Editorial
RSIEC And Council Polls
From all indications, the 23 local government areas in Rivers State, currently being administered through caretaker arrangement will soon wear a democratic garb. This follows preparations by the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC), to conduct council elections in the State.
Announcing June 16, 2018 as the date for council elections in the State, the Chairman/Chief Electoral Commissioner, Justice C. I. Uriri (rtd), in a meeting with stakeholders, said that the commission had concluded plans to conduct council polls in all the 23 local government areas that make up the State.
Apparently citing relevant sections of the Electoral Law, the RSIEC boss explained that in compliance with the provisions of the enabling law, the commission was obliged by law to give 90-day mandatory notice to political parties and aspirants to set the stage for the elections.
Assuring that the electoral umpire would be guided by all enabling legislations relating to elections, Justice Uriri implored parties and politicians to avoid acts that are capable of jeopardising the electoral process.
While The Tide fully endorses the move to ensure that democratic norms and values prevail at the local government level, we are, indeed, gladdened by the level of seriousness and commitment exhibited so far by the Justice Uriri-led commission to conduct credible, free and fair elections in the 23 councils of the State.
The commission’s parley with security agencies, especially with the police, and other stakeholders is, to say the least, heart-warming and re-assuring. We expect this sensitisation and mobilisation to be a continuous one even after the elections.
Going by Justice Uriri’s antecedents, we believe that the commission will provide a level playing ground for parties and politicians to test their popularity in a free, fair and tension-free contest. The electoral body must, therefore, strive to adopt an open- door policy where all forms of complaints would be entertained on their merit.
The commission should also embark on massive voters education and training of electoral and ad hoc staff that would man the 23 local government areas, while also ensuring that adequate preparations are made for printing of sensitive and non-sensitive electoral materials ahead of time.
We want to also remind RSIEC that the success or otherwise of any election depends largely on the authenticity of the updated voters register which the commission must obtain early enough from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
We welcome the news that 67 political parties in the State have so far indicated interest to participate in the council polls. While we urge the political parties to support and co-operate with RSIEC in ensuring smooth and credible council polls in the State, we implore the main opposition party, the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the State to have a rethink on its decision to boycott the elections.
The fact that our local government areas are still under caretaker administration in a democratic setting should be a source of concern to all well-meaning citizens of the State, including politicians and political parties.
The Tide notes that virtually all neighbouring States in the South-South and South-East geo-political zones in the country have successfully conducted council polls, and Rivers State can not be an exception.
We must, therefore, move forward as a people with a common destiny, no matter our political affiliations or differences by ensuring that the local government elections are conducted as scheduled by RSIEC.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
