Editorial
FG And Security Challenges
Since the last four months, the security situation in the country, especially in the North Eastern part, has been a serious cause for concern to many law-abiding Nigerians. Indeed, the spectre of bomb blasts and attacks on innocent Nigerians, resulting in colossal loss of lives, maiming, as well as destruction of property worth millions of Naira, are taking a frightening dimension.
Only last week, President Goodluck Jonathan summoned an emergency meeting with security top brass in the Presidential Villa, Abuja, with the aim of putting every machinery in place to checkmate the spate of bomb blasts and violent attacks on the citizens, particularly on government officials and institutions. The meeting came on the heels of a suicide bomb attack on Police Headquarters in Abuja, recently, by a group, allegedly linked to a fundamentalist religious sect, Boko Haram.
Before that daring incident, a number of dastardly bomb blasts had been unleashed on unsuspecting Nigerians and government institutions across some states in the North. On October 1, 2010, as Nigerians were celebrating the golden jubilee anniversary of the independence of the country, twin bomb blasts hit locations near the Eagle Square venue of the national event in Abuja, killing at least, 11 persons, and injuring some 35 others. Since then, bomb blasts have been recorded in other cities.
Specifically, in March, 2011, after a political campaign rally in Suleja, Niger State, a car bomb had exploded near the venue of the rally, causing stampede and severe damage to buildings nearby. Similarly, on the eve of the botched April 2, 2011 National Assembly elections, a bomb had detonated at the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) building, killing innocent Nigerians, including volunteer members of the National Youth Service Corps, recruited by the election umpire to conduct the April polls.
Between then and now, series of bomb blasts have ripped off buildings, killing law-abiding citizens, and raised tension across the land. In Zuba, within the precinct of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Zaria in Kaduna State, Mugadishu Barracks, Abuja, and a plethora of other explosions that had killed many in Borno State, are clear cases which quickly come to mind. From available records, Boko Haram has claimed responsibility for virtually all the bomb attacks from last March to the most recent attack on an eatery in Maiduguri, the Borno State capital, last Monday.
Boko Haram, we understand, is a fundamentalist Islamic sect demanding, the establishment of Sharia as the official legal system in 12 states in the North, an end to secular education system, and a government system that professes Islamism as fundamental principle of governance, among others. In fact, Boko Haram elements claim not to recognize democratic governments and institutions, and insists on extirpating any semblance of representative democracy in the North. They also want to eliminate the police, and other para-military institutions and personnel.
The Tide feels particularly worried at the level of sophistication, strategic deployment of weapons, mode of delivery and execution of the series of bomb attacks, and the daring impunity with which members of Boko Haram have carried out their uncanny and unpatriotic campaign against the state. To say the least, the Boko Haram tactics and strategy are serious threats to the security of Nigerians and the territorial integrity of the nation. Indeed, we are ashamed at the successful execution of the suicide bomb attack on the headquarters of the nation’s security agency. We are sad that the epicenter of agency responsible for the protection of lives and property of Nigerians was so masterfully attacked and police officers serving the nation killed by common criminals.
While we expect that every citizen has a right to profess his or her religion, demand and get his or her rights to good education, high quality healthcare delivery, shelter, employment, and security guarantees in an independent nation such as ours, we also feel that such rights must be gained in a decent fashion. But it is particularly important to remind perpetrators of the festering mayhem of the immutable fact that their rights end where other Nigerians’ rights begin.
For us, therefore, to canvass amnesty for such group of persons, who have not in any way requested for government’s olive branch or shown remorse for their acts of terrorism and treason against the Nigerian state, as some few elements have surreptitiously done, is unpatriotic and unnecessary. The presidential amnesty granted Niger Delta militants by the Federal Government was necessitated by the fact that the struggle was meaningful and anchored on the need to develop the region, engineer political inclusiveness, and promote justice, equity and fair-play within the polity.
This is why The Tide supports the Federal Government’s present joint military strategy as a means of crushing the menace of Boko Haram. We say so because we do not see the desire to further any reasonable and development-driven ideas and demands by Boko Haram. In fact, their demands are crassly antithetical to development, progress, peace and security.
We, therefore, insist that government must do everything within its powers to suppress the rising tide of violence, bomb blasts, unwarranted killings, maiming and destruction of property of law-abiding Nigerians in any part of the country. The joint military task force must rise to the occasion, and quell this tasteless menu served Nigerians. The police must also swing into action, arrest and prosecute those directly or indirectly linked to the spate of insecurity in the land, so as to serve as a deterrent to any criminal minds, planning a new offensive anywhere in the country.
The time has come for the security agencies in this country to truly show that they are on top of the security situation. This is the only way we can beat our chests to say ‘Nigeria is foreign investors’ choice destination’, in Africa. Otherwise, the government’s vision of making Nigeria one of the 20 largest economies in the world by 2020 could be a huge pipe dream. The security challenges are real, and the government must face them frontally. This is the truth!
It began as a seemingly minor in- flight disagreement. Comfort Emmason, a passenger on an Ibom Air flight from Uyo to Lagos, reportedly failed to switch off her mobile phone when instructed by the cabin crew. What should have been a routine enforcement of safety regulations spiralled into a physical confrontation, sparking a national debate on the limits of airline authority and the rights of passengers.
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) wasted no time in condemning the treatment meted out to Emmason. In a strongly worded statement, the body described the incident as “a flagrant violation of her fundamental human rights” and called for a thorough investigation into the conduct of the airline staff. The NBA stressed that while passengers must adhere to safety rules, such compliance should never be extracted through intimidation, violence, or humiliation.
Following the altercation, Emmason found herself arraigned before a Magistrate’s Court and remanded at Kirikiri Maximum Security Prison, a location more commonly associated with hardened criminals than with errant passengers. In a surprising turn of events, the Federal Government later dropped all charges against her, citing “overriding public interest” and concerns about due process.
Compounding her woes, Ibom Air initially imposed a lifetime ban preventing her from boarding its aircraft. That ban has now been lifted, following mounting public pressure and calls from rights groups for a more measured approach. The reversal has been welcomed by many as a step towards restoring fairness and proportionality in handling such disputes.
While her refusal to comply with crew instructions was undeniably inappropriate, questions linger about whether the punishment fit the offence. Was the swift escalation from verbal reminder to physical ejection a proportionate response, or an abuse of authority? The incident has reignited debate over how airlines balance safety enforcement with respect for passenger rights.
The Tide unequivocally condemns the brutal and degrading treatment the young Nigerian woman received from the airline’s staff. No regulation, however vital, justifies the use of physical force or the public shaming of a passenger. Such behaviour is antithetical to the principles of customer service, human dignity, and the rule of law.
Emmason’s own defiance warrants reproach. Cabin crew instructions, especially during boarding or take-off preparations, are not mere suggestions; they are safety mandates. Reports suggest she may have been unable to comply because of a malfunctioning power button on her device, but even so, she could have communicated this clearly to the crew. Rules exist to safeguard everyone on board, and passengers must treat them with due seriousness.
Nigerians, whether flying domestically or abroad, would do well to internalise the importance of orderliness in public spaces. Adherence to instructions, patience in queues, and courteous engagement with officials are hallmarks of civilised society. Disregard for these norms not only undermines safety but also projects a damaging image of the nation to the wider world.
The Emmason affair is not an isolated case. Former Edo State Governor and current Senator, Adams Oshiomhole, once found himself grounded after arriving late for an Air Peace flight. Witnesses alleged that he assaulted airline staff and ordered the closure of the terminal’s main entrance. This is hardly the conduct expected of a statesman.
More recently, a Nollywood-worthy episode unfolded at Abuja’s Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, involving Fuji icon “King”, Wasiu Ayinde Marshal, popularly known as KWAM1. In a viral video, he was seen exchanging heated words with officials after being prevented from boarding an aircraft.
Events took a dangerous turn when the aircraft, moving at near take-off speed, nearly clipped the 68-year-old musician’s head with its wing. Such an occurrence points to a serious breach of airport safety protocols, raising uncomfortable questions about operational discipline at Nigeria’s gateways.
According to accounts circulating online, Wasiu had attempted to board an aircraft while he was carrying an alcoholic drink and refused to relinquish it when challenged. His refusal led to de-boarding, after which the Aviation Minister, Festus Keyamo, imposed a six-month “no-fly” ban, citing “unacceptable” conduct.
It is deeply concerning that individuals of such prominence, including Emmason’s pilot adversary, whose careers have exposed them to some of the most disciplined aviation environments in the world, should exhibit conduct that diminishes the nation’s reputation. True leadership, whether in politics, culture, or professional life, calls for restraint and decorum, all the more when exercised under public scrutiny.
Most egregiously, in Emmason’s case, reports that she was forcibly stripped in public and filmed for online circulation are deeply disturbing. This was an act of humiliation and a gross invasion of privacy, violating her right to dignity and falling short of the standards expected in modern aviation. No person, regardless of the circumstances, should be subjected to such degrading treatment.
Ibom Air must ensure its staff are trained to treat passengers with proper decorum at all times. If Emmason had broken the law, security personnel could have been called in to handle the matter lawfully. Instead, her ordeal turned into a public spectacle. Those responsible for assaulting her should face prosecution, and the airline should be compelled to compensate her. Emmason, for her part, should pursue legal redress to reinforce the principle that justice and civility must prevail in Nigeria’s skies.