Opinion
Ending Nass’ Jumbo Emoluments Imbroglio
The canker of jumbo emoluments at the top stratum of
public service in the three tiers of government has bedeviled the Nigerian state since the return to civil rule in 1999. Under the immediate past administration the larva canker metamorphosed to a fearsome pupa that has defied the natural phenomenon to lose grip, and burst its over-fed body on the ground beneath; instead, the behemoth has devoured us for the past 16 years! The jumbo emoluments comprising salaries and allowances are both unjustifiable and unsustainable. All of us are collectively responsible for its origin and sustenance, and must collectively stand up to end it.
The current reported palliative and fire-brigade conference between the lawmakers and the Revenue Mobilization, Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) to review the remuneration of affected public office-holders is both face-saving and belated: both the legislators and RMAFC members are beneficiaries of any recommended remuneration package, and would ordinarily not freely give up the honey bottle they had sucked in the past 16 years; no, not after the legislators had just passed through the valley of shadow of death at recent electioneering.
Acting sincerely and altruistically, the RMAFC would have even before the party primaries produced a revised remuneration package for the legislators (in line with S.70 of the Constitution), as for the prospective contestants to make an informed assessment of the profitability of their office-seeking ventures. But after they have gained political power with reasonable bargaining power, we expect that they will give up their jumbo pays without a strong resistance, or we’re calling on Buhari to do the politically inexpedient that almost cost pugilist OBJ his seat in 1999. No, to stop them requires the workforce of about 177 million Nigerians who had been short-changed in the political office-holders’ jumbo pays.
We the people had over the past 16 years complained and barked without biting the legislators — suffering and smiling, and hobnobbing with our oppressors! Even when RMAFC in July 2011 by newspaper advertorials distanced itself from the jumbo pays appropriated by the legislators (and extended to other top public servants), the wider public and a vociferous Civil Society Organization would not take cue to start a determined fight; it is claimed (and factually so) that key members of the CSOs are complicit in siphoning part of the National Assembly (NASS)’s bloated annual budgets through phony programmes (the case of N250m CSO dole-out in Senate’s 2010 budget is cited); in like manner, the leadership of front line labour unions has been complicit in running the affairs of their unions, and thus lack the moral gumption to credibly challenge the rapacity of legislators and political office holders: a cover-up action has been organized labour’s frequent (and often successful) demand for unsustainable wage increases from a spineless political leadership. The rot snowballed into the current position where governments now need to borrow to pay the backlog of workers’ emoluments. So, how do we get out ofthis conundrum?
What is currently being formulated by NASS and RMAFC amounts to the concoction of an alchemist: being beneficiaries of its recommendations, RMAFC members alone cannot be unbiased judges in their case. It thus behooves the organized labour (NLC, TUC, ASUU, etc) to partner competent CSO representatives to propose a realistic remuneration package for the new legislators, and engage RMAFC on the strength of knowledge to this effect. The offer of N500,000 and N400,000 monthly emolument for each Senator and Rep, respectively, has been repeatedly proposed, and legislators will have the option to take it or resign. Invariably, RMAFC should appoint or constitute a reputable management consulting team with representatives from public sector management institutes (like ASCON and Centre for Management Development, CMD) to carry out an operational audit on the National Assembly, with a view to removing the overtly inefficient processes built in to serve the greed of committee chairmen and members; NASS has so far not been structured to operate in an efficient manner. The audit will expunge provocative items like individual legislative aides (for covering up incompetent legislators), security vote, medical and physical fitness, refreshments, SUVs for the leadership and committee chairmen, etc, etc. The audit will also verify the claim by management experts that NASS’ true expenditure can be contained with an annual budget of N25 billion, as opposed to the present annual budget theft of N150bn being perpetrated in the past four years.
The contagious effects of legislators’ jumbo emoluments have spread to the entire labour market, and containing these diseases will equally stabilize wage, buoy workers’ real wage, and positively impact job creation, among the numerous benefits.
The payment of N8.64bn as allowances to the legislators can be tolerated as a pragmatic kind gesture to provide the politicians with a breather from the biting effect of their recent campaign expenses; it is a repayable soft loan for them to settle down in Abuja, and not for furniture and accommodation. Nigerians should ask questions on the purported auction of Apo Legislative Quarters meant to house newly elected legislators; the EFCC should once be directed to recover the quarters from the previous lawmakers that thought they could corner them to themselves and turn round to ask for housing allowance for new lawmakers. Also to be recovered are all the allowances in excess of what RMAFC recommended for past political office-holders.
The task of ensuring justice and fair play in this vexatious and disruptive jumbo pay issue cannot be left for the RMAFC and legislators alone to perform. In countries like the UK, Canada, Sweden, Kenya and Ghana with incidents of parliamentary financial scandals of even lesser proportions, mechanisms were put in place for independent bodies to both recover all stolen funds and determine appropriate emoluments and accounting systems for legislators to efficiently discharge their responsibilities. Our political office-holders have capitalized on our indifference and uncoordinated complaints to defraud us for so long. It is necessary that Nigerians should go out now with a proposed remuneration package and occupy the gates of RMAFC and NASS to ensure the eradication of jumbo pay and budget theft in the present dispensation. Now is our chance to kill the canker!
Anyanwu is a senior economist with C-JET, a civil society group in Port Harcourt.
Victor Anyanwu
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers1 day ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News1 day agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics1 day ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured1 day agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News1 day ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News1 day agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News1 day agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
