Opinion
Politics, Patriotism And Patronage
A country that allows its rulers to revel with impunity and reckless abandon in the worst form of corruption and misrule, cannot hope to be blessed with the grace of light. – Late Chief Obafemi Awolowo.
Another period of increased political activities is about to begin and there is a need to remind Nigerians that good conditions do not come about through wrong or unjust decisions and actions. Nigerians have suffered enough in silence and there is a strong need to reverse the situation through some honest policies, choices and changes. In the Holy Book of Islam we are told that “tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter” (Sura II: 217). We have had enough of slaughter in the past 50 years arising from tumult and oppression, but let there be a change now.
A situation whereby politics becomes an act of promoting tumult, oppression and corrupt practices which lead to slaughter, because of poor management of the nation’s resources, should change for the better. Should over seventy percent of Nigerians continue to groan in agony while less than twenty percent of the population live in obscene opulence? Should politics not be practiced with good conscience and goodwill? Let there be a change now.
Does patriotism consist in enjoying government patronage and holding one sinecure after another from one regime to another? Are there not “patriotic” Nigerians lavishing the nation’s wealth in an unmerciful manner that can make the heart bleed? Must politics be reduced to a hide-and-seek activity whereby self-interest defines patriotism?
Patriotism is defined in terms of how much that an individual benefits from a prevailing patronage system. In this unique political system, honesty is not the best policy in statecraft, neither is prudence the best policy in economic matters. Talking about the Nigerian political situation, late Francis Ellah said: “Once imbalance is installed in a system or the framework of a state becomes lop-sided in favour of a visible majority ethnic group against all other groups combined, then the political air is ominously fouled up and the hell of tribal hostility is let loose on all fronts upon the state and the nation.”
One major reason which fuels and perpetuates corruption in Nigeria is the lop-sidedness of the Nigerian political structure, which also makes it difficult for genuine patriotism to become a national sentiment. A situation where some sections of the country have some feeling of estrangement (which is noticeably so) then there is no way that hostility would not rear its head. This lop-sided system manifests in several ways including patronage and sinecure, which are obvious corruption.
Corruption does not always involve monetary deals, but to install unproductive, unnecessary, duplicated administrative structures so as to provide jobs for political loyalists, can be called corruption also. A situation where everyone thinks himself sufficiently qualified for the task of governance solely on cash-and-carry basis, then that would not be a viable political culture. Politics should be about patriotism, sacrifice and service, rather than a business of sharing available resources. We have largely self-seeking adventurers who see politics as a gold-mine, even though a dangerous venture.
It is evident that oil politics is the driving force in governance, which has succeeded in producing the ugliest dare-devil and pig-headed adventures that this country has ever had. There is hardly anything else we hear about in the Nigerian polity than cases of large-scale frauds and corruption and one begins to wonder how the country is able to survive, considering the amounts of money involved in such cases. Even in the investigation and prosecution of the many corruption cases that have come to light, there is evidently the Nigerian factor at work which makes the anti-corruption crusade a mere travesty.
Whether we are aware of it or not, nation-building is a serious task which demands not just commitment, conviction and sacrifice, but more importantly nobility of soul. Late Chief Obafemi Awolowo would remind us that only the deep can call to the deep, meaning that nation-building is not a task that can be accomplished by interior and corrupt minds. In view of the scandals, frauds and corruption often associated with the Nigerian political class and regimes it would be difficult to say that the nation would have the blessing and grace of the light in our endeavours.
Let us recognize the fact that no matter what we do in secret and how clever we may be in our exploits, time usually unfolds what plighted cunning hides. If we are serious about the project of restructuring, there would be the need to provide a safe-landing for those who have looted the wealth and resources of this country in the past 50 years, otherwise they will sabotage every effort that would expose and penalise them.
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education4 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta4 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education4 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News4 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News4 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics4 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
