Opinion
Of Mentors And Mediums
Individual human beings are often mentored and guided daily without knowing the sources, purposes and mechanism of such rich bounties which they enjoy. A mentor is an experienced person who advises and helps less experienced persons, while a medium is someone endowed with the power to receive messages from distant and far memories, and then transmit same to a few persons open to such promptings. Distant and far memories should be understood to mean hierarchies of consciousness or awareness, ranging from the mundane to the transcendental.
It is to be expected that there is a defined range of awareness common to humans, having to do with the prevailing level of maturity, just as there is a defined range of sound waves (measured in decibels), which human ears are capable of catching. This translates into the fact that human senses of perception are limited to some definite range. However, humans are endowed with another medium of perception beyond the grossly limited sensory one, to which the majority of humans pay a greater homage. Thus all humans cannot be described as being equal with regards to openness to radiations from distant and far memories.
There are benevolent individuals and organisations that devote resources for the purposes of mentoring, guiding and helping less privileged persons in society. Expectedly, there are conditions necessary to qualify persons in need of help to be able to receive such help. One of such conditions would require knowing of the existence, nature and operational mechanism of reachable mentors who are devoted to helping humans. Not all mentors and helpers are registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission as humanitarian agencies.
Inequalities among humans arise largely as a result of personal negligence and other deficiencies, whereby individuals allow themselves to be misguided by prevailing aspirations and values. Thus free will as an endowment common to every individual, becomes a means predisposing a number of persons to stagnate or retrogress through inability to exert themselves diligently. Surely, mentorship places diligence in personal exertion as a precondition to help aspiring persons. Neither would aspirations focused on mundane values and avarice endear anyone to noble-minded mentors or benevolent helpers.
Help and support are meant to be given largely to those who deserve them based on the nature of their strivings as well as the level of diligence therein. The guiding philosophy of mentorship and mediumship is based on genuine love for the well-being of humanity. Personal volition comes next after love, because no mentor or helper would do anything contrary to the volition of any individual. This article will focus attention on invisible mentors and helpers who seek to guide individuals who fulfill conditions for their support, whose major goal is to pull erring humans out of the pool of darkness. We live and move in such darkness!
What humans refer to as the beyond or hereafter covers endless vast regions and planes where human souls sojourn after earthly departure, according to their various degrees of maturity, awareness, recognitions of the issues and meanings of existence, as well as the nature of atonement necessary to be made. Humans on Earth engage in such frolicsome activities which depict pathetic ignorance and immaturity, which become recognisable after earthly death. Invisible mentors seek to help erring humans out of such plight.
Humans are endowed with conscience as a means to judge and stay away from wrong actions and thoughts. Mentors and helpers use the conscience as a medium to admonish erring humans, but they would not compel anyone to heed their admonitions. Similarly, they use the intuition (which may be called the still, small voice) as well as dreams as other media to pass vital ideas to individuals via pictures and symbols. Individuals whose conscience get clouded and obtuse, and whose intuitive perceptions become dull and blunt, miss out the bounties from the mentors and guides.
The mechanism of prayers, supplications, invocations and meditations follow the established rule of communication, whereby only that which lies closest to you can always find connection with you. You do not count six and seven without starting from one and two, etc; therefore similar mechanism applies in mentorship and mediumship, neither does it require a professor of languages to teach children basic alphabets. Nature, like creation itself, abhors a vacuum or gap, otherwise everything would crumble and collapse. Therefore, rules of engagement guide every activity, leaving no gaps!
Communication is never a one-way or one-sided affair because individuals send out their volition according to their needs, and also can receive feed-back from distant sources for various purposes. In all such mechanism, the well-being rather than the undermining of humanity counts as most vital. The collective experiences of humanity remain stored in the archives of Natural History, arranged in the order of homogeneity. It happens that from time to time, a few individuals can be exposed to some aspects of past events which can be communicated to the public, albeit in a greater distorted rendering.
Mediums, as persons with highly rarefied consciousness (which is not always a permanent state) can mediate information from distant and far memories for the benefit of humanity. Such information may be intended to warn the public about some impending events, or it may be a means of opening to the public some rare knowledge for the future. In some cases, some mediums put the ideas mediated to them into writing which an obtuse public may find very hard to appreciate. For fear of ridicules such ideas may become lost to humanity because a medium fears to publish ideas received from rare sources.
In the case of Francis Bacon (1561-1626) who was one such high medium, William Shakespear, an astute stage manager, became a ready means of using plays and drama to pass on messages mediated from far memories. Human beings and nations lose out when material values and aspirations predominate, and when no heed is paid to mentors and mediums. Thus, we are mocked with art! Good leadership demands high mentorship.
By: Bright Amirize
Dr Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
