Connect with us

Politics

On Supreme Court Ouster Of Five Governors

Published

on

Democracy simply means meeting the wishes of the people. It is a government of the people by the people for the people, while the judiciary, another arm of government is placed in a way to strengthen  democratic institutions by way of interpreting the law and to re-positioning and re-direct the process.

Democracy in Africa has not sufficiently  helped the progress and development of the continent.

The people of Africa are yet to start choosing their leaders despite the fact that most countries in the continent practise democracy.

The people are yet to have the opportunity to elect their leaders.  Leaders in some countries in Africa have used the process to sit tight in power and in government while some change the rules at the middle of the game.

Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe has held on to power for many years is a classical example.

The present President of Senegal whose tenure expires this year after being in office for two tenures of over eight years has succeeded in amending the electotal law of that country to suit his ambition to remain in power.

Those in government in Nigeria, the acclaimed most populated black nation in the world have tried both in the military era and civilian rules to stay put, but such attempts have failed due to complexity of the country and the people.

Last Friday, was another test for democracy in Nigeria where some governors whose intention   to stay put in power longer than their allowed tenure were terminated by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court in its ruling terminated the tenures of Governors of Ibrahim Idris (Kogi), Murtala Nyako (Adamawa), Timipre Sylva (Bayesla), Aliyu Wamako (Sokoto) and Liyel Imoke (Cross River).

The Apex Court declared that there was no reasons  whatsoever for them to stay beyond last May 29, having first taken oaths of allegiance on May 29, 2007.

A seven member Panel of the Supreme Court presided over by the Chief  Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Dahiru Musdapher delievered the judgement in an appeal filed by the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) governorship candidate in Adamawa State, Rtd Brig. General Baba Marwa and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

The Apex Court dismissed the preliminary objections raised by the Governors and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the appeal.

The court in giving its ruling explained that no elected officers under the 1999 Constitution can remain in office beyond four years.

In its view that since the acts performed during the period prior to the nullification of the election remain valid and subsisting and the same persons contested and won the re-run election thereby taking another set of oaths and since what was nullified was the election, the oath they took in 2007 remain valid and the starting point in calculating their four years tenure in office as Governors of their respective states.

The Court stretched further that the 1999 constitution does not envisage a tenure exceeding four years by the same person who took the first oath following the election which kick started the tenure.

Legal experts have expressed divergent views about the verdict sacking the five governors from office.

Prof. Itse Sagey (SAN) said the judgement was a healthy one and that it will help set a moral tone for good practice of democracy.

Sagey said apart from the fact that the judgement would set a moral tone for democracy, it would as well discourage politicians and those who would want to sit tight in government and power from rigging elections.

According to him, people should not be made to benefit from their fraud and criminality.

Also in his own contribution on the issue, a Port Harcourt based Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Sabastine Tar Hon said the sack of the five governors by the Supreme Court would be mere academic exercise for those who have contrary views on the judgement.

Hon  said although the decision is final, all parties must comply with, either favourable or not.

According to him, “the Supreme Court may have to revisit the decision some day. It was the same Supreme Court that held in 2009, in the case of the Labour Party (LP) versus Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), that when an election is annulled and re-run ordered, both the election and the oath taken are gone”.

“In this case, the original oaths the governors had taken ceased to exist, when they went in for fresh elections and subsequently took fresh oaths of office, there cannot be two oaths in one tenure, he said.

Hon however, said since the Supreme Court is the conscience of the nation which has the jurisprudential powers to give even policy decisions, we must be bound by it.

He said any contrary opinion is merely an academic   exercise and urged Nigerians and politicians to always give peace a chance in order to move the country forward.

The issue of elongation came to limelight in 2007, when the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Governor of Anambra State, Chief Peter Obi.

Chief Obi who became Governor at the middle of the tenure after obtaining judgment from Appeal tribunal against the sitting Governor then, Dr. Chris Ngige of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). The judgment was to allow the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) candidate, Chief Obi the opportunity to serve and complete his 4 years tenure.

This became the reasons even though an election was conducted in Anambra in 2007, and by INEC and Chief Andy Uba was sworn in, Obi was asked to return to the Government House and complete this tenure as governor.

Many including Hon. Chinyere Igwe believed that the case of Chief Peter Obi versus INEC was different. He said Nigerian politicians  always explore every opportunity that comes their way.

Hon. Chinyere Igwe, a former member of House of Representatives, said  last Friday judgement was in order since the effected governors had served four years in office.

According to him, I see no legal backing why they should stay in office more than the stipulated time frame.

Igwe, a legal practitioner, commended the Supreme Court for its wisdom, adding that the verdict will surely reposition and strengthen democracy in Nigeria.

Continue Reading

Politics

Senate Extends 2025 Budget Implementation To Sept. 30

Published

on

Senate has again approved a three-month extension implementation period for capital component of the 2025 Appropriation Act from June 30 to Sept 30.

This followed the adoption of a motion moved by Senate Chief Whip, Mohammed Monguno (APC- Borno) at plenary yesterday.

Monguno, moving the motion, said the extension became necessary given the unutilsed substantial funds released to Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) for implementation of projects under the 2025 budget.

According to him, delays caused by procurement processes, project implementation challenges and administrative procedures had slowed the execution of several critical government projects.

Monguno said many strategic projects across key sectors of the economy were already at advanced stages of completion and required additional time for execution, certification and payment.

“Failure to extend the implementation period of the 2025 Appropriation Act may result in the abandonment of critical projects, the wastage of already committed public resources and the disruption of ongoing government interventions,” he said.

He argued that some allocations contained in the budget might not be accommodated in subsequent appropriation cycles if the implementation window expired.

This, he said would create funding gaps and ultimately undermine development objectives.

He said that extending the validity period of the budget would improve budget performance, facilitate the efficient utilisation of released funds and support economic growth.

“Granting a further extension of the implementation period is in the national interest and will ensure value for money in public expenditure,” he said.

Chairman, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Sen. Solomon Adeola (APC-Ogun), supporting the motion, explained that the extension was specifically targeted at the capital component of the budget.

According to him, when President Bola Tinubu presented the 2025 budget to the National Assembly, there is an understanding that 30 per cent of the budget implementation will be completed by March 31, while the remaining 70 per cent will be rolled into the 2026 budget.

Adeola said that the implementation timeline was not fully achieved, prompting the National Assembly to earlier extend the budget’s lifespan to June 30.

“While we were passing the 2026 budget, due to the non-implementation of that promise, we were forced to extend the budget to June 30,” he said.

He said although payments had commenced, significant obligations remained outstanding.

“There is a need to extend this budget beyond June 30 to September 30, by then, we are hopeful that the outstanding 30 per cent will have been paid in full, while implementation of the components transferred to the 2026 budget can commence.”

Adeola urged senators to support the extension to ensure proper implementation of projects and prevent disruptions to government programmes.

Sen.Victor Umeh  (NDC-Anambra), who seconded the motion cited the need to sustain the execution of projects captured under the 2025 Appropriation Act.

“In view of the need to sustain the continued execution of the projects covered in the 2025 Appropriation Act, as amended, I hereby second the motion,” Umeh said.

Following deliberations, Senate President Akpabio put the proposal to a voice vote and it was overwhelmingly adopted by the lawmakers..

Akpabio in his remarks said the decision was necessary to prevent interruptions in payments and project execution.

“The payment would have stopped halfway if this was not done,” he said.

The Senate President commended the Chairman of the Appropriations Committee and other lawmakers involved in handling the matter.

He directed that the Senate’s resolution be transmitted to the executive for implementation.

“Accordingly, the resolution of the Senate is being communicated to the Executive that the 2025 Appropriation Act has been extended to Sept 30.

The National Assembly had earlier extended the implementation period of the 2025 budget to June 30, following delays in the release and utilisation of capital funds.

Senate, thereafter, adjourned plenary to July 7.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Reps Elect Bayelsa Lawmaker, Agbedi, As Minority Leader

Published

on

The member representing Sagbama/Ekeremor Federal Constituency of Bayelsa State, Frederick Agbedi, yesterday emerged as the new Minority Leader of the House of Representatives.

Agbedi’s emergence follows the resignation of former Minority Leader, Kingsley Chinda of Rivers State, who recently defected from the Peoples Democratic Party to the ruling All Progressives Congress, creating a vacuum in the leadership structure of the opposition caucus in the Green Chamber.

His nomination was contained in a letter transmitted to the Speaker of the House, Tajudeen Abbas, by the minority caucus during plenary, yesterday.

In the letter, the caucus announced that its members had reached a consensus on the replacement of vacant principal offices allocated to opposition parties in the House.

Abbas, while reading the letter said, “The election of the House of Representatives, Federal Republic of Nigeria, the minority members of the 10th Assembly hereby unanimously nominate the following members by consensus to fill the vacant positions of the minority in the parliament.

“Number one is the Minority Leader, Hon Frederick Agbedi.

“Number two is the position of minority whip, and the person they have endorsed is Hon Mansur Soro (APM, Bauchi).

“The last but not the least is my brother from the North-West, Hon Abdussamad Dasuki (ADC, Sokoko) for the position of Deputy Minority Leader.

“Honourable colleagues, today the body of principal officers is complete, and I want to seize this opportunity on behalf of the whole entire House to congratulate the three people and to wish them all the best in their new positions.”

With the development, Agbedi assumes the responsibility of coordinating opposition lawmakers in the House and articulating the position of minority parties on legislative matters before the chamber.

A ranking lawmaker and one of the longest-serving members of the House, Agbedi has represented Sagbama/Ekeremor Federal Constituency since 2011.

His appointment is expected to strengthen the voice of the opposition caucus at a time when defections and realignments continue to reshape the political landscape ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Also announced was the emergence of Hon Mansur Soro of the Allied Peoples Movement as Minority Whip and Hon Abdussamad Dasuki of the African Democratic Congress as Deputy Minority Leader, completing the minority leadership structure in the 10th House.

Speaking after the announcement, Abbas congratulated the newly appointed principal officers and pledged the cooperation of the House leadership.

“The leadership of the House will work with them assiduously in ensuring that we achieve our legislative agenda objectives of this very important 10th Assembly,” he added.

The emergence of the new minority leadership comes amid recent changes to the House Rules governing the selection of principal officers. The amendments, which introduced fresh eligibility requirements, have generated debate within opposition ranks and influenced the contest for key leadership positions.

Shortly after the announcement, a lawmaker from Imo State who had been nominated for the position of Minority Leader last week, Ikenga Ugochinyere, formally withdrew from the race.

He cited the amended House Rules and the new eligibility criteria for principal officers as the basis for his decision.

The latest appointments are expected to restore stability within the opposition bloc following weeks of uncertainty triggered by Chinda’s defection and the subsequent scramble for leadership positions.

Political observers believe the new leadership team will face the immediate challenge of forging unity among lawmakers drawn from different opposition parties while providing effective legislative scrutiny of the executive and the ruling APC-dominated parliament.

For the PDP, which remains the largest opposition party in the House despite recent defections, Agbedi’s emergence is seen as a strategic move aimed at maintaining cohesion within the minority caucus and strengthening its influence in parliamentary proceedings.

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Don’t Risk Your Legacy, Citizen Begs Jonathan Against 2027 Presidential Race

Published

on

A  social commentator in Bauchi State, David Adenuga has urged former President, Dr Goodluck Jonathan, to ignore the growing calls for his return to the presidential race, warning that some political actors pushing the idea could tarnish his legacy.

In a letter titled, “An Open Letter to Former President Goodluck Jonathan,” the observer said Dr Jonathan should be careful not to allow himself to be drawn into partisan calculations driven by ambition rather than national interest.

“I write this letter as a concerned Nigerian who respects the role you played in Nigeria’s democracy and the peaceful example you set for the country,” he stated.

He cautioned the former president against allowing himself to be used by what he described as desperate political interests.

“I believe this is the time to protect the good name and legacy you have built over the years. You should not allow yourself to be used by desperate political elements who may be more interested in their own ambitions than in the future of Nigeria,” the letter read.

The Social Commentator further warned Dr Jonathan to be wary of those advocating for his comeback, claiming many of them were previously opposed to his administration.

“Many of those calling for your return today were your antagonists, those who frustrated your government back then. You should be careful not to become a pawn in a game designed by others or else they will stain your white with their ‘roforofo’,” he said.

He maintained that Dr Jonathan’s legacy remains defined by his decision to concede defeat in 2015, which he described as a landmark moment in Nigeria’s democratic history.

“Your legacy was built through years of public service and your decision to put the country’s peace above personal ambition at a critical moment in Nigeria’s history. That legacy should not be put at risk because of the desperation of a few politicians,” he added.

Mr Adenuga also alleged that some of the promoters of Dr Jonathan’s return have lost credibility in the public space.

“The truth is that some of the people pushing you to contest have already damaged their own reputations. They should not be allowed to stain your legacy with their soiled hands. What they could not achieve on their own should not be pursued through your name and goodwill,” he stressed.

He concluded by urging the former president to remain above political manoeuvring and protect his place in history.

“History has been kind to you. Preserve that honour and remain above the political games of those who want to use your name for their own purposes,” he wrote.

Recall that former President Goodluck Jonathan recently emerged as the presidential candidate of the Kabiru Turaki-led Interim National Working Committee of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) following a special convention held in Abuja, where delegates ratified his nomination ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Continue Reading

Trending