Opinion
Nigerian Universities And Admission Requirements
When the news of cancellation of post UME test by universities was released, many people, not excluding this writer, heaved a very big sigh of relief. The expression of joy on the faces of parents across the country, simply showed how bitter they hated to live with the trauma of post-UME test, also known as aptitude test or admission screening.
Apart from the stress parents and potential university candidates were subjected to under the aegis of undergoing universities admissions test, the financial involvement was, to say the least, unbearable to Nigerian university degree seekers.
Candidates were made to pay through their noses just to have their names enlisted for admissions into their choice areas of study, without minding the outcome of the so-called test which was usually computer-based.
The entire essence of adopting a computer-based approach to screen the successful JAMB candidates, was to actually ascertain the reliability of their acclaimed performances at the JAMB examination. This, to a very large extent, was designed to invalidate the efforts of JAMB fraudsters.
This whole effort of the university management in collaboration with the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board was an experiment, punctured by Nigerian fraudsters who would always aim at exploring avenues to perpetrate their fraudulent acts, irrespective of the system they have found themselves.
The post-UME screening suddenly lost its credibility as the ability of candidates to be successful in the exercise depended largely on their capability at meeting up their financial requirement to scale through. Many poor candidates and parents, resigned to fate as there would always be a way-out for the hopeless.
But then, many concerned citizens had called for the cancellation of the post-UME screening since the Joint Admissions and Matriculations exams are now computer based. They argued that it would amount to a duplication of efforts and tantamount to a waste of time, money and manpower.
They believed that for a candidate to weather the storm of JAMB examination via the computer system, he or she needs no further test to authenticate their qualification for admission into the university.
Without mincing words, the adoption of the computer-based approach by JAMB is, by extension, an elimination of fraud, thus the method alone validates the outcome of the exams which renders any further effort at screening the successful candidates by way of academic test unnecessary.
This is probably why the Federal Government deemed it imperative to abolish the post-UME screening system and subsequently placed sanction on any tertiary institution that may ask for money for any screening exercise. The government then approves only Senior Secondary School Certificate and JAMB results as pre-requisites for admission into Nigerian university
Unfortunately, parents who had expressed joy at the abolition of the former system, now seem to chant their woes at the requirement of the new system. They speculate that the new system would further encourage fraud at the ordinary level’s examinations since candidates must pass their ordinary level’s exams at one sitting and with high grades.
The writer is of the view that the recently approved method of screening for university admissions should be reviewed. Perhaps, a little reminiscence into the 1980s and 90’s admission approach may serve as a better guide. The only challenge of that era was the loss of confidence in the JAMB exams as candidates employed the use of marcenaries to pass their papers.
Now that there is an utmost reliability on the JAMB examination as having the potential to produce the right stock for university admissions, is it not better we emphasise on at least five credit passes in one’s core courses and English language and Mathematics, leaving performance in JAMBto determine the aptitude?
With the current requirements for ‘O’ level papers as a pre-requisite for admissions into Nigerian universities, I am afraid, curbing crime in Nigeria’s secondary education would remain a mirage.
Sylvia Thank-God-Amadi
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Politics2 days agoAPC Releases Adjusted Timetable For Nationwide Congresses, Convention
-
Sports5 days agoHammers Beat Burnley To Boost Survival Chances
-
Business1 day agoCustoms Seek Support To Curb Smuggling In Ogun
-
News1 day ago
Police Bust Kidnapping Syndicate In PH
-
Sports1 day ago
DG NIS Wants NSC Board Constituted, Seeks Increased In Funding
-
Sports2 days ago
Falcon Players Prepare For Title Defense
-
Sports1 day ago
NSC Disburses N200m Training Grants To 26 Athletes
-
Sports1 day ago
‘NTF Will Build On Davis Cup Success For Brighter Future’
