Editorial
That The Nation’s Editorial On Wike
The sudden outbabbling of The Nation Newspaper against the Governor of Rivers State, Chief Nyesom Wike and the Rivers State Government for condemning the impunity and disregard to the rule of law by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in the discharge of its responsibility, is to say the least, exhibition of professional rascality.
Rivers State Governor, Chief Nyesom Wike had declared that no official of the State government would appear before the EFCC over the commission’s ‘politically motivated’ investigations until it approaches the Court of Appeal to set aside its 2007 judgement barring it from investigating the state.
This followed EFCC’s arrest of one of Rivers State’s bankers’ official, Zenith Bank’s Manager, ostensibly to explain the State’s transactions and withdrawals in the past three years. According to a statement signed by the Special Assistant to Governor Wike on Electronic Media, Simeon Nwakaudu, the Governor had described EFCC’s action as a political witch-hunt on Rivers State.
Accordingly, Wike had declared, “we cannot be intimidated”, noting that the media trial by the EFCC would amount to nothing as the state government was already aware of the commission’s antics before it published its so-called investigations.
Commenting on the development, The Nation Newspaper, established by a chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Senator Bola Tinubu, in its Editorial of Thursday, September 6, 2018 titled: “Wike’s Curious Audacity,” asked: “If EFCC can investigate other state governments, why should Rivers State Government be different?”
We are worried that The Nation Newspaper which is expected to be well-informed of democratic precepts particularly as it affects the management of state affairs, should feign ignorance that the trend and pattern of EFCC’s ‘investigations’ on finances of states are becoming ominous. That the commission’s searchlight is deliberately beamed on States seen to belong to opposition parties and tagged political enemies while those seen to be political allies are ignored, even when there are ample evidences to put them through the microscope, is most unfortunate.
Only recently, Benue State Government and Akwa Ibom State Government, two Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)-controlled States had their accounts frozen by the commission on the guise that their finances were being investigated. Interestingly, both States became targets shortly after remarkable re-alignment of the political leaderships and interests in the States. Also, Ekiti State Government, another PDP State, had been harassed time and again by the commission in the name of finance investigation until it was stopped by a court order.
Regrettably, the public sphere is usually awash with the news of arrests and freezing of accounts by EFCC, in a clear case of media trials without corresponding media frenzy on the ultimate outcome of the investigation in the end.
We expect The Nation Newspaper to have known that there are extant laws and constitutional provisions that guide the operations of outfits like the EFCC and that of state governments in Nigeria. And by law, it is the duty of the State Houses of Assembly which appropriate the finances of the States to investigate the funds of the States via their oversight functions.
While we agree with the fact that EFCC was set up by law with clear terms of reference, the commission is not above the laws of the land and must operate within the ambit of the Constitution and rule of law. The EFCC and its operatives must not allow themselves to be seen as an extension of the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led Federal Government that is bent on witch-hunting the opposition for cheap political reasons.
In fact, the commission must not be allowed to become a political attack dog that would be unleashed at real and imagined political enemies or opponents.
The Tide is at a loss over The Nation Newspaper’s backing of the EFCC’s move to investigate Rivers State’s finances even with the knowledge of a court of competent jurisdiction judgement which barred it from doing so. We, therefore, cannot agree more with Governor Wike that the EFCC must vacate the Court of Appeal’s ruling that neither the State’s finances nor its officials be probed pending when the judgement is set aside.
A Federal High Court had in its 2007 judgement declared that the EFCC lacks the power to investigate state governments as “that power resides with the State House of Assembly. By any stretch of imagination, the EFCC is not a state House of Assembly,” the court held.
Moreso, it is curious why this same commission, which wittingly turned a blind eye to the financial misappropriation charges levelled against the immediate past administration in the State after it was duly indicted by a competent panel of enquiry, will be eager to pounce on the present government based on spurious and trumped-up petition.
EFCC’s penchant to pick and choose which State to descend on while observing due process and rule of law in the breach smacks of deliberate intimidation and hounding of the perceived opponents of its principal. These, we believe, do not mean well for the country’s democracy, especially as 2019 elections draw near.
While we do not want to believe that The Nation Newspaper is backing the perceived use of the EFCC by the Presidency for political witch-hunt, we expect The Nation Newspaper to advise that the commission should be reined-in immediately, particularly, on the ill-advised move to lay siege on Rivers State, which is tantamount to undermining the authority of the judiciary.
Enough of EFCC’s flagrant impunity and abuse of the rule of law. The commission’s recklessness and over-zealousness must be checked before the country degenerates into anarchy. This is the position The Nation Newspaper should adopt to defend our democracy rather than promote impunity and reckless abuse of rule of law as exemplified by the EFCC.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
Rivers5 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News5 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics5 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured5 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
