Editorial
School Fees Reduction: Uba Sani’s Example
As part of efforts to cushion the effect of the rising cost of living in the wake of the petroleum subsidy removal, the Kaduna State Government has reduced tuition fees for state-owned tertiary institutions. The fees were slashed between 30 and 50 per cent for students of the Kaduna State University, Nuhu Bamali Polytechnic, and Kaduna State College of Education, Gidan Waya, among others.
According to the state governor, Uba Sani, the move was in response to an outcry over fees charged by tertiary institutions in the state and its effect on school enrolment and retention. “In response to the public outcry over the current fees being charged by tertiary institutions in Kaduna State and its effect on school enrolment and retention, I have approved the downward review of school fees for tertiary institutions in the state”, Sani said.
The governor has made commendable efforts in reducing tuition fees in higher institutions within the state, which is a step towards alleviating the financial burden on parents and guardians. This move comes at a time when the removal of fuel subsidy has resulted in a higher cost of living for many Nigerians. By addressing the issue of exorbitant tuition fees, the governor has demonstrated a commitment to ensuring that education remains accessible and affordable for all.
This initiative is noteworthy as it not only supports the aspirations of students but also acknowledges the challenges faced by families in meeting the rising costs of education. Indeed, the governor’s decision to reduce tuition fees in higher institutions is a welcome development that will positively impact the lives of many, providing them with much-needed relief amidst the prevailing economic circumstances.
Education is an essential element for the holistic development of individuals and societies. It equips people with knowledge, skills and critical thinking abilities necessary for personal growth and contribution to their communities. Any government that denies its citizens access to education not only hampers their potential but also undermines the progress of the nation as a whole.
Governor Sani’s decision to slash fees and make education more affordable is a huge relief for parents and guardians. In these difficult times, when many families are facing financial hardships, it is necessary to prioritise accessible education. The government’s reduction of school fees can alleviate the burden on students and their families, ensuring that education remains within reach for all. This approach not only promotes equal opportunities but also invests in the future of the nation.
Other states should follow suit and adopt similar measures to ensure that education remains accessible to all, regardless of their financial circumstances. The governments should alleviate the burden on families and students who are struggling to make ends meet during this difficult period. This proactive approach will not only contribute to the well-being and development of individuals, but also to the overall growth and progress of the nation.
The reported increases in tuition fees by various tertiary institutions, especially the Federal Government-owned schools is unrealistic, a step hostile to education and the development of Nigeria’s human capital. It is unrealistic for the reasons that the sudden percentage rise as applicable to each institution is too steep, and the general income level of fee paying parents and guardians cannot by commonsense calculation sustain these fees.
That is why the Federal Government under President Bola Tinubu should take inspiration from the actions of Sani and strive to emulate his approach. He has to implement a reduction in the various fees and levies in higher institutions owned by the Federal Government. Tinubu should recall his promise to Nigerians during the electioneering period that no federal university student would drop out on account of exorbitant school fees if he became the country’s president.
The Nigerian constitution emphasises the government’s responsibility to ensure the security and well-being of its people, with education being second only to health. It directs the government in Section 18(1) to ensure equal educational opportunities at all levels, a fundamental objective of state policy. University education is critical for developing highly educated persons with superior thinking and leadership qualities, as it enables a society aiming for development.
A British statesman and abolitionist, Henry Peter Brougham, asserted that education makes a people easy to lead, but difficult to drive, easy to govern, but impossible to enslave. If we agree with Lord Brougham (which is highly likely), it logically follows that less educated individuals are more vulnerable to enslavement. This raises the question of whether the intentional neglect of education by Nigerian leaders, in terms of budget, teacher training, infrastructure development, and resource allocation, could be attributed to this understanding.
Indeed, the Kaduna governor’s resolve to cut fees of higher institutions in his state is a demonstration of his unwavering dedication to the principles of democracy, social justice, and inclusivity. This decision is a cause for celebration as it underscores the hierarchisation of the welfare of the people under his administration. Sani has exhibited a genuine understanding of the pivotal role education plays in fostering a progressive society. His audacious move emblazons his commitment to ensuring that everyone, regardless of their socio-economic background, has equal access to quality education.
Editorial
Checkmating ‘One-Chance’ Menaces In PH
Editorial
That Oshiomhole’s Call On FG’s Road Projects
There are moments in the life of a legislature when plain speaking becomes a public service. Senator Adams Oshiomhole provided such a moment on the floor of the Senate when he accused the Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, of manifestly neglecting critical federal arteries in Edo and Delta States, and implored his colleagues to prevail on the Minister to adopt a more equitable and genuinely national approach to road infrastructure delivery. It was blunt, it was uncomfortable, and it was necessary.
The specifics of his complaint deserve restating. Drawing attention to the recent approval of some 20 new road projects despite the parlous state of existing ones, the former Edo State governor lamented that Nigerians cannot travel from Benin to Warri, Benin to Asaba, Benin to Auchi, or Auchi to Okene without encountering severe distress. He alleged a deliberate omission of these corridors from the national budget in the last three years, save for palliative interventions directed by President Bola Tinubu through tax credit arrangements. His question — “What have we done wrong?” — resonates far beyond the chambers of the National Assembly.
We lend our full and unequivocal support to that call. The Auchi-Benin Road, for instance, has been in a deplorable and near-impassable condition for several years, turning what should be a two-hour journey into an all-day ordeal of broken axles, extortionate fares, and despondent commuters. The media have, on multiple occasions, chronicled the suffering of motorists, traders, and students who ply that route. To describe it as a federal road today is to stretch the meaning of the term beyond recognition.
This pattern of sidelining is not confined to Edo or Delta. Even here in Rivers State, the disposition of the Federal Ministry of Works has left much to be desired, particularly along the Eleme axis of the East-West Road. That road, which ought to be a flagship of federal presence in the Niger Delta, has remained in a wretched state for long. Those who use it daily — workers at the Eleme Petrochemical Complex, the two refineries, Onne Port, and the countless ancillary industries — can attest to its deterioration. Work has proceeded in fits and starts without the sustained urgency such a strategic road demands.
The Eleme stretch is not a mere intra-state byway. It is the gateway to the nation’s economic jugular. According to the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing’s 2023 Highway Condition Survey, only about 35 per cent of the country’s 36,000 kilometres of federal roads are rated as being in good or fair condition, with the remainder classified as poor or very poor. The East-West Road, conceived in the 1970s to bind the entire Niger Delta, remains unfinished in critical sections more than four decades after. If it had been treated as a priority, the perennial gridlock, carnage, and economic loss on the Eleme-Refinery junction would have long been consigned to history.
The irony is as painful as it is glaring. The Niger Delta remains the goose that lays the golden eggs. Data from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative [NEITI 2023 Oil and Gas Audit] show that the region still accounts for over 78 per cent of Nigeria’s federally collected export earnings and about 65 per cent of total government revenue. The National Bureau of Statistics [NBS Foreign Trade Report Q4 2024] similarly confirms that crude oil continues to dominate export receipts. By every metric of equity and economic logic, a region that sustains the national purse deserves first-rate consideration in the allocation of infrastructure, not afterthoughts and tokenism.
Road infrastructure is not largesse to be dispensed by favour; it is the skeleton upon which commerce, cohesion, and citizenship hang. When contracts are concentrated in one geopolitical zone while other zones are left to contend with craters, it erodes trust in the federation itself. The World Bank’s Nigeria Development Update [June 2023] estimated that poor transport connectivity inflates the cost of moving goods by up to 40 per cent and costs the Nigerian economy an estimated $1.5 billion annually in lost man-hours and vehicle maintenance. If we profess to be one country, then equity must be the compass that guides key institutions before any project is executed. Development must spread round, not pool in one place as though other regions do not matter.
There is also a grave security dimension that can no longer be ignored. The deplorable condition of federal roads has become a veritable enabler of criminality. The NBS Crime Experience and Security Perception Survey reported over 2.5 million incidents of kidnapping-related occurrences nationally, with transport workers identifying bad road spots as prime ambush points. When vehicles are forced to crawl at 10 kilometres per hour through failed sections at Auchi, Sapele Road, or Eleme, they become sitting ducks for armed gangs. Fixing bad roads, therefore, is not merely about convenience; it is about safeguarding lives.
By his intervention, Senator Oshiomhole has hit the nail on the head and reminded Minister Umahi of a fundamental constitutional truth: public office is held in trust. The Ministry of Works is not a personal estate where contracts are awarded according to whim or political convenience. It is a national institution funded by the collective resources of Nigerians, including the oil and gas rents from the very communities whose roads are now neglected. The Minister must demonstrate balance, transparency, and a pan-Nigerian outlook in the distribution of projects that impact the daily existence of citizens. Selective neglect breeds suspicion, and suspicion is corrosive at a time when the nation is preaching unity, oneness, equity, and justice.
Consequently, the National Assembly must go beyond rhetoric and assert its oversight powers with vigour. Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution [as amended] empower the legislature to investigate and expose any maladministration in the execution of federal projects. If an office holder is not acting rightly, it is the duty of the Senate and the House of Representatives to call him to order. Oversight must not be reduced to budget approval ceremonies; it must translate to field verification, public hearings, and insistence that the Federal Character principle, as enshrined in Section 14(3) of the Constitution, reflects in road awards.
Let the Auchi-Okene, Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, and Eleme East-West gangways be restored to motorable dignity. Let priority be given to completing existing, economically vital roads before embarking on new ones. If those who, through their resources, sustain the federation are sidelined in the distribution of tangible dividends, it tells poorly of our nationhood. Bad roads must be fixed, and they must be fixed now, with fairness as the guiding standard.
Editorial
Making Rivers’ 2026 Budget Count
-
News2 days agoRSG Targets Nine Million Residents in Mosquito Net Distribution Campaign
-
Oil & Energy1 day agoAiyedatiwa Signs New Electricity Bill
-
Maritime1 day agoMarine Minister Commends President Tinubu On NPERA Bill Assent
-
Oil & Energy1 day agoNLNG Commissions Research And Innovation Centre In RSU
-
News2 days agoKenPoly Holds Eight Convocations, August 29
-
News2 days agoRMAFC Completes Revenue Sharing Review, Proposes New Pay
-
News2 days agoRSG Begins Another Phase of Projects Commissioning Today
-
Maritime1 day agoNAGAFF Petitions IGP Over Alleged Maritime Police Harassment
