Politics
EFCC And 2011 Polls
Recently, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had submitted an advisory list containing names of prominent politicians, former and serving public officers, alleged to have one case or another pending before various courts in the country.
The list contained at least 100 names with 40 prominent politicians whom the commission said should be barred from running for elective offices in the forthcoming 2011 elections.
The EFCC’s intention as speculated, may not be unconnected with a purported pre-emptive measure to stop or dashing the hope of some politicians with ambition to contest election in 2011.
The list had generated furore and negative reactions from prominent citizens in the country. Some believed that EFCC has become political tool in the hands of privileged government officials as instrument of intimidation against perceived political opponents.
The Chief of Staff to the Rivers State Government House, Hon. Nyesom Wike, whose name was conspicuously mentioned said: “it is a political vendetta.
Some citizens also saw the EFCC are institution and instrument poised to witch hunt perceived political opponents that refused to tow their political ideology.
This no doubt was said to be the ugly face of the commission under the erstwhile chairman, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu.
The them EFCC chairman, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu’s similar advisory list caused serious political uproar prior to the 2007 general elections.
The dust generated a number of controversial tendencies with the disqualification of the PDP governorship candidate in Rivers State now incumbent Governor, Rt Hon. Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi, Chief Peter Okocha, Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) governorship candidate in Delta State and former vice president, Alhaji Abubakar Atiku, among others.
With determination and courage, they fought their cases to the Supreme Court where the Supreme Court judgments gave them victory at the end of the day.
However, the questions agitating the minds of concerned Nigerians are whether the EFCC has such powers to stop any politician from contesting the forthcoming election based on the advisory list?
Will the 64 registered political parties in Nigeria accept the advisory list to act upon it thereof?
Is EFCC now usurping the constitutional functions of the law courts as to stop candidates without any conviction by the court?
However, perusing the law setting up the anti graft agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment Act 2004), the EFCC was charged with among others functions, the duties of investigation of all financial crimes including advance fee fraud, money laundering, counterfeiting, illegal charge transfers, future market fraud, fraudulent encashment of negotiable instruments, computer credit card fraud, contract scam etc.
Also, the EFCC shall adopt any measures to identify, trace, freeze, confiscate or seize proceeds derived from terrorist activities, economic and financial crimes related offences or the properties, the value of which corresponds to such proceeds.
Again, EFCC has such function of the examination and investigation of all reported cases of economic and financial crimes with a view to identifying individuals, corporate bodies or groups. From the legal perspective therefore, EFCC was not charged with the responsibility of stopping any candidate from contesting elections or to compile any advisory list to the political parties.
A prominent legal practitioner based in Port Harcourt, Barr. Awanen Jas, said the EFCC lacked the power to advise political parties on whom they should endorse for elections.
The legal luminary added that until a person is convicted by a law court, nobody has the right to stop a person from standing for election.
“EFCC has no powers under the law establishing the anti-graft agency to stop any aspirant”, he declares.
Also speaking to The Tide, an Attorney at law of the OLORI EGBE & Co Port Harcourt law office, Olubisi Mikail Afolabi, Esq, said the political parties should disregard the EFCC’s advisory list as the agency cannot constitute itself unto a court of law to stop any candidate vying for elective position.
Mikail Afolabi added that it is only court of law of competent jurisdiction having found any politician guilty of corruption and upon conviction can such politician be stopped from contesting election and not mere EFCC’s advisory list.
Also speaking to The Tide exclusively, in Port Harcourt, the Chief of staff to the Rivers State Governor and former chairman, Obio/Akpor local government area, Chief Ezebunwo Nyesom Wike, whose name was among the names on the EFCC advisory list faulted the inclusion of his name by the anti-graft agency in the advisory list to the political parties, said that he has no case to answer before the anti-graft agency.
He stated that EFCC should not be a political tool to be used to witch- hunt politicians with integrity and willingness to serve their constituency.
Chief Wike added that EFCC wrongly included his name in the advisory list of politicians having cases pending against them in court.
The Chief of Staff emphasised that the case between him and the EFCC which started in 2008, originating from his arraignment by the EFCC before Abuja High Court and then to the Court of Appeal Abuja, presided over by His Lordship Justice Ayobode Olokulo-Sodipe, where the Appeal Court ruled in his favour by quashing such criminal case against him.
He further explained that from March 2009, when the Court of Appeal discharged and acquitted him of any wrong doing, the EFCC has not appealed against that judgment or any case against him to warrant his name being listed by the commission.
However, a Senior Lecturer at the University of Port Harcourt, Dr Ishmael Guorima, had a contrary opinion. He said the EFCC’s advisory list is timely to the political parties to be careful with certain candidate being considered to be fielded for elective position.
The senior lecturer said the EFCC’s advisory list is a welcome development and a clear departure of the modus operadi of EFCC under Malam Nuhu Ribadu.
He said the list to the political parties is to advise the parties that, “please they should look before they leap in fielding candidates”.
However, the various political parties have the discretionary power to field any candidate they consider as their choice, if such a candidate wins the primaries of the parties.
It is the consensus opinion that EFCC should be guided by law in its operations to avoid being used as political tool thereby defeat the noble objective of its primary responsibilities of fighting corruption.
Philip-Wuwu Okparaji
Politics
Senate Defends Passage Of State Police Bill
The Senate has defended the passage of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) (State Police) Bill, 2026, saying the proposed creation of state police is driven by national consensus and the country’s security needs rather than political considerations.
The Red Chamber passed the bill last Wednesday after more than two-thirds of senators voted in support.
In a statement issued yesterday by the Directorate of Media and Public Affairs, Office of the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele described the bill as “a child of necessity and not of political expediency as well as a product of national consensus and not of cynicism.”
The senate leader said the proposal to establish state police was a matter of urgent public importance that could not be delayed because of political interests, given the country’s security challenges.
He explained that the proposal did not originate recently but emerged from memoranda submitted to the Senate Ad-hoc Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution.
According to him, the proposal underwent extensive consultations and rigorous scrutiny because of its sensitive nature.
Bamidele said the National Assembly consulted widely with the Executive, the Nigeria Governors’ Forum, the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria, the leadership of the Nigeria Police and other stakeholders before passing the bill.
He added that during the public hearings conducted across the six geopolitical zones in July 2025, participants overwhelmingly supported the creation of state police.
“At each level of our consultation, nearly all stakeholders embraced the State Police Bill in the light of stark realities we are facing today,” he said.
The Senate leader noted that recommendations from the Nigeria Police contributed to the bill, particularly on accountability and oversight mechanisms aimed at preventing abuse of state police by political actors.
According to him, the police’s support for the proposal underscores its national significance in tackling insecurity at the state and local levels.
Bamidele also said the bill received broad bipartisan backing in both chambers of the National Assembly.
“Even though the APC is the majority, there are members of opposition parties — PDP, ADC, NDC and Labour Party — that exercised their discretion in favour of the Bill, mainly in the national interest and not on parochial basis.
“In the Senate, for instance, 84 out of 109 members voted clause by clause in support of the Bill. This accounted for 77.06 per cent approval at the Senate alone,” he said.
He argued that national security should transcend political affiliations, saying political actors in other countries often set aside partisan interests to support initiatives that strengthen security.
Bamidele called on opposition parties to contribute constructive ideas that would promote peace and stability, adding that they have a responsibility to offer alternatives that would strengthen the country.
“Even when they disagree on some grounds, they are under obligations to provide credible and useful ideas that can make our nation better and greater. Unfortunately, they have not passed this critical test of opposition democracy,” he said.
News
Probe N6.3bn Constituency Funds Or Face Legal Action, SERAP Tells Akpabio, Abbas
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to refer allegations of the diversion or non-accounting of over ?6.3 billion in constituency project funds to anti-corruption agencies for investigation and possible prosecution.
The group also urged the National Assembly leadership to ensure that anyone found culpable is prosecuted where sufficient admissible evidence exists, while all diverted or unaccounted public funds are recovered and paid into the treasury.
In a letter dated June 27, 2026, and signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP said the allegations were contained in the Auditor-General of the Federation’s 2022 Annual Report, published on September 9, 2025.
The organisation disclosed this in a statement signed and released by Oluwadare, yesterday.
SERAP also asked Akpabio and Abbas to disclose the identities of contractors and companies, including their shareholders and beneficial owners, that allegedly received constituency project funds but failed to execute the projects.
It gave the National Assembly seven days to act on its recommendations, warning that it would institute legal proceedings should the legislature fail to respond.
“We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel you and the National Assembly to comply with our request in the public interest,” the letter stated.
It said, “The allegations involve several federal ministries, departments and agencies, including the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON); the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Volm; the Federal Polytechnic, Udana; the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP); and the National Institute of Legislative and Democratic Studies (NILDS).
“The Auditor-General identified numerous cases of payments into private bank accounts, contracts awarded without due process, payments for contracts not executed or services not rendered, undocumented expenditures, inflated contracts, procurement irregularities and failures to account for public funds, recommending in each case that the funds be recovered and remitted to the treasury.
“According to the 2022 audited report, contained in pages 367 to 396, the Environmental Health Registration Council of Nigeria (EHORECON or Council) Abuja paid over ‘N22 million [N22,944,565.16] into the private account of some members of staff of the Council from the Constituency Projects Fund Account.
“There ‘was no evidence of the utilization of the funds and no explanations on the purpose for the payment of such amount into the individual accounts.”
SERAP added, “The Council (EHORECON) also in 2021 ‘awarded suspicious consultancy contracts of over N12 million [N12,030,818.29] for the development of Modern Abattoirs in Kebbi State and the supervision of 7 projects in Kebbi, Jigawa, and Headquarters Abuja.
“The money was to ‘produce bills of quantity, architectural design, structural design, mechanical design, and electrical designs for the contracts and supervision.’ But ‘the ‘items could not be found.’”
Altogether, SERAP said the Auditor-General’s 2022 report alleged EHORECON paid more than ?1.8 billion in constituency project funds through questionable transactions.
For the Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Vom, SERAP said the institution “in 2022 reportedly ‘paid over N279 million [N279,700,500.00] to 3 contractors to empower and train youths in selected vocational areas in Borgu and Kontagora, Niger State, train women and youths in entrepreneurship in Niger East Senatorial District and to train youths and women in agro production and self-reliance in Barki Ladi/Riyom Federal Constituency, Plateau State.
“But the money was paid to the contractors without any document.’”
Other irregularities involving the college include another ?279.7 million in mobilisation fees allegedly paid without documentation, and more than ?629.4 million paid to unqualified contractors for various constituency projects without evidence of due process, contract advertisements or details of the contractors.
SERAP further alleged that the Auditor-General’s report identified multiple financial irregularities involving the Federal Polytechnic, Ukana, Akwa Ibom State, including over ?407 million allegedly paid as mobilisation fees without supporting documents, more than ?399 million paid to unqualified contractors, contracts allegedly inflated by over ?192 million, over ?279 million paid for projects not fully executed, ?50 million allegedly paid for an unexecuted borehole project, and more than ?83 million disbursed without the required documentation or approvals.
It also alleged that NAPTIP reportedly irregularly awarded contracts worth over ?21.8 million, paid more than ?176.8 million for logistics and consultancy services without supporting documents, and disbursed over ?89.6 million and ?4.4 million for projects that were allegedly not executed.
The report also alleged that NILDS failed to submit audited financial statements for 2012 to 2022, did not remit over ?15 million in stamp duties, and spent ?1.6 million without authorisation from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.
SERAP said the report recommended the recovery of the affected funds and their remittance to the treasury.
It argued that corruption in constituency projects disproportionately affects poor and vulnerable Nigerians by diverting resources meant for public services and development.
It added that the National Assembly, in exercising its oversight responsibilities, should demonstrate leadership by ensuring accountability in the management of constituency project funds.
The organisation further argued that the allegations, if established, would amount to breaches of the Constitution, the Fiscal Responsibility Act 2007 and the Public Procurement Act 2007, which require transparency, accountability and due process in the management of public resources.
Politics
Parties’ Deregistration: How Justice Lifu Overruled Appeal Court Justices
Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday brushed aside the order of the Court of Appeal in Abuja which ordered him to stay proceedings in a suit that sought deregistration of the African Democratic Party (ADC), Accord Party and three others.
The Court of Appeal in a unanimous decision of a panel of three Justices had on May 22, 2026 directed the Federal High Court Judge not to proceed with the suit until an appeal pending before them and filed by Accord Party is resolved.
In a Certified True Copy Enrol Order of the Superior Court, Justices Mohammed Danjuma, Adebukola Banjoko and Oyejoju Oyewumi asked the lower Court Judge to stay proceedings until all issues on the appeal filed by the Accord Party were resolved
Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State had, through the Accord Party, applied to justice Lifu to join him as a defendant in the deregistration legal battle instituted by a group of former legislators.
The contention of the Osun State governor was that he had a stake in the Accord Party, being the platform he was seeking re-election in the August 15 gubernatorial poll in the state.
In his ruling, Justice Lifu on April 27 ruled against the Osun State governor, rejecting his request to be joined in the suit to defend his own position and interest.
Not satisfied with the Federal High Court decision, the Osun State governor, through his lawyer, Musibau Adetunbi (SAN), moved to the Court of Appeal in Abuja where he challenged the Justice Lifu decision to refuse to allow him join the suit.
After listening to the argument canvassed, especially that he has interest to protect as Accord Party gubernatorial candidate for Osun State governorship election, the three Justices of the Court of Appeal, unanimously directed Justice Lifu to allow them look into the grievances of the governor.
In specific terms, the Court of Appeal Justices directed Justice Lifu not to proceed further with the matter and fixed October 27 to determine the interlocutory appeal of the appellant.
However, when the certified enroll order and notice of appeal were served on Justice Peter Lifu by Mr Adetunbi (SAN), the judge rejected it on the ground that it was a ploy to arrest his judgment in the matter.
Although the judge had adjourned his judgment delivery in the matter indefinitely, he finally made a dramatic turn around on Monday and proceeded to deliver the judgment that has now proscribed the five political parties.
-
Rivers18 hours ago
Rivers Police Uncovers Firearm Concealed In Loaf Of Bread
-
Niger Delta14 hours agoPro-Chancellor Hands Over Okey Onuchuku Peace, Conflict Institute Building
-
News15 hours agoFubara Reaffirms Commitment To Blue Economy, Private Sector Growth …Calls For Protection Of Marine Resources
-
Sports18 hours ago
Six Nigerians To Play For NBA Teams
-
Business18 hours ago
Gas Economy: Decade of Gas, Pi-CNG/ EV Deepen Media Engagement
-
Business19 hours ago
Navy Nabs 13 Black Sand Miners In Bayelsa –Impound Two Boats
-
Business15 hours agoIPMAN Raises Concern Over Delay In Chinese Refinery Deal …Predicts Lower Fuel Prices Through Competition
-
Business18 hours ago
Accountable Leadership, Urgent Reforms Will Stimulate Economic Growth — Osi
