integral part of the society.
Indeed, without the female gender, the world would not move forward. Therefore, let the female gender be supported by the men folk for women to have a sense of belonging in the scheme of things in society, especially, the African society.
Ogwuonuonu wrote from Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News13 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Niger Delta12 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers11 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education12 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Education12 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News13 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
