Editorial
Making Neighbourhood Watch Law Work
Arguably, none of the 25 bills so far passed by the 8th Rivers State House of Assembly has generated so much controversy like the State Neighbourhood Watch Safety Corps Bill recently signed into law by Governor Nyesom Wike. In fact, since the inception of the current democratic experiment in 1999, only an infinitesimal percentage of bills went through such hurdle.
Little wonder why several state government officials including Governor Wike, the State Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Emmanuel Chinwe Aguma (SAN), the Minority Leader of the State legislature, Frederick Anabraba (sponsor of the bill), among others, at different fora, had explained the import and essence of the bill.
In a nutshell, the proponents of the bill affirmed in unmistakable terms that the bill which was signed into law, penultimate week, by the State governor was meant to enhance the State internal security and the much-talked about community policing.
Elucidating on the philosophy behind the bill, Hon Anabraba explained in a live radio programme that the intention of the bill is not to haunt anybody or group but to assist the security agencies for effective networking, collaboration and prevention of crimes and criminality in the 23 local government areas of the State.
While regretting the widespread misconception of the law, especially by the opposition, the lawmaker said the agency which will oversee the law would boost security, promote civilian-police relationship, cover areas of lapses by security agencies as well as harmonise the operations of vigilante groups in the State.
The Tide agrees no less with the position of the State government that the State Neighbourhood Watch Safety Corps is not a militia group to haunt political opponents (perceived or real), but an intelligence and information gathering outfit that will not bear arms except with the express permission of the Police, as explained by Governor Wike.
We recall that Lagos and Kano States have similar security outfits that are effective in combating crimes. It is our candid opinion, therefore, that the Rivers State Neighbourhood Watch Safety Corps be given all necessary support to check cultism, pipeline vandalism, kidnapping, sea piracy, illegal bunkering, armed robbery and other anti-societal vices that plague the State.
Fortunately enough, the agency will be overseen by Dr. Uche Chukwuma , a retired Assistant Commissioner of Police with an excellent pedigree in security management. We believe that he will use his wealth of experience to discharge his duties conscientiously and with the fear of God.
While we commend Governor Wike for signing the bill into law and for appointing a seasoned security expert like Chukwuma as the Director General of the State Neighbourhood Watch Safety Corps, we expect the Chukwuma-led outfit to deliver on its mandate. This is the sure way to prove critics wrong that the Corps was not established to haunt political enemies or score cheap political points by the Wike-led administration.
Similarly, we implore the Police High Command, Department of State Services (DSS), Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and other security agencies to synergise, support and co-operate with the State Neighbourhood Watch Corps to succeed.
In the same vein, citizens must do the needful by giving useful information and intelligence reports to the agency for effective security in the State.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
