Opinion
The Church And Building Project
It can hardly be contested that Nigeria provides the classic example of Africa’s most ethnically segmented modern day country. At present, scholars are yet to agree on the total number of ethnic groups in Nigeria. They only extrapolated the various ethnic nationalities to be between two hundred and fifty and four hundred with diverse cultures, interest, sizes, distribution of power, influence and resources. The Africa’s most populous country, Nigeria is said to have more than five hundred and ten local languages and added to these is the religious pluralism.
It has to be noted from the outset that before the artificial creation of Nigeria by the British on1st January, 1914, which has been described as “mistake of 1914” and “geographically lopsided, ethnically absurd”, they did not consult the previously independent people. Worse still, the vast peoples compulsorily fused together were not well integrated. It was only government services that were amalgamated to satisfy their imperialistic motive. This resulted in the emergence of the North-South dichotomy in the dictionary of Nigeria’s national life. At the moment, the unilateral creation is responsible for many of the several debacles which are the bane of Nigeria as a federation.
It is common knowledge that Nigeria’s quest for nationhood has been under the assault of centrifugal forces such as lack of Nigerian based ideology, ethnic consciousness, religious bigotry, poverty, citizenship question, endemic corruption, clamour for resource control and self-determination, the Boko Haram menace, and so on since October 1st 1960 when Nigeria gained independence. At the root of all these were mutual distrust, intense competition rivalries and struggles over the modalities and power to control and/or share the distribution of political cum economic resources available in the nation among the desperate peoples. Having gone through all these, it necessary to forge sustainable nationhood in Nigeria by exploring other non-conflict methods to resolve the lingering and festering crises which often threaten the existence of the country. Given the strategic position occupy by the church, the leadership must be involved in the process of transforming Nigeria from a ‘mere geographical expression’ to an organic state where justice, equity and fair play will reign supreme.
It is thus necessary to know what the Nation building is all about. Obviously there are many definitions of a nation but let restrict ourselves to that which states that a nation refers to “the people of a territory united under a single government; country; state”. This applies to countries like Niger, Ghana, Zaire, and so on. Likewise, the term Nation building is the crave for nationhood – a political community – where the inhabitants will get equal access to the good things of life and where there will be intermingling of cultures in the economic, social and political systems.
However, the term ‘church’ here refers to the gospel of Jesus Christ as well as the Christian denominations. The word, Christian is a generic term coined from the word ‘Christ’. The word ‘Christ’ is a derivation from the Greek word ‘Christos’, which is akin to the Hebrew ‘Mashiah’, referring to the ‘anointed one’. Christianity which started as a Jewish religion is an offshoot of Judaism. It is a religion that is built on the life, teachings, belief and behaviour of Jesus Christ while on earth. Little surprise that His followers or those who behave like Him are often described as Christian that is, Christ-like.
It is discernable from the above discussion that nation building project is for all. And if left in the hands of the few (the elite), the project will continue to be an illusion. It is a fact of history that the church is at the forefront of the development of many nations, Nigeria inclusive. History tells us that Christianity brought literacy, the worship of only one God and the eradication of evil pagan practices. Christianity also impacted the lives of Nigerian’s through the building of orphanages, leprosiums, hospitals, maternity homes, dispensaries and clinics to see to the health needs of the people of Nigeria.
Today, the church has tremendously improved on its track record in the education sector. Most of the Christian Churches have established tertiary institutions to supplement the ones established by the government. In all, the over twenty four universities out of thirty eight private universities in Nigeria are owned by the Christian denominations. The church can do more in this regard and lead Nigeria out of the quagmire she often experience. This will be discussed under the following subheadings.
The church is an umbrella for all kinds of people. Today, all sorts of people, especially miracle seekers and the corrupt seek to exploit her. Such cramped attended church sessions like prayer, fasting, crusades, worship services, and so on can be used by church leaders as platforms to teach and preach anti-corruption messages. The worshippers should be taught to desist from all dishonest or illegal behaviours that will not bring glory to God.
Christians and Christian leaders should purge themselves of all dimensions and implications of corrupt acts and practices and stand boldly to use Bible passages like Prov. 17:23; 29:4, Eccl. 7:7, Is. 5:23, Lk. 3:4 etc to eradicate corruption from the system. Our business brethren should constantly be reminded of God’s position on corruption as stated in Lev. 19:36 you should have just balanced, just weights, a just ephah, and a just inn. For our Christian Politicians, it should be made known that God frowns at double standards, material acquisition, indiscipline, injustice, intimidation, oppression, Nepotism, bribery and greed. We must note that corruption has a disastrous effects as exemplifies in the cases of Ahab (1 Kings 21:1-29) and Gehazi (2 Kings 5:1-27).
UeBari-Samuel is a student of Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, PH
N-Ue, UeBari-Samuel
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education3 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education3 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Politics3 days ago2027: RIVERS GUBER CANDIDATES SIGN CHARTER TO PRIORITIZE CITIZENS’ DEMANDS
-
Politics3 days ago2027: South-East Govs Insist On Tinubu’s Re-election
